Assessing the genotoxicity and carcinogenicity of 2-chloroethanol through structure activity relationships and in vitro testing approaches.
1-Chloro-2-propanol
2-Chloro-1-propanol
2-Chloroethanol
Genotoxicity
Mode of action
Structure activity assessment
Journal
Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association
ISSN: 1873-6351
Titre abrégé: Food Chem Toxicol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8207483
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2022
Oct 2022
Historique:
received:
17
12
2021
revised:
16
06
2022
accepted:
08
07
2022
pubmed:
22
7
2022
medline:
21
9
2022
entrez:
21
7
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The detection of 2-chloroethanol in foods generally follows an assumption that the pesticide ethylene oxide has been used at some stage in the supply chain. In this situation the Pesticide Residues in Food Regulation (EC) 396/2005 requires 2-chloroethanol to be assessed as if equivalent to ethylene oxide, which has been classified as a genotoxic carcinogen. This review investigated whether this is an appropriate risk assessment approach for 2-chloroethanol. This involved an assessment of existing genotoxicity and carcinogenicity data, application of Structure Activity Based Read Across for carcinogenicity assessment, biological reactivity in the ToxTracker assay and micronuclei formation in HepaRG cells. Although we identified there is an absence of a standard oral bioassay for 2-chloroethanol, carcinogenicity weight-of-evidence assessment along with data on relevant structural analogues do not show evidence for carcinogenicity for 2-chloroethanol. The absence of genotoxicity was demonstrated for 2-chloroethanol and suitable analogues. In contrast, ethylene oxide showed reactivity towards markers indicative of direct DNA damage which is consistent with what is known about its mode-of-action. These data facilitate the understanding of 2-chloroethanol and given that it is not a genotoxic carcinogen suggest it must be assessed relative to non-cancer endpoints and a health protective Reference Dose should be established on that basis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35863484
pii: S0278-6915(22)00488-4
doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2022.113290
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Carcinogens
0
Pesticide Residues
0
Ethylene Chlorohydrin
753N66IHAN
Ethylene Oxide
JJH7GNN18P
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
113290Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Ashley Allemang, Stefan Pfuhler, Cathy Lester, Kirstin Kosemund, Catherine Mahony and Lara O’ Keeffe are all employees of a company that includes manufacture of food supplements.Thomas Roth and Henrike Peuschel are employees at SCC GmbH in Germany and were paid by Kappa Biosciences AS to prepare the ToxTracker assay part of the initial manuscript. Trygve Bergeland is a shareholder and employee of Kappa Bioscience AS.