Polarimetric biomarkers of peri-tumoral stroma can correlate with 5-year survival in patients with left-sided colorectal cancer.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 07 2022
25 07 2022
Historique:
received:
31
03
2022
accepted:
06
07
2022
entrez:
25
7
2022
pubmed:
26
7
2022
medline:
28
7
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Using a novel variant of polarized light microscopy for high-contrast imaging and quantification of unstained histology slides, the current study assesses the prognostic potential of peri-tumoral collagenous stroma architecture in 32 human stage III colorectal cancer (CRC) patient samples. We analyze three distinct polarimetrically-derived images and their associated texture features, explore different unsupervised clustering algorithm models to group the data, and compare the resultant groupings with patient survival. The results demonstrate an appreciable total accuracy of ~ 78% with significant separation (p < 0.05) across all approaches for the binary classification of 5-year patient survival outcomes. Surviving patients preferentially belonged to Cluster 1 irrespective of model approach, suggesting similar stromal microstructural characteristics in this sub-population. The results suggest that polarimetrically-derived stromal biomarkers may possess prognostic value that could improve clinical management/treatment stratification in CRC patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35879367
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16178-3
pii: 10.1038/s41598-022-16178-3
pmc: PMC9314438
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
12652Subventions
Organisme : CIHR
ID : PJT-156110
Pays : Canada
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Rawla, P., Sunkara, T. & Barsouk, A. Epidemiology of colorectal cancer: Incidence, mortality, survival, and risk factors. Przeglad Gastroenterologiczny 14(2), 89 (2019).
pubmed: 31616522
pmcid: 6791134
Bray, F. et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 68(6), 394–424 (2018).
pubmed: 30207593
doi: 10.3322/caac.21492
Stintzing, S. (2014). Management of colorectal cancer. F1000prime reports, 6.
Park, J. H., Richards, C. H., McMillan, D. C., Horgan, P. G. & Roxburgh, C. S. D. The relationship between tumour stroma percentage, the tumour microenvironment and survival in patients with primary operable colorectal cancer. Ann. Oncol. 25(3), 644–651 (2014).
pubmed: 24458470
pmcid: 4433525
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt593
van Wyk, H. C. et al. The relationship between tumor budding, tumor microenvironment, and survival in patients with primary operable colorectal cancer. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 26(13), 4397–4404 (2019).
pubmed: 31605345
pmcid: 6863941
doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07931-6
Toma, S. C., Ungureanu, B. S., Patrascu, S., Surlin, V. & Georgescu, I. Colorectal cancer biomarkers—A new trend in early diagnosis. Curr. Health Sci. J. 44(2), 140–146 (2018).
pubmed: 30746161
pmcid: 6320460
Das, V., Kalita, J. & Pal, M. Predictive and prognostic biomarkers in colorectal cancer: A systematic review of recent advances and challenges. Biomed. Pharmacother. 87, 8–19 (2017).
pubmed: 28040600
doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2016.12.064
Coppedè, F., Lopomo, A., Spisni, R. & Migliore, L. Genetic and epigenetic biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of colorectal cancer. World J. Gastroenterol. 20(4), 943–956 (2014).
pubmed: 24574767
pmcid: 3921546
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i4.943
Aghagolzadeh, P. & Radpour, R. New trends in molecular and cellular biomarker discovery for colorectal cancer. World J. Gastroenterol. 22(25), 5678–5693 (2016).
pubmed: 27433083
pmcid: 4932205
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i25.5678
Koncina, E., Haan, S., Rauh, S. & Letellier, E. Prognostic and predictive molecular biomarkers for colorectal cancer: Updates and challenges. Cancers 12(2), 319 (2020).
pmcid: 7072488
doi: 10.3390/cancers12020319
van Pelt, G. W. et al. The tumour–stroma ratio in colon cancer: the biological role and its prognostic impact. Histopathology 73(2), 197–206 (2018).
pubmed: 29457843
doi: 10.1111/his.13489
Park, J. H. et al. Evaluation of a tumor microenvironment–based prognostic score in primary operable colorectal cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 21(4), 882–888 (2015).
pubmed: 25473000
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1686
Van Pelt, G. W. et al. Scoring the tumor-stroma ratio in colon cancer: Procedure and recommendations. Virchows Arch. 473(4), 405–412 (2018).
pubmed: 30030621
pmcid: 6182321
doi: 10.1007/s00428-018-2408-z
Hynes, S. O. et al. Back to the future: routine morphological assessment of the tumour microenvironment is prognostic in stage II/III colon cancer in a large population-based study. Histopathology 71(1), 12–26 (2017).
pubmed: 28165633
doi: 10.1111/his.13181
Luu, N. T., Le, T. H. & Phan, Q. H. Characterization of Mueller matrix elements for classifying human skin cancer utilizing random forest algorithm. J. Biomed. Opt. 26(7), 075001 (2021).
pmcid: 8256999
doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.26.7.075001
Ueno, H., Jones, A., Jass, J. R. & Talbot, I. C. Clinicopathological significance of thekeloid-like’collagen and myxoid stroma in advanced rectal cancer. Histopathology 40(4), 327–334 (2002).
pubmed: 11943016
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2559.2002.01376.x
Ueno, H. et al. Prognostic value of desmoplastic reaction characterisation in stage II colon cancer: prospective validation in a Phase 3 study (SACURA Trial). Br. J. Cancer 124(6), 1088–1097 (2021).
pubmed: 33414540
pmcid: 7960987
doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-01222-8
Ueno, H. et al. Disentangling the prognostic heterogeneity of stage III colorectal cancer through histologic stromal categorization. Surgery 163(4), 777–783 (2018).
pubmed: 29162344
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.09.007
Okuyama, T. et al. Myxoid stroma is associated with postoperative relapse in patients with stage II colon cancer. BMC Cancer 20(1), 1–11 (2020).
doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07335-w
Cicchi, R. et al. From molecular structure to tissue architecture: collagen organization probed by SHG microscopy. J. Biophotonics 6(2), 129–142 (2013).
pubmed: 22791562
doi: 10.1002/jbio.201200092
Plotnikov, S. & Campagnola, P. J. Second harmonic generation microscopy for quantitative analysis of collagen fibrillar structure. Nat. Protoc. 7(4), 654–669 (2012).
pubmed: 22402635
pmcid: 4337962
doi: 10.1038/nprot.2012.009
He, C. et al. Polarisation optics for biomedical and clinical applications: a review. Light Sci. Appl. 10(1), 1–20 (2021).
doi: 10.1038/s41377-021-00639-x
Novikova, T., Pierangelo, A., Martino, A., Benali, A. & Validire, P. Polarimetric for cancer diagnosis imaging and staging. Opt. Photonics News 8, 28–33 (2012).
Antonelli, M. R. et al. Mueller matrix imaging of human colon tissue for cancer diagnostics: How Monte Carlo modeling can help in the interpretation of experimental data. Opt. Express 18(10), 10200–10208 (2010).
pubmed: 20588874
doi: 10.1364/OE.18.010200
Pierangelo, A. et al. Ex-vivo characterization of human colon cancer by Mueller polarimetric imaging. Opt. Express 19(2), 1582–1593 (2011).
pubmed: 21263698
doi: 10.1364/OE.19.001582
Pierangelo, A. et al. Use of Mueller polarimetric imaging for the staging of human colon cancer. Opt. Biopsy IX 7895, 65–72 (2011).
Roa, C., Du Le, V. & N., Mahendroo, M., Saytashev, I., & Ramella-Roman, J. C.,. Auto-detection of cervical collagen and elastin in Mueller matrix polarimetry microscopic images using K-NN and semantic segmentation classification. Biomed. Opt. Express 12(4), 2236–2249 (2021).
pubmed: 33996226
pmcid: 8086465
doi: 10.1364/BOE.420079
Hou, A. et al. Polarimetry feature parameter deriving from Mueller matrix imaging and auto-diagnostic significance to distinguish HSIL and CSCC. J. Innov. Opt. Health Sci. 15(01), 2142008 (2022).
doi: 10.1142/S1793545821420086
Ivanov, D. et al. Polarization-based histopathology classification of ex vivo colon samples supported by machine learning. Front. Phys. 800, 66 (2022).
Dong, Y. et al. A Polarization-imaging-based machine learning framework for quantitative pathological diagnosis of cervical precancerous lesions. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 40(12), 3728–3738 (2021).
pubmed: 34260351
doi: 10.1109/TMI.2021.3097200
Yao, Y. et al. Polarization imaging feature characterization of different endometrium phases by machine learning. OSA Continu. 4(6), 1776–1791 (2021).
doi: 10.1364/OSAC.414109
Dong, Y. et al. Deriving polarimetry feature parameters to characterize microstructural features in histological sections of breast tissues. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 68(3), 881–892 (2020).
doi: 10.1109/TBME.2020.3019755
Liu, Y. et al. Comparison between image texture and polarization features in histopathology. Biomed. Opt. Express 12(3), 1593–1608 (2021).
pubmed: 33796375
pmcid: 7984792
doi: 10.1364/BOE.416382
Westreich, J. et al. Novel methodology to image stromal tissue and assess its morphological features with polarized light: Towards a tumour microenvironment prognostic signature. Biomed. Opt. Express 10(8), 3963–3973 (2019).
pubmed: 31452988
pmcid: 6701544
doi: 10.1364/BOE.10.003963
Jones, B. et al. Novel quantitative signature of tumor stromal architecture: Polarized light imaging differentiates between myxoid and sclerotic human breast cancer stroma. Biomed. Opt. Express 11(6), 3246–3262 (2020).
pubmed: 32637252
pmcid: 7316019
doi: 10.1364/BOE.392722
Jones, B. et al. Peri-tumoural stroma collagen organization of invasive ductal carcinoma assessed by polarized light microscopy differs between OncotypeDX risk group. J. Biophotonics 13(11), e202000188 (2020).
pubmed: 32710711
doi: 10.1002/jbio.202000188
Sprenger, J. et al. Toward a quantitative method for estimating tumour-stroma ratio in breast cancer using polarized light microscopy. Biomed. Opt. Express 12(6), 3241–3252 (2021).
pubmed: 34221657
pmcid: 8221948
doi: 10.1364/BOE.422452
Haralick, R. M., Shanmugam, K. & Dinstein, I. H. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 6, 610–621 (1973).
doi: 10.1109/TSMC.1973.4309314
Chen, J., Cheung, H., Milot, L., & Martel, A. L. (2021). AMINN: Autoencoder-based multiple instance neural network improves outcome prediction in multifocal liver metastases. In: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, 752–761.
Liang, J., Bai, L., Dang, C. & Cao, F. The K-means-type algorithms versus imbalanced data distributions. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 20(4), 728–745 (2012).
doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2011.2182354
Omran, M. G., Engelbrecht, A. P. & Salman, A. An overview of clustering methods. Intell. Data Anal. 11(6), 583–605 (2007).
doi: 10.3233/IDA-2007-11602
Tian, X. et al. Recurrence-associated gene signature optimizes recurrence-free survival prediction of colorectal cancer. Mol. Oncol. 11(11), 1544–1560 (2017).
pubmed: 28796930
pmcid: 5664005
doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12117
Srinidhi, C. L., Ciga, O. & Martel, A. L. Deep neural network models for computational histopathology: A survey. Med. Image Anal. 67, 101813 (2021).
pubmed: 33049577
doi: 10.1016/j.media.2020.101813
Niazi, M. K. K., Parwani, A. V. & Gurcan, M. N. Digital pathology and artificial intelligence. Lancet Oncol. 20(5), 253–261 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30154-8