Urethral Plate Characteristics in Cases of Non-proximal Hypospadias May Not Be Associated With a Higher Risk of Complications When a Two-Stage Repair Is Applied.
Thiersch-Duplay
children
distal hypospadias
hypospadias repair
mid-shaft hypospadias
non-proximal hypospadias
two-stage repair
urethral plate
Journal
Frontiers in pediatrics
ISSN: 2296-2360
Titre abrégé: Front Pediatr
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101615492
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
20
03
2022
accepted:
15
06
2022
entrez:
25
7
2022
pubmed:
26
7
2022
medline:
26
7
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To investigate whether a two-stage repair of distal- and mid-shaft hypospadias (non-proximal hypospadias) could eliminate the risk factors resulting from adverse urethral plate characteristics and eventually reduce complication rates. We retrospectively reviewed all cases of primary surgical repair of non-proximal hypospadias performed in our center between 2009 and 2018. In all cases where adverse urethral plate characteristics were found, such as meatal stenosis, a shallow urethral groove, a thick web of tissue between the native meatus and the urethral groove or in the presence of a very "thin," skin-like distal urethra, a two-stage repair was routinely undertaken. In cases of native meatal stenosis, a meatotomy, and meatoplasty were performed. In cases of a very "thin" distal urethra we incised the skin proximally up to the point of a normal urethral fold and a meatoplasty was performed at that point. Hypospadias repair was then performed in a second operation, 3-6 months following the first procedure. Urethroplasty, both in cases of a single-stage repair and in cases of a two-stage repair, was always performed using the Thiersch-Duplay technique. Patients with a follow-up of less than 12 months were excluded from this study. Over a period of 10 years, 208 boys underwent primary surgical repair of non-proximal hypospadias. Eighty-nine of the 208 patients (42.8%) underwent single-stage hypospadias repair. Two-stage repair of the hypospadias was required in 119 (57.2%) of the patients. The overall complication rate was 3.4% in the group operated in a single stage and 7.6% in the group that required a two-stage repair ( Patients with distal hypospadias and poor urethral plate characteristics repaired in a two-stage approach have comparable low-complications to those with favorable urethral plate characteristics repaired in a single-stage.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35874589
doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.900514
pmc: PMC9304744
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
900514Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Marcou, Bobbe, Wullich and Hirsch-Koch.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Semin Plast Surg. 2011 Aug;25(3):206-12
pubmed: 22851912
Front Pediatr. 2020 Dec 09;8:579364
pubmed: 33363061
J Pediatr Surg. 2013 Aug;48(8):1778-83
pubmed: 23932622
Pediatr Surg Int. 2010 May;26(5):519-22
pubmed: 20169443
J Urol. 1994 Feb;151(2):464-5
pubmed: 8283561
Urol Ann. 2016 Oct-Dec;8(4):403-408
pubmed: 28057982
World J Urol. 2021 Apr;39(4):1013-1019
pubmed: 32067073
J Urol. 1995 Oct;154(4):1505-7
pubmed: 7658578
Indian J Plast Surg. 2014 May;47(2):227-31
pubmed: 25190919
Urology. 1997 Mar;49(3):449-51
pubmed: 9123713
Transl Androl Urol. 2014 Dec;3(4):347-58
pubmed: 26813851
J Pediatr Urol. 2014 Apr;10(2):208-11
pubmed: 24439629
J Pediatr Urol. 2021 Jun;17(3):316-325
pubmed: 33846072
J Urol. 2000 Aug;164(2):489-91
pubmed: 10893631
Int J Urol. 2018 Jul;25(7):649-653
pubmed: 29717506
J Pediatr Urol. 2013 Dec;9(6 Pt B):1006-16
pubmed: 23491983
J Pediatr Urol. 2017 Aug;13(4):354.e1-354.e5
pubmed: 28676152
J Urol. 2009 Aug;182(2):682-5; discussion 685-6
pubmed: 19539316
Scand J Urol. 2021 Dec;55(6):466-473
pubmed: 34494931
J Pediatr Urol. 2021 Oct;17(5):681-689
pubmed: 34099397
Arab J Urol. 2016 May 08;14(2):163-70
pubmed: 27489745
BJU Int. 2004 Nov;94(8):1188-95
pubmed: 15613162
BJU Int. 2000 Apr;85(6):728-34
pubmed: 10759675
World J Urol. 2006 Aug;24(3):240-3
pubmed: 16523339
J Pediatr Urol. 2016 Feb;12(1):11-8
pubmed: 26515776
Urol Int. 2010;85(4):427-35
pubmed: 20847550
J Pediatr Urol. 2020 Oct;16(5):675-682
pubmed: 32830060
Urology. 2019 Feb;124:248-253
pubmed: 30243672
Arab J Urol. 2011 Dec;9(4):279-82
pubmed: 26579312
J Pediatr Urol. 2013 Dec;9(6 Pt A):707-12
pubmed: 23683961
J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Apr;11(2):54-9
pubmed: 25819601
J Urol. 2020 Aug;204(2):338-344
pubmed: 31971496