Patient satisfaction with post-operative pain management and associated factors among surgical patients at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital: Cross-sectional study.
Patients' satisfaction
Postoperative pain
Surgical patients
Journal
Annals of medicine and surgery (2012)
ISSN: 2049-0801
Titre abrégé: Ann Med Surg (Lond)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101616869
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2022
Jul 2022
Historique:
received:
01
05
2022
revised:
23
06
2022
accepted:
23
06
2022
entrez:
21
7
2022
pubmed:
22
7
2022
medline:
22
7
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Patient satisfaction with postoperative pain management is a vital tool for measuring the quality of care in health centers, which associated with the care process and care outcome. There is still few evidence on factor for patient satisfaction with postoperative pain management. These study aimed to assess magnitude of Patient satisfaction with post-operative pain management and associated factors among surgical patients at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, from Feb 1- Apr 30, 2021. Institutional based cross-sectional study was conducted among 335 adult patients using a systematic random sampling technique. Data were collected through structured questionnaires based on the modified APS-POQ to obtain responses from the patients. Both bivariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis was done to evaluate the association. P-value less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. The find of this study revealed that 74.5% of patients were satisfied with overall pain management services. Patients with ASA I (AOR = 2.3; 95%CI: (1.06-5.08), received multimodal analgesics (AOR 4.30; 95% CI: (2.02-9.18), no perceived pain (AOR = 6.7; 95% CI: (1.54-29.7), had pain discussion (AOR = 8.9; 95% CI: (3.67-21.90) and waiting for analgesia service less than 30 min (AOR = 6.3; 95% CI: (1.34-29.58) were more satisfied. The study shows that patient satisfaction with postoperative pain management was low in our setup compared to many studies. Thus, there is a need to improve the quality of pain management services in the study area.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Patient satisfaction with postoperative pain management is a vital tool for measuring the quality of care in health centers, which associated with the care process and care outcome. There is still few evidence on factor for patient satisfaction with postoperative pain management.
Objective
UNASSIGNED
These study aimed to assess magnitude of Patient satisfaction with post-operative pain management and associated factors among surgical patients at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, from Feb 1- Apr 30, 2021.
Method
UNASSIGNED
Institutional based cross-sectional study was conducted among 335 adult patients using a systematic random sampling technique. Data were collected through structured questionnaires based on the modified APS-POQ to obtain responses from the patients. Both bivariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis was done to evaluate the association. P-value less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
Result
UNASSIGNED
The find of this study revealed that 74.5% of patients were satisfied with overall pain management services. Patients with ASA I (AOR = 2.3; 95%CI: (1.06-5.08), received multimodal analgesics (AOR 4.30; 95% CI: (2.02-9.18), no perceived pain (AOR = 6.7; 95% CI: (1.54-29.7), had pain discussion (AOR = 8.9; 95% CI: (3.67-21.90) and waiting for analgesia service less than 30 min (AOR = 6.3; 95% CI: (1.34-29.58) were more satisfied.
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
The study shows that patient satisfaction with postoperative pain management was low in our setup compared to many studies. Thus, there is a need to improve the quality of pain management services in the study area.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35860062
doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104087
pii: S2049-0801(22)00847-0
pmc: PMC9289483
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
104087Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Références
Anesth Analg. 2019 Mar;128(3):555-562
pubmed: 30198924
J Pain Res. 2013 Sep 09;6:683-9
pubmed: 24049457
Pain Manag Nurs. 2014 Mar;15(1):116-25
pubmed: 23273825
Can J Nurs Res. 2020 Mar;52(1):25-30
pubmed: 31104483
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2018 Jul-Sep;16(3):1268
pubmed: 30416629
Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Jan;30(1):149-60
pubmed: 24237004
Int J Nurs Pract. 2016 Jun;22(3):232-8
pubmed: 25355297
J Pain. 2010 Nov;11(11):1172-86
pubmed: 20400379
J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2010 Apr;1(2):97-108
pubmed: 22247838
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Oct;19(10):1212-5
pubmed: 23035970
J Pain Symptom Manage. 1996 Apr;11(4):242-51
pubmed: 8869459
Pain Res Manag. 2020 Nov 12;2020:8834807
pubmed: 33273994
Pain Med. 2020 Feb 1;21(2):e164-e171
pubmed: 31609389
Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2020 May;14(2):73-81
pubmed: 32165329
Eur J Pain. 2001;5(2):125-33
pubmed: 11465978
Br J Pain. 2020 Feb;14(1):14-22
pubmed: 32110394
J Dermatolog Treat. 2012 Feb 14;:
pubmed: 22329617
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jan 25;19(1):68
pubmed: 30683083
PLoS One. 2019 May 1;14(5):e0215563
pubmed: 31042777
Pain Manag Nurs. 2012 Dec;13(4):186-93
pubmed: 23158700
Indian J Anaesth. 2016 Apr;60(4):248-52
pubmed: 27141107
Pain Med. 2015 Dec;16(12):2277-83
pubmed: 25917518
Pain. 2014 Jul;155(7):1401-1411
pubmed: 24785269
Int J Surg. 2021 Dec;96:106165
pubmed: 34774726