Validity and Psychometric Properties of the ILO-WHO Workplace Stress Scale: A Study with Workers from the Canary Islands.

organizational stress work stress measurement work-related stress workplace stress

Journal

European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education
ISSN: 2254-9625
Titre abrégé: Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101751466

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
23 Jun 2022
Historique:
received: 09 05 2022
revised: 13 06 2022
accepted: 21 06 2022
entrez: 25 7 2022
pubmed: 26 7 2022
medline: 26 7 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Occupational stress, as a negative facet, is a pervasive problem with significant implications for organizations, employees, welfare systems and health. The implementation of measurement tools that can capture the different organizational dimensions that determine stress in workers is part of the stress management and troubleshooting strategy that every company must manage daily. The aim of the present study was to adapt and validate the 25-item version of the ILO-WHO stress scale by Ivancevich and Matteson in the context of the Canary Islands of Spain. The tool assesses specific organizational dimensions of work-related stress determinants: organizational climate and structure, leader influence, cohesion, territory, technology and group support. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) on a sample of 1510 Canary Islands workers was carried out. The results indicate that the job stress scale revealed adequate psychometric properties, construct validity and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.972), and it can be profitably used to measure stress. At the end of the paper, theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35877451
pii: ejihpe12070051
doi: 10.3390/ejihpe12070051
pmc: PMC9324391
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

677-691

Références

Educ Psychol Meas. 2018 Oct;78(5):762-780
pubmed: 32655169
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 14;19(4):
pubmed: 35206335
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 12;16(22):
pubmed: 31718087
Psychol Methods. 2011 Jun;16(2):209-20
pubmed: 21500916
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Dec 16;:
pubmed: 34918226
J Occup Health Psychol. 1999 Jul;4(3):288-92
pubmed: 10431288
J Occup Health Psychol. 1997 Jan;2(1):7-10
pubmed: 9552275
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jul 20;20(1):1143
pubmed: 32689996
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2021 Sep 16;11(3):1073-1087
pubmed: 34563093
Behav Res Methods. 2006 Feb;38(1):88-91
pubmed: 16817517
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2020 Jun;18(2):222-230
pubmed: 32398409
Eur J Psychol. 2021 May 31;17(2):28-42
pubmed: 35136427
Psicothema. 2017 May;29(2):236-240
pubmed: 28438248
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 28;17(11):
pubmed: 32481543
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 17;17(2):
pubmed: 31963612
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2021 Jan;34(1):1-21
pubmed: 32856957
Heliyon. 2022 Feb 01;8(2):e08868
pubmed: 35169645
J Occup Health Psychol. 2017 Jul;22(3):273-285
pubmed: 27732008

Auteurs

Juan Martinez Torvisco (JM)

Psicología Cognitiva, Social y Organizacional, Universidad de La Laguna, 38200 San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain.

Giuseppe Santisi (G)

Department of Educational Sciences, University of Catania, 95124 Catania, Italy.

Alice Garofalo (A)

Faculty of Human and Social Sciences, University of Enna "Kore", 94100 Enna, Italy.

Tiziana Ramaci (T)

Faculty of Human and Social Sciences, University of Enna "Kore", 94100 Enna, Italy.

Massimiliano Barattucci (M)

Department of Human and Social Sciences, University of Bergamo, 24129 Bergamo, Italy.

Classifications MeSH