Horses' attentional characteristics differ according to the type of work.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
30
08
2021
accepted:
01
06
2022
entrez:
25
7
2022
pubmed:
26
7
2022
medline:
28
7
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Attention is a central process of cognition and influences the execution of daily tasks. In humans, different types of work require different attentional skills and sport performance is associated with the ability to attention shift. Attention towards humans varies in dogs used for different types of work. Whether this variation is due to the recruitment of individuals suitable for specific types of work, or to the characteristics of the work, remains unclear. In the present study, we hypothesized that domestic horses (Equus caballus) trained for different types of work would also demonstrate different attentional characteristics but we also explored other possible factors of influence such as age, sex and breed. We exposed more than sixty horses, working in 4 different disciplines, and living in two types of housing conditions, to a visual attention test (VAT) performed in the home environment. Individual attentional characteristics in the test were not significantly influenced by age, sex, breed or conditions of life but were strongly related to the type of work. Riding school horses showed longer sequences and less fragmented attention than all other horses, including sport horses living in the same conditions. Interestingly, sport performance was correlated with attention fragmentation during the test in eventing horses, which may need more attention shifting during the competitions. Working conditions may influence attention characteristics indirectly through welfare, or directly through selection and training. Our study opens new lines of thought on the determinants of animal cognition and its plasticity and constitutes a further step towards understanding the interrelationship between working conditions and cognition.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35877616
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269974
pii: PONE-D-21-28059
pmc: PMC9312386
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0269974Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Br J Clin Psychol. 1994 Nov;33(4):535-47
pubmed: 7874045
Biol Psychol. 2019 May;144:28-36
pubmed: 30902565
Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 May;14(5):208-15
pubmed: 20207189
PLoS One. 2011 Feb 09;6(2):e14659
pubmed: 21347405
PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e44604
pubmed: 22970261
Int J Aviat Psychol. 1996;6(1):21-41
pubmed: 11539172
J Exp Psychol. 1980 Jun;109(2):160-74
pubmed: 7381367
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 8;12(2):e0170845
pubmed: 28178738
Behav Processes. 1997 Dec;41(3):257-66
pubmed: 24896858
Equine Vet J. 1980 Oct;12(4):197-210
pubmed: 7439145
J Anim Sci. 2014 Feb;92(2):844-55
pubmed: 24352963
Int J Psychophysiol. 2001 Jan;39(2-3):241-8
pubmed: 11163901
Animals (Basel). 2017 Feb 01;7(2):
pubmed: 28157145
Front Behav Neurosci. 2012 Aug 03;6:50
pubmed: 22876225
Front Psychol. 2014 Feb 13;5:108
pubmed: 24592244
Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd. 2007 Feb;149(2):77-83
pubmed: 17343134
Naturwissenschaften. 2017 Aug;104(7-8):61
pubmed: 28681089
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 Dec;107:540-559
pubmed: 31491471
Behav Processes. 2015 Jan;110:68-73
pubmed: 25251019
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39280
pubmed: 22761752
Psychol Rev. 1969 May;76(3):282-99
pubmed: 4893203
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 14;15(12):e0243970
pubmed: 33315932
Appl Ergon. 2021 Sep;95:103427
pubmed: 33895470
PLoS One. 2009 Oct 28;4(10):e7625
pubmed: 19862328
Neurosci Lett. 2009 Sep 29;463(1):98-102
pubmed: 19631256
Behav Brain Res. 2011 May 16;219(1):23-30
pubmed: 21168445
PLoS One. 2010 Apr 28;5(4):e10257
pubmed: 20442766
Curr Biol. 2014 Aug 4;24(15):R677-9
pubmed: 25093554
Behav Processes. 2009 Jul;81(3):416-22
pubmed: 19520242
Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2015;51(1):40-51
pubmed: 25857383
Infant Behav Dev. 2012 Dec;35(4):635-44
pubmed: 22982262
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 28;11(9):e0163360
pubmed: 27681684
BMC Vet Res. 2013 Oct 15;9:209
pubmed: 24128080
Behav Brain Res. 2009 Jun 8;200(1):100-5
pubmed: 19162081
Anim Cogn. 2010 Mar;13(2):197-205
pubmed: 19588176
Folia Primatol (Basel). 1999 Sep-Oct;70(5):264-8
pubmed: 10567831
Equine Vet J. 1995 Mar;27(2):86-91
pubmed: 7607155
Physiol Behav. 2008 Jun 9;94(3):487-90
pubmed: 18455205
J Equine Vet Sci. 2020 Nov;94:103250
pubmed: 33077097
Anim Cogn. 2015 Jul;18(4):937-44
pubmed: 25800170
Anim Cogn. 2016 May;19(3):565-70
pubmed: 26803607
Physiol Behav. 2011 Sep 1;104(3):454-63
pubmed: 21616087
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2008;11(3):249-66
pubmed: 18569222
Prog Neurobiol. 2011 Mar;93(3):385-404
pubmed: 21216272
J Comp Psychol. 2004 Dec;118(4):434-46
pubmed: 15584780
Child Dev. 1972 Sep;43(3):869-79
pubmed: 5056611
Hum Mov Sci. 2021 Dec;80:102880
pubmed: 34583141
Sci Rep. 2016 Jan 29;6:20117
pubmed: 26823123
Anim Cogn. 2012 Jul;15(4):623-30
pubmed: 22526687
Brain Cogn. 2019 Nov;136:103613
pubmed: 31561091
Front Psychol. 2014 Feb 07;5:71
pubmed: 24570668
PLoS One. 2011 Mar 30;6(3):e18331
pubmed: 21479184
Behav Processes. 2017 Jul;140:69-73
pubmed: 28366777
Equine Vet J. 1999 Sep;31(5):384-90
pubmed: 10505953
Behaviour. 1974;49(3):227-67
pubmed: 4597405
Behav Processes. 2016 Mar;124:93-6
pubmed: 26739514