Treatment Strategy for Acute Cholecystitis Induced by a Metallic Stent Placed in Malignant Biliary Strictures: Role of Percutaneous Transhepatic Gallbladder Aspiration.
endoscopic biliary stenting
ischemia
malignant biliary obstruction
percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage
tumor invasion
Journal
Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)
ISSN: 1349-7235
Titre abrégé: Intern Med
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 9204241
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Mar 2023
01 Mar 2023
Historique:
pubmed:
25
7
2022
medline:
4
3
2023
entrez:
24
7
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Objective The present study evaluated the strategic role of percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder aspiration (PTGBA) for acute cholecystitis (AC) induced by a metallic stent (MS) placed in a malignant biliary stricture in comparison with percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD). Methods The treatment outcomes for 31 patients who underwent PTGBA as the initial intervention for MS-induced AC were evaluated and compared with those for 12 who underwent PTGBD. Results The technical success rate was 100% for both groups. PTGBA was ineffective for 11 patients, all of whom recovered with additional intervention, whereas PTGBD was effective for all patients except for 1 who died of sepsis (clinical success rate, 65% vs. 90%, p=0.16). Adverse events (AEs) were observed in only 1 case (3%) in the PTGBA group (mild bile peritonitis). Among the clinically effective cases, AC recurred in 20% of the PTGBA group and 33% of the PTGBD group (p=0.72). In the PTGBA group, the clinical success rate was significantly higher for patients without cancer invasion to a feeding artery of the gallbladder than in those with invasion (75% without invasion vs. 29% with invasion; p=0.036). According to the multivariate analysis, this factor was an independent factor for clinical success of PTGBA (odds ratio, 9.27; p=0.040). Conclusion Although the clinical success rate of PTGBA for MS-induced AC was lower than that of PTGBD, PTGBA remains a viable option because of its safety and procedural simplicity, especially for cases without tumor invasion to a feeding artery.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35871591
doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.9370-22
pmc: PMC10037011
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
673-679Références
J Gastroenterol. 2007 Jul;42(7):583-8
pubmed: 17653655
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Feb;85(2):357-364
pubmed: 27566055
Am Fam Physician. 2001 Jan 15;63(2):257-68
pubmed: 11201692
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2002 Jun;13(6):581-9
pubmed: 12050298
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018 Jan;25(1):41-54
pubmed: 29032636
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2019 Dec;30(12):1055-1061
pubmed: 31854311
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006 Sep;4(9):1148-53
pubmed: 16904950
Jpn J Radiol. 2019 Oct;37(10):719-726
pubmed: 31486969
Gut. 2020 Jun;69(6):1085-1091
pubmed: 32165407
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018 Jan;25(1):87-95
pubmed: 28888080
J Dig Dis. 2014 Dec;15(12):669-75
pubmed: 25233857
Br J Surg. 1999 Dec;86(12):1521-5
pubmed: 10594498
Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Oct;64(4):522-9
pubmed: 16996343
Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 Apr;65(4):735-7
pubmed: 17141230
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001 Apr;176(4):1025-31
pubmed: 11264103
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2012 Mar;19(2):187-93
pubmed: 21938408
Dig Endosc. 2018 May;30(3):380-387
pubmed: 29181859
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018 Jan;25(1):55-72
pubmed: 29045062
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004 Jul;183(1):193-6
pubmed: 15208137
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2020 Jun 03;29(2):143
pubmed: 32530978
Clin Endosc. 2019 May;52(3):262-268
pubmed: 30871312