Giant pituitary macroadenoma of stem cell origin: illustrative case.

ACA = anterior cerebral artery CTA = computed tomography angiography DWI = diffusion weighted imaging ICA = internal carotid artery MCA = middle cerebral artery MRI = magnetic resonance imaging OCT = optical coherence tomography giant macroadenoma pituitary adenoma stem cells transsphenoidal resection visual dysfunction

Journal

Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons
ISSN: 2694-1902
Titre abrégé: J Neurosurg Case Lessons
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9918227275606676

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 Mar 2021
Historique:
received: 10 01 2021
accepted: 13 01 2021
entrez: 20 7 2022
pubmed: 8 3 2021
medline: 8 3 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Giant pituitary macroadenomas with a diameter >4 cm are rare tumors, accounting for only about 5% of pituitary adenomas. They are more difficult to maximally resect safely owing to limited access as well as encasement of adjacent structures. Acidophil stem cell adenomas are rare immature neoplasms proposed to derive from common progenitor cells of somatotroph and lactotroph cells. These adenomas comprise about 4.3% of surgically removed pituitary adenomas. No previous reports have described acidophil stem cell adenomas that grow to the size of giant macroadenomas. This rare entity poses special challenges given the need for maximal safe resection in an immature neoplasm. The authors report a 21-year-old female who presented with 3 years of progressive visual decline and a giant macroadenoma. She underwent endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for decompression. Given the tumor size and involvement of adjacent critical structures, gross-total resection was not achieved. The authors review the literature on giant pituitary adenomas and provide a discussion on clinical management for this rare entity. The authors present a very rare case of a giant pituitary adenoma of acidophil stem cell origin and discuss the technical and management challenges in this rare entity.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Giant pituitary macroadenomas with a diameter >4 cm are rare tumors, accounting for only about 5% of pituitary adenomas. They are more difficult to maximally resect safely owing to limited access as well as encasement of adjacent structures. Acidophil stem cell adenomas are rare immature neoplasms proposed to derive from common progenitor cells of somatotroph and lactotroph cells. These adenomas comprise about 4.3% of surgically removed pituitary adenomas. No previous reports have described acidophil stem cell adenomas that grow to the size of giant macroadenomas. This rare entity poses special challenges given the need for maximal safe resection in an immature neoplasm.
OBSERVATIONS METHODS
The authors report a 21-year-old female who presented with 3 years of progressive visual decline and a giant macroadenoma. She underwent endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for decompression. Given the tumor size and involvement of adjacent critical structures, gross-total resection was not achieved. The authors review the literature on giant pituitary adenomas and provide a discussion on clinical management for this rare entity.
LESSONS CONCLUSIONS
The authors present a very rare case of a giant pituitary adenoma of acidophil stem cell origin and discuss the technical and management challenges in this rare entity.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35855437
doi: 10.3171/CASE2122
pii: CASE2122
pmc: PMC9241200
doi:

Types de publication

Case Reports

Langues

eng

Pagination

CASE2122

Informations de copyright

© 2021 The authors.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Disclosures The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.

Références

Cancer. 1981 Feb 15;47(4):761-71
pubmed: 6261917
Asian J Neurosurg. 2010 Jan;5(1):48-53
pubmed: 22028743
Cancer. 2004 Aug 1;101(3):613-9
pubmed: 15274075
Trends Cancer. 2020 Mar;6(3):223-235
pubmed: 32101725
Surg Neurol. 1997 Mar;47(3):213-22; discussion 222-3
pubmed: 9068690
Surg Neurol. 2004 May;61(5):436-45; discussion 445-6
pubmed: 15120215
Cell. 1999 May 28;97(5):587-98
pubmed: 10367888
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008 May;49(5):1879-85
pubmed: 18263812
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1977 Nov;101(11):594-9
pubmed: 199135
J Neurosurg. 2002 Aug;97(2):299-306
pubmed: 12186457
Lancet. 1999 Nov 6;354(9190):1594-7
pubmed: 10560674
BMC Surg. 2014 Aug 28;14:59
pubmed: 25163653
J Neurosurg. 2015 Dec;123(6):1489-99
pubmed: 26162035
Neuro Oncol. 1999 Jan;1(1):14-25
pubmed: 11554386
J Endocrinol. 2012 Nov;215(2):239-45
pubmed: 22872762
World Neurosurg. 2011 Jul-Aug;76(1-2):141-8; discussion 63-6
pubmed: 21839965

Auteurs

David T Asuzu (DT)

Department of Neurosurgery.
Surgical Neurology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.

Rebecca M Burke (RM)

Department of Neurosurgery.

Jeffrey Hakim (J)

Department of Neurosurgery.

Dylan Coss (D)

Division of Neuropathology, and.

Min S Park (MS)

Department of Neurosurgery.

Spencer C Payne (SC)

Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia; and.

John A Jane (JA)

Department of Neurosurgery.

Classifications MeSH