Urethral Plate Characteristics in Cases of Non-proximal Hypospadias May Not Be Associated With a Higher Risk of Complications When a Two-Stage Repair Is Applied.

Thiersch-Duplay children distal hypospadias hypospadias repair mid-shaft hypospadias non-proximal hypospadias two-stage repair urethral plate

Journal

Frontiers in pediatrics
ISSN: 2296-2360
Titre abrégé: Front Pediatr
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101615492

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 20 03 2022
accepted: 15 06 2022
entrez: 25 7 2022
pubmed: 26 7 2022
medline: 26 7 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To investigate whether a two-stage repair of distal- and mid-shaft hypospadias (non-proximal hypospadias) could eliminate the risk factors resulting from adverse urethral plate characteristics and eventually reduce complication rates. We retrospectively reviewed all cases of primary surgical repair of non-proximal hypospadias performed in our center between 2009 and 2018. In all cases where adverse urethral plate characteristics were found, such as meatal stenosis, a shallow urethral groove, a thick web of tissue between the native meatus and the urethral groove or in the presence of a very "thin," skin-like distal urethra, a two-stage repair was routinely undertaken. In cases of native meatal stenosis, a meatotomy, and meatoplasty were performed. In cases of a very "thin" distal urethra we incised the skin proximally up to the point of a normal urethral fold and a meatoplasty was performed at that point. Hypospadias repair was then performed in a second operation, 3-6 months following the first procedure. Urethroplasty, both in cases of a single-stage repair and in cases of a two-stage repair, was always performed using the Thiersch-Duplay technique. Patients with a follow-up of less than 12 months were excluded from this study. Over a period of 10 years, 208 boys underwent primary surgical repair of non-proximal hypospadias. Eighty-nine of the 208 patients (42.8%) underwent single-stage hypospadias repair. Two-stage repair of the hypospadias was required in 119 (57.2%) of the patients. The overall complication rate was 3.4% in the group operated in a single stage and 7.6% in the group that required a two-stage repair ( Patients with distal hypospadias and poor urethral plate characteristics repaired in a two-stage approach have comparable low-complications to those with favorable urethral plate characteristics repaired in a single-stage.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35874589
doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.900514
pmc: PMC9304744
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

900514

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Marcou, Bobbe, Wullich and Hirsch-Koch.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Semin Plast Surg. 2011 Aug;25(3):206-12
pubmed: 22851912
Front Pediatr. 2020 Dec 09;8:579364
pubmed: 33363061
J Pediatr Surg. 2013 Aug;48(8):1778-83
pubmed: 23932622
Pediatr Surg Int. 2010 May;26(5):519-22
pubmed: 20169443
J Urol. 1994 Feb;151(2):464-5
pubmed: 8283561
Urol Ann. 2016 Oct-Dec;8(4):403-408
pubmed: 28057982
World J Urol. 2021 Apr;39(4):1013-1019
pubmed: 32067073
J Urol. 1995 Oct;154(4):1505-7
pubmed: 7658578
Indian J Plast Surg. 2014 May;47(2):227-31
pubmed: 25190919
Urology. 1997 Mar;49(3):449-51
pubmed: 9123713
Transl Androl Urol. 2014 Dec;3(4):347-58
pubmed: 26813851
J Pediatr Urol. 2014 Apr;10(2):208-11
pubmed: 24439629
J Pediatr Urol. 2021 Jun;17(3):316-325
pubmed: 33846072
J Urol. 2000 Aug;164(2):489-91
pubmed: 10893631
Int J Urol. 2018 Jul;25(7):649-653
pubmed: 29717506
J Pediatr Urol. 2013 Dec;9(6 Pt B):1006-16
pubmed: 23491983
J Pediatr Urol. 2017 Aug;13(4):354.e1-354.e5
pubmed: 28676152
J Urol. 2009 Aug;182(2):682-5; discussion 685-6
pubmed: 19539316
Scand J Urol. 2021 Dec;55(6):466-473
pubmed: 34494931
J Pediatr Urol. 2021 Oct;17(5):681-689
pubmed: 34099397
Arab J Urol. 2016 May 08;14(2):163-70
pubmed: 27489745
BJU Int. 2004 Nov;94(8):1188-95
pubmed: 15613162
BJU Int. 2000 Apr;85(6):728-34
pubmed: 10759675
World J Urol. 2006 Aug;24(3):240-3
pubmed: 16523339
J Pediatr Urol. 2016 Feb;12(1):11-8
pubmed: 26515776
Urol Int. 2010;85(4):427-35
pubmed: 20847550
J Pediatr Urol. 2020 Oct;16(5):675-682
pubmed: 32830060
Urology. 2019 Feb;124:248-253
pubmed: 30243672
Arab J Urol. 2011 Dec;9(4):279-82
pubmed: 26579312
J Pediatr Urol. 2013 Dec;9(6 Pt A):707-12
pubmed: 23683961
J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Apr;11(2):54-9
pubmed: 25819601
J Urol. 2020 Aug;204(2):338-344
pubmed: 31971496

Auteurs

Marios Marcou (M)

Clinic of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.

Sarah-Magdalena Bobbe (SM)

Clinic of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Clinic of Urology, Dr. Lubos Kliniken Bogenhausen, Munich, Germany.

Bernd Wullich (B)

Clinic of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.

Karin Hirsch-Koch (K)

Clinic of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.

Classifications MeSH