Cranioplasty for Skull Defects With Polypropylene Abdominal Wall Mesh.
Journal
The Journal of craniofacial surgery
ISSN: 1536-3732
Titre abrégé: J Craniofac Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9010410
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Oct 2022
01 Oct 2022
Historique:
received:
11
02
2022
accepted:
18
03
2022
pubmed:
26
7
2022
medline:
12
10
2022
entrez:
25
7
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Cranioplasty is a well-established common surgery in the practice of neurosurgery and craniofacial surgery. In young patients, complete skull defect closure by bone splitting may be troublesome due to the difficulty to obtain enough bone area. In such cases, sometimes the authors need to use allografts, which may not be widely available in rural practice. In this study, the authors present the series of cranioplasty with polypropylene mesh, which is widely used in abdominal wall closure. Nine patients with depressed compound skull fracture were treated by performing this technique. Selection criteria were: compound depressed skull fractures in which bones were fragmented in a way not able to be reconstructed with and leaving a skull defect, small-sized or relatively medium-sized skull defects, and skull defects not located on the sharp curvatures of the skull which needs firm bended meshes. All patients were male and their ages ranged between 8 months and 36 years.The skull bone defect was reconstructed with polypropylene abdominal wall mesh, which was sutured circumferentially with the galeal tissue. Skull defects were successfully treated in all patients. The follow-up period ranged from 4 to 13 months. One patient with a history of alcoholism and neglectance developed a wound infection after 3 weeks of surgery. This patient was treated successfully with intravenous antibiotics without the need to remove the mesh. There were no complications in the remaining 8 patients. Polypropylene mesh is a cheap and effective material for the reconstruction of small-sized or medium-sized skull defects. It can be a good alternative in rural practice and/or low economic communities, when other cranioplasty materials are not available.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35876364
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000008767
pii: 00001665-202210000-00108
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Bacterial Agents
0
Dental Implants
0
Polypropylenes
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e764-e767Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 by Mutaz B. Habal, MD.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Références
Aydin S, Kucukyuruk B, Abuzayed B, et al. Cranioplasty: review of materials and techniques. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2011;2:162–167.
Abuzayed B, Tuzgen S, Canbaz B, et al. Reconstruction of growing skull fracture with in situ galeal graft duraplasty and porous polyethylene sheet. J Craniofac Surg. 2009;20:1245–1249.
Abuzayed B, Al-Abadi H, Jamous O, et al. Cranioplasty for skull defect with polypropylene abdominal wall mesh. J Craniofac Surg. 2021;32:e58–e60.
Abuzayed B, Alawneh K, Qawasmeh AL, et al. Modified bilateral pi craniotomy technique for reduction cranioplasty: novel technique. J Craniofac Surg. 2019;30:2593–2596.
Abuzayed B, Aydin S, Pekel F, et al. Postoperative headache severity after suboccipital craniectomy versus craniotomy. Neurosurg Q. 2013;23:116–121.
Kucukyuruk B, Biceroglu H, Abuzayed B, et al. Intraosseous meningioma: a rare tumor reconstructed with porous polyethylene. J Craniofac Surg. 2010;21:936–939.
Udo IA, Onwuezobe IA, Umeh KU. Resterilized polypropylene mesh for inguinal hernia repair. Niger J Surg. 2018;24:19–22.
Bronzatto E, Riccetto CLZ. Pro-inflammatory cytokines and metalloproteinase activation in polypropylene mesh implant in rat subcutaneous tissue. Int Braz J Urol. 2018;44:819–825.