Machine learning validation through decision tree analysis of the Epidemiology-Based Mortality Score in Status Epilepticus.
Epidemiology-Based Mortality Score in Status Epilepticus
mortality
prediction
prognosis
status epilepticus
Journal
Epilepsia
ISSN: 1528-1167
Titre abrégé: Epilepsia
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 2983306R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2022
10 2022
Historique:
revised:
18
07
2022
received:
22
03
2022
accepted:
20
07
2022
pubmed:
24
7
2022
medline:
14
10
2022
entrez:
23
7
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study was undertaken to validate the accuracy of the Epidemiology-Based Mortality Score in Status Epilepticus (EMSE) in predicting the risk of death at 30 days in a large cohort of patients with status epilepticus (SE) using a machine learning system. We included consecutive patients with SE admitted from 2013 to 2021 at Modena Academic Hospital. A decision tree analysis was performed using the 30-day mortality as a dependent variable and the EMSE predictors as input variables. We evaluated the accuracy of EMSE in predicting 30-day mortality using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC ROC), with 95% confidence interval (CI). We performed a subgroup analysis on nonhypoxic SE. A total of 698 patients with SE were included, with a 30-day mortality of 28.9% (202/698). The mean EMSE value in the entire population was 57.1 (SD = 36.3); it was lower in surviving compared to deceased patients (47.1, SD = 31.7 vs. 81.9, SD = 34.8; p < .001). The EMSE was accurate in predicting 30-day mortality, with an AUC ROC of .782 (95% CI = .747-.816). Etiology was the most relevant predictor, followed by age, electroencephalogram (EEG), and EMSE comorbidity group B. The decision tree analysis using EMSE variables correctly predicted the risk of mortality in 77.9% of cases; the prediction was accurate in 85.7% of surviving and in 58.9% of deceased patients within 30 days after SE. In nonhypoxic SE, the most relevant predictor was age, followed by EEG, and EMSE comorbidity group B; the prediction was correct in 78.9% of all cases (89.6% in survivors and 46.1% in nonsurvivors). This validation study using a machine learning analysis shows that the EMSE is a valuable prognostic tool, and appears particularly accurate and effective in identifying patients with 30-day survival, whereas its performance in predicting 30-day mortality is lower and needs to be further improved.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35869796
doi: 10.1111/epi.17372
pmc: PMC9804228
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2507-2518Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Epilepsia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International League Against Epilepsy.
Références
Epilepsy Curr. 2016 Jan-Feb;16(1):48-61
pubmed: 26900382
Epilepsia. 2021 Sep;62(9):e129-e134
pubmed: 34244997
Epilepsia. 1999 Jan;40(1):120-2
pubmed: 9924914
Neurology. 2007 Aug 28;69(9):886-93
pubmed: 17724291
Neurocrit Care. 2015 Apr;22(2):273-82
pubmed: 25412806
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Dec;50:388-393
pubmed: 34478944
Epilepsia. 2018 Oct;59 Suppl 2:170-175
pubmed: 30159870
Neurocrit Care. 2012 Aug;17(1):3-23
pubmed: 22528274
Epilepsia. 1997 Dec;38(12):1344-9
pubmed: 9578531
Epilepsy Behav. 2015 Aug;49:158-63
pubmed: 26092326
Neurology. 2014 Feb 25;82(8):656-64
pubmed: 24319039
Epilepsia. 2015 Oct;56(10):1515-23
pubmed: 26336950
Epilepsia. 2022 Oct;63(10):2507-2518
pubmed: 35869796
Shanghai Arch Psychiatry. 2015 Apr 25;27(2):130-5
pubmed: 26120265
Eur J Neurol. 2021 Aug;28(8):2694-2699
pubmed: 33932068
Epilepsy Res. 2011 Jan;93(1):1-10
pubmed: 20947300
J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83
pubmed: 3558716
J Public Health Res. 2018 Nov 08;7(2):1361
pubmed: 30581805
J Neurol. 2008 Oct;255(10):1561-6
pubmed: 18769858
Epilepsy Behav. 2020 Jan;102:106675
pubmed: 31766004
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006 May;77(5):611-5
pubmed: 16614020
Epilepsia. 1994 Jan-Feb;35(1):27-34
pubmed: 8112254
Epilepsia. 2019 Jan;60(1):53-62
pubmed: 30478910
Seizure. 2017 Mar;46:31-37
pubmed: 28226274
Arch Neurol. 2010 Aug;67(8):931-40
pubmed: 20697043
Crit Care. 2016 Jan 27;20:25
pubmed: 26812954
Lancet Neurol. 2016 Sep;15(10):1054-62
pubmed: 27571157