Conceptualising public mental health: development of a conceptual framework for public mental health.

Co-production Conceptual framework Indicators Mental health Public mental health

Journal

BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
23 07 2022
Historique:
received: 25 09 2021
accepted: 04 07 2022
entrez: 23 7 2022
pubmed: 24 7 2022
medline: 27 7 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Numerous determinants have been linked to public mental health; however, they have not been brought together in a comprehensive conceptual framework. The goal of this work was to bring together academic research, practitioner expertise, and public perspectives to create a public mental health conceptual framework. The development process proceeded in four stages. First, we identified a comprehensive list of potential determinants through a state-of-the-art academic literature review, grey literature review, and created mind maps created by peer researchers. Next, we conducted in-person workshops, consultations, and an online survey with academics, practitioners, policy makers, and members of the public to review the potential determinants, nominate additional determinants, and prioritise determinants by importance for understanding public mental health. This iterative process resulted in the final list of determinants contained in the framework. We then conducted rapid reviews to define each determinant and to identify key research, interventions, and resources. Finally, we worked with a design team to visualise the conceptual framework as an online tool and printable infographic. We found substantial overlap between sources reflecting a shared understanding of the key drivers of public mental health. The unique determinants that emerged from each data source highlighted the importance of using multiple sources to create a comprehensive model. 72 potential determinants were prioritised through stakeholder consultations, resulting in a final list of 55 determinants and organised into four levels: individual, family, community, and structural. This is the most complete conceptual framework for public mental health to date, bringing together academic research, policy and practitioner views, and lived experience perspectives. The co-production processes and tools we used provides a template for researchers looking to include multiple perspectives in their research. The conceptual framework draws together current knowledge on each determinant, but also highlights areas where further research is needed to better understand the relationship between each factor and mental health, which can inform the research agenda. This online tool and infographic can be used by practitioners to identify interventions for promoting mental health, and by the general public as a resource to increase awareness of the broad factors which shape public mental health.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Numerous determinants have been linked to public mental health; however, they have not been brought together in a comprehensive conceptual framework. The goal of this work was to bring together academic research, practitioner expertise, and public perspectives to create a public mental health conceptual framework.
METHODS
The development process proceeded in four stages. First, we identified a comprehensive list of potential determinants through a state-of-the-art academic literature review, grey literature review, and created mind maps created by peer researchers. Next, we conducted in-person workshops, consultations, and an online survey with academics, practitioners, policy makers, and members of the public to review the potential determinants, nominate additional determinants, and prioritise determinants by importance for understanding public mental health. This iterative process resulted in the final list of determinants contained in the framework. We then conducted rapid reviews to define each determinant and to identify key research, interventions, and resources. Finally, we worked with a design team to visualise the conceptual framework as an online tool and printable infographic.
RESULTS
We found substantial overlap between sources reflecting a shared understanding of the key drivers of public mental health. The unique determinants that emerged from each data source highlighted the importance of using multiple sources to create a comprehensive model. 72 potential determinants were prioritised through stakeholder consultations, resulting in a final list of 55 determinants and organised into four levels: individual, family, community, and structural.
CONCLUSIONS
This is the most complete conceptual framework for public mental health to date, bringing together academic research, policy and practitioner views, and lived experience perspectives. The co-production processes and tools we used provides a template for researchers looking to include multiple perspectives in their research. The conceptual framework draws together current knowledge on each determinant, but also highlights areas where further research is needed to better understand the relationship between each factor and mental health, which can inform the research agenda. This online tool and infographic can be used by practitioners to identify interventions for promoting mental health, and by the general public as a resource to increase awareness of the broad factors which shape public mental health.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35870910
doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13775-9
pii: 10.1186/s12889-022-13775-9
pmc: PMC9308351
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1407

Subventions

Organisme : Department of Health
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s).

Références

Health Info Libr J. 2009 Jun;26(2):91-108
pubmed: 19490148
Health Place. 2018 Sep;53:237-257
pubmed: 30196042
Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2016 Jan;36(1):1-10
pubmed: 26789022
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2014 Aug;26(4):392-407
pubmed: 25137105
Public Health. 1988 Sep;102(5):431-7
pubmed: 3055005
Med J Aust. 2007 Oct 1;187(S7):S26-30
pubmed: 17908021
Clin Psychol Rev. 2014 Jun;34(4):337-57
pubmed: 24842549
Scand J Public Health. 2003;31(6):451-9
pubmed: 14675937

Auteurs

Jennifer Dykxhoorn (J)

Department of Primary Care and Population Health, UCL Division of Psychiatry, 6th Floor, Wing B, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK. j.dykxhoorn@ucl.ac.uk.
Division of Psychiatry, UCL, London, UK. j.dykxhoorn@ucl.ac.uk.

Laura Fischer (L)

Department of Primary Care and Population Health, UCL Division of Psychiatry, 6th Floor, Wing B, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.

Becca Bayliss (B)

Department of Primary Care and Population Health, UCL Division of Psychiatry, 6th Floor, Wing B, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.

Carol Brayne (C)

Cambridge Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Liam Crosby (L)

Department of Primary Care and Population Health, UCL Division of Psychiatry, 6th Floor, Wing B, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.

Bobbie Galvin (B)

Department of Primary Care and Population Health, UCL Division of Psychiatry, 6th Floor, Wing B, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.

Emma Geijer-Simpson (E)

FUSE, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, UK.

Oliver Jones (O)

The McPin Foundation, London, UK.

Eileen Kaner (E)

FUSE, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, UK.

Louise Lafortune (L)

Cambridge Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Michael McGrath (M)

Department of Primary Care and Population Health, UCL Division of Psychiatry, 6th Floor, Wing B, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.
Division of Psychiatry, UCL, London, UK.

Paula Moehring (P)

Department of Primary Care and Population Health, UCL Division of Psychiatry, 6th Floor, Wing B, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.

David Osborn (D)

Division of Psychiatry, UCL, London, UK.
Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, NW1 0PE, UK.

Mylene Petermann (M)

The McPin Foundation, London, UK.

Olivia Remes (O)

Cambridge Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Ami Vadgama (A)

The McPin Foundation, London, UK.

Kate Walters (K)

Department of Primary Care and Population Health, UCL Division of Psychiatry, 6th Floor, Wing B, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH