Long Day Wear Experience with Water Surface Daily Disposable Contact Lenses.
comfort
daily disposable contact lenses
end of day comfort
long wear time
water surface contact lenses
Journal
Clinical optometry
ISSN: 1179-2752
Titre abrégé: Clin Optom (Auckl)
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101730504
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
30
03
2022
accepted:
05
07
2022
entrez:
21
7
2022
pubmed:
22
7
2022
medline:
22
7
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The purpose of this study was to assess the wear experience of silicone hydrogel daily disposable contact lenses with water surface technology over a long day of lens wear. Thirty-five soft contact lens wearers were refit with the daily disposable study lenses and participants scored their initial impressions of comfort, vision and satisfaction using a visual analog scale (VAS). Participants used their smart phones to complete surveys of comfort and vision on a scale of 1-10 at 10, 12, 14, and 16 hours of lens wear on 5 weeknights. A participant score for each time point was calculated by averaging the evening responses. End of study VAS surveys of symptoms were also completed. Median (Interquartile Range) VAS initial impression scores were 99.00 (12.00) for quality of vision, 98.00 (16.00) for comfort, and 100.00 (13.00) for satisfaction. The end of study surveys found end of day median VAS scores of 87.00 (19.00) for end of day quality of vision and 75.00 (24.50) for end of day comfort. The median score for overall quality of vision was 93.00 (14.00) and for overall comfort was 93.00 (16.50). The median score for end of day dryness was 37.00 (55.00) and overall dryness was 13.00 (34.00). The daily disposable lenses with water surface treatment used in this study maintained high median scores for comfort and quality of vision for up to 16 hours of wear.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35860307
doi: 10.2147/OPTO.S367891
pii: 367891
pmc: PMC9292054
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Clinical Trial
Langues
eng
Pagination
93-99Informations de copyright
© 2022 Fogt and Patton.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Dr Jennifer Swingle Fogt reports grants from Alcon, Inc, during the conduct of the study; grants and/or personal fees from Alcon, Eyenovia, Nevakar, Unicon, Contamac, Innovega, and Bausch + Lomb, outside the submitted work. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.
Références
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2016 Jun;39(3):203-9
pubmed: 26639027
Eye Contact Lens. 2017 Jan;43(1):32-39
pubmed: 28002225
Cornea. 2007 Feb;26(2):168-74
pubmed: 17251807
Clin Optom (Auckl). 2022 Mar 04;14:27-34
pubmed: 35281321
Clin Exp Optom. 2017 Sep;100(5):473-481
pubmed: 28868803
Curr Eye Res. 2018 Jul;43(7):839-847
pubmed: 29630423
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Oct 18;54(11):TFOS7-TFOS13
pubmed: 24058135
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015 Jul;56(8):4403-12
pubmed: 26176877
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208
pubmed: 31078660
Eye Contact Lens. 2016 May;42(3):190-5
pubmed: 25996420
Mol Vis. 2015 Mar 15;21:293-305
pubmed: 25814827
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81
pubmed: 18929686
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2020 Jun;43(3):298-307
pubmed: 32098715
Clin Optom (Auckl). 2020 Jun 25;12:85-94
pubmed: 32612404
Optom Vis Sci. 2012 Mar;89(3):316-25
pubmed: 22227912
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2006 Mar;29(1):25-30
pubmed: 16448840
Eye Contact Lens. 2013 Jan;39(1):93-9
pubmed: 23266586
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2019 Oct;42(5):557-561
pubmed: 30890305
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2014 Aug;37(4):285-91
pubmed: 24709223
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2019 Aug;42(4):373-379
pubmed: 30878378
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Oct 18;54(11):TFOS37-70
pubmed: 24058138
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2016 Oct;39(5):342-52
pubmed: 27131891
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2019 Oct;42(5):533-539
pubmed: 30890306
Eye Contact Lens. 2021 May 1;47(5):271-276
pubmed: 33009260