Oxygen uptake efficiency slope in healthy normal weight young males: an applicable framework for calculation and interpretation.
Aerobic threshold
Anaerobic threshold
Cardiorespiratory fitness
Oxygen consumption
Journal
PeerJ
ISSN: 2167-8359
Titre abrégé: PeerJ
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101603425
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
16
03
2022
accepted:
19
06
2022
entrez:
20
7
2022
pubmed:
21
7
2022
medline:
21
7
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The oxygen uptake efficiency slope (OUES) is considered a reliable indicator of cardiorespiratory fitness in young and clinical populations who cannot achieve maximal effort during a graded exercise test. However, OUES accuracy depends on the data points used for its calculation and it is still not clear if the submaximal OUES can accurately assess CRF in healthy young males. We investigated the association between peak oxygen uptake and peak and submaximal OUES, and the agreement between submaximal OUES and peak OUES in male adolescents and young adults. In this cross-sectional, observational study, fifty normal weight healthy participants (age 14-22 years, peak oxygen uptake 43.8 ± 7.3 mL·min Very strong correlations were observed between peak oxygen uptake and peak OUES ( . The peak OUES is a better indicator of aerobic fitness than the OUES up to the anaerobic threshold in healthy, young males. The OUES up to the anaerobic threshold is a valid alternative to peak OUES.
Sections du résumé
Background
The oxygen uptake efficiency slope (OUES) is considered a reliable indicator of cardiorespiratory fitness in young and clinical populations who cannot achieve maximal effort during a graded exercise test. However, OUES accuracy depends on the data points used for its calculation and it is still not clear if the submaximal OUES can accurately assess CRF in healthy young males.
Objective
We investigated the association between peak oxygen uptake and peak and submaximal OUES, and the agreement between submaximal OUES and peak OUES in male adolescents and young adults.
Methods
In this cross-sectional, observational study, fifty normal weight healthy participants (age 14-22 years, peak oxygen uptake 43.8 ± 7.3 mL·min
Results
Very strong correlations were observed between peak oxygen uptake and peak OUES (
Conclusions
. The peak OUES is a better indicator of aerobic fitness than the OUES up to the anaerobic threshold in healthy, young males. The OUES up to the anaerobic threshold is a valid alternative to peak OUES.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35855898
doi: 10.7717/peerj.13709
pii: 13709
pmc: PMC9288162
doi:
Substances chimiques
Oxygen
S88TT14065
Types de publication
Observational Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e13709Informations de copyright
© 2022 Falcioni et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Laura Guidetti is an Academic Editor for PeerJ.
Références
Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10
pubmed: 2868172
Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2010 Aug;22(3):431-41
pubmed: 20814038
J Exerc Sci Fit. 2021 Apr;19(2):75-80
pubmed: 33335553
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 20;14(3):e0214029
pubmed: 30893355
J Pediatr. 1978 Jul;93(1):62-6
pubmed: 650346
J Chem Inf Model. 2015 Jul 27;55(7):1316-22
pubmed: 26099013
Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2012 Aug;24(3):357-68
pubmed: 22971553
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2017 Apr 1;122(4):997-1002
pubmed: 28153947
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996 Nov 15;28(6):1567-72
pubmed: 8917273
Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2017 Aug;29(3):350-360
pubmed: 28253063
Eur J Sport Sci. 2022 Mar;22(3):425-435
pubmed: 33331795
Int J Sports Med. 2005 Feb;26 Suppl 1:S38-48
pubmed: 15702455
Vital Health Stat 11. 2010 Apr;(250):1-87
pubmed: 20812448
Res Q Exerc Sport. 1980 Mar;51(1):234-48
pubmed: 7394286
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007 Oct;39(10):1811-6
pubmed: 17909409
J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Apr;32(4):1013-1019
pubmed: 29351164
Singapore Med J. 2003 Dec;44(12):614-9
pubmed: 14770254
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2011 Jun;18(3):384-92
pubmed: 21450644
Am J Ment Defic. 1981 Sep;86(2):127-37
pubmed: 7315877
Front Physiol. 2019 Feb 19;10:130
pubmed: 30837896
Arch Dis Child. 1999 Jul;81(1):73-5
pubmed: 10373142
Arch Dis Child. 2020 Dec;105(12):1167-1174
pubmed: 32732318
Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2012 Feb;24(1):129-41
pubmed: 22433258
J Sports Sci Med. 2005 Mar 01;4(1):29-36
pubmed: 24431958
Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2007 May;19(2):159-70
pubmed: 17603139
Int J Obes (Lond). 2006 Apr;30(4):598-602
pubmed: 16570089
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 31;13(12):e0209925
pubmed: 30596748
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2019 Jan;26(2):177-184
pubmed: 30354736