Validation of the 70-gene signature test (MammaPrint) to identify patients with breast cancer aged ≥ 70 years with ultralow risk of distant recurrence: A population-based cohort study.

Breast cancer Endocrine therapy Genomic risk profile Geriatric oncology Individualized treatment

Journal

Journal of geriatric oncology
ISSN: 1879-4076
Titre abrégé: J Geriatr Oncol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101534770

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 2022
Historique:
received: 13 12 2021
revised: 22 04 2022
accepted: 13 07 2022
pubmed: 24 7 2022
medline: 24 11 2022
entrez: 23 7 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

When risk estimation in older patients with hormone receptor positive breast cancer (HR + BC) is based on the same factors as in younger patients, age-related factors regarding recurrence risk and other-cause mortality are not considered. Genomic risk assessment could help identify patients with ultralow risk BC who can forgo adjuvant treatment. However, assessment tools should be validated specifically for older patients. This study aims to determine whether the 70-gene signature test (MammaPrint) can identify patients with HR + BC aged ≥70 years with ultralow risk for distant recurrence. Inclusion criteria: ≥70 years; invasive HR + BC; T1-2N0-3M0. HER2 + BC; neoadjuvant therapy. MammaPrint assays were performed following standardized protocols. Clinical risk was determined with St. Gallen risk classification. Primary endpoint was 10-year cumulative incidence rate of distant recurrence in relation to genomic risk. Subdistribution hazard ratios (sHR) were estimated from Fine and Gray analyses. Multivariate analyses were adjusted for adjuvant endocrine therapy and clinical risk. This study included 418 patients, median age 78 years (interquartile range [IQR] 73-83). Sixty percent of patients were treated with endocrine therapy. MammaPrint classified 50 patients as MammaPrint-ultralow, 224 patients as MammaPrint-low, and 144 patients as MammaPrint-high risk. Regarding clinical risk, 50 patients were classified low, 237 intermediate, and 131 high. Discordance was observed between clinical and genomic risk in 14 MammaPrint-ultralow risk patients who were high clinical risk, and 84 patients who were MammaPrint-high risk, but low or intermediate clinical risk. Median follow-up was 9.2 years (IQR 7.9-10.5). The 10-year distant recurrence rate was 17% (95% confidence interval [CI] 11-23) in MammaPrint-high risk patients, 8% (4-12) in MammaPrint-low (HR 0.46; 95%CI 0.25-0.84), and 2% (0-6) in MammaPrint-ultralow risk patients (HR 0.11; 95%CI 0.02-0.81). After adjustment for clinical risk and endocrine therapy, MammaPrint-high risk patients still had significantly higher 10-year distant recurrence rate than MammaPrint-low (sHR 0.49; 95%CI 0.26-0.90) and MammaPrint-ultralow patients (sHR 0.12; 95%CI 0.02-0.85). Of the 14 MammaPrint-ultralow, high clinical risk patients none developed a distant recurrence. These data add to the evidence validating MammaPrint's ultralow risk threshold. Even in high clinical risk patients, MammaPrint-ultralow risk patients remained recurrence-free ten years after diagnosis. These findings justify future studies into using MammaPrint to individualize adjuvant treatment in older patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35871138
pii: S1879-4068(22)00172-2
doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2022.07.006
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1172-1177

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest MK is an employee of Agendia. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Auteurs

Iris Noordhoek (I)

Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Surgical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Esther Bastiaannet (E)

Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Surgical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Nienke A de Glas (NA)

Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Josien Scheepens (J)

Department of Surgical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Laura J Esserman (LJ)

Department of Surgical Oncology, University of California San Francisco, United States of America.

Jelle Wesseling (J)

Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Astrid N Scholten (AN)

Department of Radiotherapy, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Carolien P Schröder (CP)

Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

Sjoerd G Elias (SG)

Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Judith R Kroep (JR)

Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Johanneke E A Portielje (JEA)

Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Miranda Kleijn (M)

Department of Medical Affairs, Agendia N.V., Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Gerrit-Jan Liefers (GJ)

Department of Surgical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. Electronic address: g.j.liefers@lumc.nl.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH