Opportunities for Orphan Crops: Expected Economic Benefits From Biotechnology.

DREAMpy GMO crops economic surplus model impact assessment regulatory policy sub-Sahara Africa

Journal

Frontiers in plant science
ISSN: 1664-462X
Titre abrégé: Front Plant Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568200

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 30 11 2021
accepted: 03 05 2022
entrez: 25 7 2022
pubmed: 26 7 2022
medline: 26 7 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

An enabling, evidence-based decision-making framework is critical to support agricultural biotechnology innovation, and to ensure farmers' access to genetically modified (GM) crops, including orphan crop varieties. A key element, and often a challenge in the decision-making process, involves the balancing of identified potential risks with expected economic benefits from GM crops. The latter is particularly challenging in the case of orphan crops, for which solid economic data is scarce. To address this challenge, the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) in collaboration with local economists analyzed the expected economic benefits to farmers and consumers from the adoption of GM crops in 5 sub-Saharan African countries. This paper focuses on case studies involving insect-resistant cowpea in Nigeria and Ghana; disease-resistant cassava in Uganda and Tanzania; and disease-resistant banana in Uganda. Estimations from these case studies show substantial economic benefits to farmers and consumers from the timely adoption and planting in farmers' fields of GM orphan crops. Our analysis also shows how the benefits would significantly be reduced by regulatory or other delays that affect the timely release of these crops. These findings underscore the importance of having an enabling policy environment and regulatory system-covering, among other elements, biosafety and food/feed safety assessment, and varietal release registration-that is efficient, predictable, and transparent to ensure that the projected economic benefits are delivered and realized in a timely manner.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35873974
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.825930
pmc: PMC9297366
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

825930

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Zambrano, Wood-Sichra, Ruhinduka, Phillip, Nin Pratt, Komen, Kikulwe, Falck Zepeda, Dzanku and Chambers.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

JK was employed by Komen Bioscience Consultancy. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Res Eval. 2018;27(2):145-156
pubmed: 33487888
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Mar 22;12:605937
pubmed: 33828569
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 8;13(8):e0201803
pubmed: 30089159
GM Crops Food. 2014 Jan-Mar;5(1):44-57
pubmed: 24499745
Nat Biotechnol. 2018 Feb 6;36(2):137-139
pubmed: 29406500
Planta. 2019 Sep;250(3):677-694
pubmed: 31190115
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 27;12(7):e0181353
pubmed: 28749984

Auteurs

Patricia Zambrano (P)

International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, United States.

Ulrike Wood-Sichra (U)

Independent Researcher, Krems, Austria.

Remidius D Ruhinduka (RD)

School of Economics, University of Dar es Salaam, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

Dayo Phillip (D)

Centre for Agriculture and Rural Development Studies, Federal University of Lafia, Lafia Nigeria.

Alejandro Nin Pratt (A)

International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, United States.

John Komen (J)

Komen Bioscience Consultancy, Haarlem, Netherlands.

Enoch Mutebi Kikulwe (EM)

Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT, Kampala, Uganda.

José Falck Zepeda (J)

International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, United States.

Fred M Dzanku (FM)

Institute of Statistical, Social and Economic Research, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.

Judith A Chambers (JA)

International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, United States.

Classifications MeSH