Interspinous Process Devices Do Not Reduce Intervertebral Foramina and Discs Heights on Adjacent Segments.
foraminal stenosis
interspinous device
low lumbar back pain
lumbar decompression
spinal canal stenosis
Journal
Journal of pain research
ISSN: 1178-7090
Titre abrégé: J Pain Res
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101540514
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
15
01
2022
accepted:
13
06
2022
entrez:
21
7
2022
pubmed:
22
7
2022
medline:
22
7
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Interspinous process device (IPD) placement is an attractive treatment option for lumbar spinal and foraminal stenosis. The goal of the treatment is to release the stress on facets joints as well as decompress the nerve roots by enlarging the intervertebral foramina and narrowed canal recesses. To evaluate possible structural changes in the lumbar spine after implantation of an IPD on operated and adjacent segments. Twenty-two patients were enrolled in the study. Preoperative MRI scans of the lumbar spine evaluated recess and foraminal stenosis prior to the application of an IPD. CT exams were performed and morphometric measurements were made to assess the size of intervertebral foramina after implantation on the operated and adjacent segments. Statistically significant enlargements in diameter and surface area of the intervertebral foramen were seen at the operating level. On the right and left sides, foraminal enlargement after the procedure was 1 mm in diameter. The average enlargement of the foramina surface area at the level of implantation was 10 mm Decompression surgery using an IPD is effective in the treatment of lumbar foraminal and canal stenosis. It provides relief of symptoms in short-term observation through enlargement of intervertebral foramina and decompression of neural roots. It reduces overload of facet joints of the operated segment and does not decrease the size of the intervertebral foramina and disc heights of adjacent segments.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35860418
doi: 10.2147/JPR.S356898
pii: 356898
pmc: PMC9292060
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1971-1982Informations de copyright
© 2022 Krakowiak et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Références
Adv Orthop. 2013;2013:637362
pubmed: 23662209
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2014 Sep;34(5):502-8
pubmed: 24697967
Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2020 Jan;31(1):25-32
pubmed: 31739926
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 30;15(12):e0244571
pubmed: 33378405
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 13;9(2):e024944
pubmed: 30765407
J Invest Surg. 2015 Feb;28(1):40-9
pubmed: 25025237
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 6;13(7):e0199623
pubmed: 29979691
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2019 Jan;80(1):3-7
pubmed: 29758566
Int J Surg. 2017 Mar;39:57-64
pubmed: 28110031
Br J Neurosurg. 2021 Dec;35(6):757-765
pubmed: 32865435
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Feb 1;35(3):E96-100
pubmed: 20075767
Radiology. 1992 Apr;183(1):239-41
pubmed: 1549679
Spine J. 2020 Sep;20(9):1386-1396
pubmed: 32360761
J Orthop Translat. 2020 Sep 26;26:45-53
pubmed: 33437622
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015 Apr;101(2):215-9
pubmed: 25736197
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 01;11:CD012421
pubmed: 27801521
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Apr 1;30(7):744-9
pubmed: 15803075
J Spine Surg. 2015 Dec;1(1):2-18
pubmed: 27683674
Exp Ther Med. 2020 Sep;20(3):2743-2751
pubmed: 32765769