A systematic review of relational-based therapies for the treatment of auditory hallucinations in patients with psychotic disorders.

Auditory hallucinations psychotic disorders relational therapies systematic review

Journal

Psychological medicine
ISSN: 1469-8978
Titre abrégé: Psychol Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 1254142

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2022
Historique:
pubmed: 21 7 2022
medline: 25 11 2022
entrez: 20 7 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Auditory hallucinations in patients with psychotic disorders may be very distressing. Unfortunately, a large proportion of individuals are resistant to pharmacological interventions and the gold-standard cognitive-behavioral therapy for psychosis offers at best modest effects. To improve therapeutic outcomes, several therapies have been created to establish a relationship between voice-hearers and their voices. With increasing literature, we conducted a systematic review of dialogical therapies and examined the evidence behind their efficacy. A systematic search was performed in PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Articles were included if they discussed the effects of dialogical interventions for patients with psychotic disorders. A total of 17 studies were included within this systematic review. Cumulative evidence from various therapies has shown that entering in a dialog with voices is beneficial to patients, even those who are resistant to current pharmacological treatments. Heightened benefits have been mainly observed with Relating Therapy and Avatar Therapy/Virtual Reality assisted Therapy, with evidence generally of moderate quality. Both these interventions have shown large to very large effects on voices and voice-related distress as well as moderate to large magnitude improvements on affective symptoms. Though, cognitive-behavioral therapy for command hallucinations and making sense of voices noted no improvements on voices. Literature on relational-based interventions with a strong emphasis on the relational aspects of voice hearing has shown positive effects. Results suggest that these dialogical therapies might surpass the efficacy of current gold-standard approaches.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Auditory hallucinations in patients with psychotic disorders may be very distressing. Unfortunately, a large proportion of individuals are resistant to pharmacological interventions and the gold-standard cognitive-behavioral therapy for psychosis offers at best modest effects. To improve therapeutic outcomes, several therapies have been created to establish a relationship between voice-hearers and their voices. With increasing literature, we conducted a systematic review of dialogical therapies and examined the evidence behind their efficacy.
METHODS
A systematic search was performed in PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Articles were included if they discussed the effects of dialogical interventions for patients with psychotic disorders.
RESULTS
A total of 17 studies were included within this systematic review. Cumulative evidence from various therapies has shown that entering in a dialog with voices is beneficial to patients, even those who are resistant to current pharmacological treatments. Heightened benefits have been mainly observed with Relating Therapy and Avatar Therapy/Virtual Reality assisted Therapy, with evidence generally of moderate quality. Both these interventions have shown large to very large effects on voices and voice-related distress as well as moderate to large magnitude improvements on affective symptoms. Though, cognitive-behavioral therapy for command hallucinations and making sense of voices noted no improvements on voices.
CONCLUSIONS
Literature on relational-based interventions with a strong emphasis on the relational aspects of voice hearing has shown positive effects. Results suggest that these dialogical therapies might surpass the efficacy of current gold-standard approaches.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35855651
doi: 10.1017/S003329172200143X
pii: S003329172200143X
pmc: PMC9386435
doi:

Types de publication

Systematic Review Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2001-2008

Auteurs

Laura Dellazizzo (L)

Research center of the Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.

Sabrina Giguère (S)

Research center of the Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.

Nayla Léveillé (N)

Research center of the Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.

Stéphane Potvin (S)

Research center of the Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.

Alexandre Dumais (A)

Research center of the Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Institut national de psychiatrie légale Philippe-Pinel, Montreal, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH