Comparative effectiveness of ChAdOx1 versus BNT162b2 covid-19 vaccines in health and social care workers in England: cohort study using OpenSAFELY.
Journal
BMJ (Clinical research ed.)
ISSN: 1756-1833
Titre abrégé: BMJ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8900488
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 07 2022
20 07 2022
Historique:
entrez:
20
7
2022
pubmed:
21
7
2022
medline:
23
7
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To compare the effectiveness of the BNT162b2 mRNA (Pfizer-BioNTech) and the ChAdOx1 (Oxford-AstraZeneca) covid-19 vaccines against infection and covid-19 disease in health and social care workers. Cohort study, emulating a comparative effectiveness trial, on behalf of NHS England. Linked primary care, hospital, and covid-19 surveillance records available within the OpenSAFELY-TPP research platform, covering a period when the SARS-CoV-2 Alpha variant was dominant. 317 341 health and social care workers vaccinated between 4 January and 28 February 2021, registered with a general practice using the TPP SystmOne clinical information system in England, and not clinically extremely vulnerable. Vaccination with either BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1 administered as part of the national covid-19 vaccine roll-out. Recorded SARS-CoV-2 positive test, or covid-19 related attendance at an accident and emergency (A&E) department or hospital admission occurring within 20 weeks of receipt of the first vaccine dose. Over the duration of 118 771 person-years of follow-up there were 6962 positive SARS-CoV-2 tests, 282 covid-19 related A&E attendances, and 166 covid-19 related hospital admissions. The cumulative incidence of each outcome was similar for both vaccines during the first 20 weeks after vaccination. The cumulative incidence of recorded SARS-CoV-2 infection 20 weeks after first-dose vaccination with BNT162b2 was 21.7 per 1000 people (95% confidence interval 20.9 to 22.4) and with ChAdOx1 was 23.7 (21.8 to 25.6), representing a difference of 2.04 per 1000 people (0.04 to 4.04). The difference in the cumulative incidence per 1000 people of covid-19 related A&E attendance at 20 weeks was 0.06 per 1000 people (95% CI -0.31 to 0.43). For covid-19 related hospital admission, this difference was 0.11 per 1000 people (-0.22 to 0.44). In this cohort of healthcare workers where we would not anticipate vaccine type to be related to health status, we found no substantial differences in the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection or covid-19 disease up to 20 weeks after vaccination. Incidence dropped sharply at 3-4 weeks after vaccination, and there were few covid-19 related hospital attendance and admission events after this period. This is in line with expected onset of vaccine induced immunity and suggests strong protection against Alpha variant covid-19 disease for both vaccines in this relatively young and healthy population of healthcare workers.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35858680
doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-068946
pmc: PMC9295078
doi:
Substances chimiques
COVID-19 Vaccines
0
Viral Vaccines
0
BNT162 Vaccine
N38TVC63NU
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e068946Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_PC_20058
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_PC_20059
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/R010161/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form and declare the following: BG has received research funding from Health Data Research UK (HDRUK), the Laura and John Arnold Foundation, the Wellcome Trust, the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, the NHS National Institute for Health Research School of Primary Care Research, the Mohn-Westlake Foundation, the Good Thinking Foundation, the Health Foundation, and the World Health Organisation; he also receives personal income from speaking and writing for lay audiences on the misuse of science. IJD holds shares in GlaxoSmithKline (GSK).
Références
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Nov;27(11):1699.e5-1699.e8
pubmed: 34265462
Lancet. 2021 May 8;397(10286):1725-1735
pubmed: 33901423
N Engl J Med. 2022 Jan 13;386(2):105-115
pubmed: 34942066
Lancet. 2021 May 1;397(10285):1646-1657
pubmed: 33901420
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Nov 3;16(1):148
pubmed: 27809784
BMJ. 2021 Aug 18;374:n1868
pubmed: 34407952
Br J Gen Pract. 2021 Dec 31;72(714):e51-e62
pubmed: 34750106
N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 31;383(27):2603-2615
pubmed: 33301246
Lancet. 2021 Jan 9;397(10269):99-111
pubmed: 33306989
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Nov;21(11):1529-1538
pubmed: 34174193
BMJ. 2021 May 13;373:n1088
pubmed: 33985964
Bull Natl Res Cent. 2021;45(1):150
pubmed: 34456555