Maternal Smoking and the Risk of Placenta Accreta Spectrum: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Journal
BioMed research international
ISSN: 2314-6141
Titre abrégé: Biomed Res Int
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101600173
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
15
04
2022
accepted:
25
06
2022
entrez:
21
7
2022
pubmed:
22
7
2022
medline:
23
7
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This is the first meta-analysis that assessed the association between maternal smoking and the risk of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS), so this study was aimed at investigating the association between maternal smoking and PAS based on observational studies. PAS is defined as a severe obstetric complication due to the abnormal invasion of the chorionic villi into the myometrium and uterine serosa. We searched electronic bibliographic databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Science Direct, and Google Scholar until January 2022. The results were reported using a random effect model. The chi-square test and the Based on the random effect model, the estimated OR of the risk of PAS associated with smoking was 1.21 (95% CI: 1.02, 1.41; Our results suggested that maternal smoking is a risk factor for the PAS. There was no heterogeneity among studies that reported an association between smoking and the PAS. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to measure study quality.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
This is the first meta-analysis that assessed the association between maternal smoking and the risk of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS), so this study was aimed at investigating the association between maternal smoking and PAS based on observational studies. PAS is defined as a severe obstetric complication due to the abnormal invasion of the chorionic villi into the myometrium and uterine serosa.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
We searched electronic bibliographic databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Science Direct, and Google Scholar until January 2022. The results were reported using a random effect model. The chi-square test and the
Results
UNASSIGNED
Based on the random effect model, the estimated OR of the risk of PAS associated with smoking was 1.21 (95% CI: 1.02, 1.41;
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
Our results suggested that maternal smoking is a risk factor for the PAS. There was no heterogeneity among studies that reported an association between smoking and the PAS. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to measure study quality.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35860796
doi: 10.1155/2022/2399888
pmc: PMC9293521
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Review
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2399888Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Ensiyeh Jenabi et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declared that there was no conflict of interest.
Références
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Feb;33(3):471-481
pubmed: 29938551
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jul;205(1):38.e1-6
pubmed: 21419387
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014 Jan;27(1):24-9
pubmed: 23638753
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52893
pubmed: 23300807
Environ Health Perspect. 2012 May;120(5):746-51
pubmed: 22306530
Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Mar 1;139(3):449-451
pubmed: 35115435
Br J Radiol. 2021 Dec;94(1128):20210827
pubmed: 34538067
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2022 May 16;51(7):102406
pubmed: 35584759
Epidemiology. 2011 Jul;22(4):524-31
pubmed: 21516040
J Perinat Med. 2013 Sep 1;41(5):529-34
pubmed: 23612629
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Mar;208(3):219.e1-7
pubmed: 23313722
Harefuah. 2000 Apr 16;138(8):628-31, 712
pubmed: 10883200
Placenta. 2002 Feb-Mar;23(2-3):210-4
pubmed: 11945088
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2022 Jan-Dec;28:10760296211070580
pubmed: 34994211
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2020 May 14;13:1633-1642
pubmed: 32523363
Environ Health Prev Med. 2019 Jun 7;24(1):40
pubmed: 31174461
J Intern Med. 2021 Dec;290(6):1153-1179
pubmed: 34157165
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018 Jan;97(1):25-37
pubmed: 28963728
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Nov;225(5):534.e1-534.e38
pubmed: 33894149
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Nov;54(5):643-649
pubmed: 30779235
Biometrics. 1994 Dec;50(4):1088-101
pubmed: 7786990
Toxicol Lett. 2015 Jan 22;232(2):475-80
pubmed: 25481569
Womens Health (Lond). 2019 Jan-Dec;15:1745506519878081
pubmed: 31578123
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Nov 27;19(1):447
pubmed: 31775687
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 05;7(10):e017713
pubmed: 28982832
Eur Radiol. 2014 Apr;24(4):881-8
pubmed: 24272229
Environ Int. 2016 Jul-Aug;92-93:464-70
pubmed: 27164555
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022 Jun;157(3):647-653
pubmed: 34383328
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002 Apr;77(1):77-8
pubmed: 12053897
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Dec;61(4):733-742
pubmed: 30204619
Clin Nutr. 2021 Jun;40(6):4449-4455
pubmed: 33509666
Hypertens Pregnancy. 2018 Aug;37(3):168-174
pubmed: 30040502
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 3;10:ED000142
pubmed: 31643080
BMJ. 1997 Sep 13;315(7109):629-34
pubmed: 9310563
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Sep;193(3 Pt 2):1045-9
pubmed: 16157109
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017 Dec;30(24):2985-2990
pubmed: 27936997
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017 Aug;30(16):1963-1967
pubmed: 27623712
Placenta. 2020 Nov;101:39-44
pubmed: 32916477
Am J Perinatol. 2014 Oct;31(9):799-804
pubmed: 24338130