Phytotherapy known and applied by head-neck cancer patients and medical students to treat oral discomfort in Germany: an observational study.
German folk medicine
Head-neck cancer
Oral discomfort
Phytotherapy
Journal
Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology
ISSN: 1432-1335
Titre abrégé: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 7902060
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2023
May 2023
Historique:
received:
09
06
2022
accepted:
07
07
2022
medline:
14
4
2023
pubmed:
24
7
2022
entrez:
23
7
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Plant remedies are often used next to conventional standard of care by cancer patients. However, user rates are often underestimated and physicians usually feel not equipped to counsel patients. Hence, routinely recording the use of phytotherapy and sufficient knowledge on herbal medicine of the medical staff are required to improve the situation. Appraising the current state of knowledge of medical students may offer insight if education on herbals needs improvement. Here, we propose a simple anamnesis tool to assess knowledge and usage pattern of medical plants and demonstrate how to extrapolate symptom cluster participants associated with plants investigated in this study focussing on the common symptom of oral discomfort. By screening German literature (popular science, specialist's literature, books for the interested layman) on medical plants used for treating oral discomfort, we were able to deviate a list of plants most often recommended for treating oral discomfort and to develop an anamnesis tool to assess knowledge and usage of 16 different plants. A group of 120 head-neck cancer patients (under surveillance, after receiving treatment) and 168 medical students were questioned at a collaborating out-patient clinic and via an online survey, respectively, in 2020. Students were additionally asked to write down indications of the plants they used in daily life. Knowledge and usage pattern were compared between both groups. Primary component analysis and heat-map analysis were used to visualize common and distinguishing features. Network analysis and VENN diagrams were used to extrapolate data of the medical students' cohort. Head-neck cancer patients and students show similar knowledge. However, students used significantly more plants in daily life than patients (p < 0.001). Overall, the user rate of patients and students were 82.50 and 93.94%, respectively. The top five most commonly known plants were similar in both groups (Marticaria recutita L., Zingiber offinicale ROSCOE, Taraxacum Wigg. Calendula officinalis L.) with the exception of Salvia officinalis L. (patients' cohort) and Carum carvi/Cuminum cyminum L. (students' cohort). Despite this slight difference, usage pattern of the top five most commonly used plants was the same between the groups. Students' indications were compared to indications found in the literature, unmasking several differences between commonly practiced and written knowledge on German phytotherapy. Network analysis revealed, that students associated certain plants with corresponding symptom clusters (e.g., coughing, oral mucositis). The majority of surveyed cancer patients as well as medical students use phytotherapy for treating oral discomfort. Both groups know and use similar plants. However, indications of written folk medicine differ from the lived and practiced tradition.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Plant remedies are often used next to conventional standard of care by cancer patients. However, user rates are often underestimated and physicians usually feel not equipped to counsel patients. Hence, routinely recording the use of phytotherapy and sufficient knowledge on herbal medicine of the medical staff are required to improve the situation. Appraising the current state of knowledge of medical students may offer insight if education on herbals needs improvement. Here, we propose a simple anamnesis tool to assess knowledge and usage pattern of medical plants and demonstrate how to extrapolate symptom cluster participants associated with plants investigated in this study focussing on the common symptom of oral discomfort.
METHODS
METHODS
By screening German literature (popular science, specialist's literature, books for the interested layman) on medical plants used for treating oral discomfort, we were able to deviate a list of plants most often recommended for treating oral discomfort and to develop an anamnesis tool to assess knowledge and usage of 16 different plants. A group of 120 head-neck cancer patients (under surveillance, after receiving treatment) and 168 medical students were questioned at a collaborating out-patient clinic and via an online survey, respectively, in 2020. Students were additionally asked to write down indications of the plants they used in daily life. Knowledge and usage pattern were compared between both groups. Primary component analysis and heat-map analysis were used to visualize common and distinguishing features. Network analysis and VENN diagrams were used to extrapolate data of the medical students' cohort.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Head-neck cancer patients and students show similar knowledge. However, students used significantly more plants in daily life than patients (p < 0.001). Overall, the user rate of patients and students were 82.50 and 93.94%, respectively. The top five most commonly known plants were similar in both groups (Marticaria recutita L., Zingiber offinicale ROSCOE, Taraxacum Wigg. Calendula officinalis L.) with the exception of Salvia officinalis L. (patients' cohort) and Carum carvi/Cuminum cyminum L. (students' cohort). Despite this slight difference, usage pattern of the top five most commonly used plants was the same between the groups. Students' indications were compared to indications found in the literature, unmasking several differences between commonly practiced and written knowledge on German phytotherapy. Network analysis revealed, that students associated certain plants with corresponding symptom clusters (e.g., coughing, oral mucositis).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The majority of surveyed cancer patients as well as medical students use phytotherapy for treating oral discomfort. Both groups know and use similar plants. However, indications of written folk medicine differ from the lived and practiced tradition.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35870011
doi: 10.1007/s00432-022-04200-0
pii: 10.1007/s00432-022-04200-0
pmc: PMC10097744
doi:
Types de publication
Observational Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2057-2070Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2020 Apr;146(4):985-1001
pubmed: 31955287
Anticancer Res. 2014 Feb;34(2):943-8
pubmed: 24511037
Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2019 Nov;37:1-5
pubmed: 31445361
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2022 Nov;148(11):3175-3182
pubmed: 35092483
Support Care Cancer. 2008 Jul;16(7):763-9
pubmed: 18196289
Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2010 Nov;16(4):208-12
pubmed: 20920804
Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Jul 1;43(W1):W566-70
pubmed: 25969447
Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2016 Jul 29;41(241):47-49
pubmed: 27734822
J Altern Complement Med. 2017 Oct;23(10):805-811
pubmed: 28915061
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2013;:
pubmed: 23714511
P T. 2010 Aug;35(8):461-8
pubmed: 20844696
Ann Oncol. 2005 Apr;16(4):655-63
pubmed: 15699021
Fam Med. 2000 Apr;32(4):252-7
pubmed: 10782371
Rev Bras Enferm. 2018;71(suppl 6):2682-2688
pubmed: 30540044
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2020 Jul;18(7):873-898
pubmed: 32634781
Med Oncol. 2016 Jul;33(7):78
pubmed: 27300549
Br J Cancer. 2011 Mar 15;104(6):927-33
pubmed: 21364591