Patient and Clinician Perspectives on Shared Decision Making in Vascular Access Selection: A Qualitative Study.
Arteriovenous fistula (AVF)
central venous catheter (CVC)
decisional influences
dialysis initiation
end-stage renal disease (ESRD)
hemodialysis
individualized care
patient-centered care
qualitative research
shared decision-making (SDM)
unplanned dialysis start
vascular access
Journal
American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation
ISSN: 1523-6838
Titre abrégé: Am J Kidney Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8110075
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2023
01 2023
Historique:
received:
15
03
2022
accepted:
30
05
2022
pubmed:
24
7
2022
medline:
24
12
2022
entrez:
23
7
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Collaborative approaches to vascular access selection are being increasingly encouraged to elicit patients' preferences and priorities where no unequivocally superior choice exists. We explored how patients, their caregivers, and clinicians integrate principles of shared decision making when engaging in vascular access discussions. Qualitative description. Semistructured interviews with a purposive sample of patients, their caregivers, and clinicians from outpatient hemodialysis programs in Alberta, Canada. We used a thematic analysis approach to inductively code transcripts and generate themes to capture key concepts related to vascular access shared decision making across participant roles. 42 individuals (19 patients, 2 caregivers, 21 clinicians) participated in this study. Participants identified how access-related decisions follow a series of major decisions about kidney replacement therapy and care goals that influence vascular access preferences and choice. Vascular access shared decision making was strengthened through integration of vascular access selection with dialysis-related decisions and timely, tailored, and balanced exchange of information between patients and their care team. Participants described how opportunities to revisit the vascular access decision before and after dialysis initiation helped prepare patients for their access and encouraged ongoing alignment between patients' care priorities and treatment plans. Where shared decision making was undermined, hemodialysis via a catheter ensued as the most readily available vascular access option. Our study was limited to patients and clinicians from hemodialysis care settings and included few caregiver participants. Findings suggest that earlier, or upstream, decisions about kidney replacement therapies influence how and when vascular access decisions are made. Repeated vascular access discussions that are integrated with other higher-level decisions are needed to promote vascular access shared decision making and preparedness.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35870570
pii: S0272-6386(22)00777-6
doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2022.05.016
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
48-58.e1Subventions
Organisme : CIHR
ID : FRN162369
Pays : Canada
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.