Non-hypervascular hepatobiliary phase hypointense lesions detected in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a post hoc analysis of SORAMIC trial to identify risk factors for progression.


Journal

European radiology
ISSN: 1432-1084
Titre abrégé: Eur Radiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9114774

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2023
Historique:
received: 20 05 2022
accepted: 29 06 2022
revised: 20 05 2022
pubmed: 27 7 2022
medline: 20 12 2022
entrez: 26 7 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To identify clinical and imaging parameters associated with progression of non-hypervascular hepatobiliary phase hypointense lesions during follow-up in patients who received treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma. A total of 67 patients with 106 lesions were identified after screening 538 patients who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI within the SORAMIC trial. All patients were allocated to the trial treatment according to the trial scheme, and 61 of 67 patients received systemic treatment with sorafenib (either alone or combined with locoregional therapies) during the trial period. Follow-up images after treatment according to trial scheme were reviewed for subsequent hypervascularization or > 1 cm size increase. The correlation between progression and several imaging and clinical parameters was assessed using univariable and multivariable analyses. On a median 178 (range, 48-1072) days follow-up period, progression was encountered in 18 (16.9%) lesions in 12 (17.9%) patients. In univariable analysis size > 12.6 mm (p = 0.070), ECOG-PS (p = 0.025), hypointensity at T1-weighted imaging (p = 0.028), hyperintensity at T2-weighted imaging (p < 0.001), hyperintensity at DWI images (p = 0.007), and cirrhosis (p = 0.065) were correlated with progression during follow-up. Hyperintensity at T2 images (p = 0.011) was an independent risk factor for progression in multivariable analysis, as well as cirrhosis (p = 0.033) and ECOG-PS (p = 0.030). Non-hypervascular hepatobiliary phase hypointense lesions are associated with subsequent progression after treatment in patients with HCC. T2 hyperintensity, diffusion restriction, cirrhosis, and higher ECOG-PS could identify lesions with increased risk. These factors should be considered for further diagnostic evaluation or treatment of such lesions. • Non-hypervascular hepatobiliary phase hypointense lesions have considerable risk of progression in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma receiving treatment. • T2 hyperintensity, cirrhosis, ECOG-PS, and hyperintensity at DWI are associated with increased risk of progression. • Non-hypervascular hepatobiliary phase hypointense lesions should be considered in the decision-making process of locoregional therapies, especially in the presence of these risk factors.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35881180
doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-09000-1
pii: 10.1007/s00330-022-09000-1
pmc: PMC9755078
doi:

Substances chimiques

Gadolinium DTPA K2I13DR72L

Types de publication

Clinical Trial Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

493-500

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s).

Références

J Hepatol. 2019 Dec;71(6):1164-1174
pubmed: 31421157
Radiology. 2018 Dec;289(3):816-830
pubmed: 30251931
Radiology. 2020 Aug;296(2):335-345
pubmed: 32484414
Liver Int. 2021 Dec;41(12):2986-2996
pubmed: 34242468
Hepatology. 2005 Jul;42(1):27-34
pubmed: 15954118
Eur Radiol. 2020 Mar;30(3):1624-1633
pubmed: 31776747
EJNMMI Res. 2021 Jun 2;11(1):51
pubmed: 34080071
Radiology. 2019 Sep;292(3):655-663
pubmed: 31310175
Eur Radiol. 2021 Mar;31(3):1608-1619
pubmed: 32827266
Eur Radiol. 2021 Jul;31(7):4492-4503
pubmed: 33409787
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2022 Feb;148(2):475-485
pubmed: 33855585
Clin Radiol. 2021 May;76(5):333-341
pubmed: 33461746
Hepatology. 2011 Dec;54(6):2055-63
pubmed: 21898496
Gastroenterology. 2004 Nov;127(5 Suppl 1):S144-52
pubmed: 15508078
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2017 Aug;40(8):1185-1195
pubmed: 28283704
JHEP Rep. 2020 Aug 24;2(6):100173
pubmed: 33103093
Hepatology. 2008 Jan;47(1):97-104
pubmed: 18069697
J Hepatol. 2013 Jun;58(6):1174-80
pubmed: 23376360
Radiology. 2013 Feb;266(2):480-90
pubmed: 23362095
Radiology. 1999 Jan;210(1):81-8
pubmed: 9885591
Eur Radiol. 2020 Sep;30(9):4762-4771
pubmed: 32333148
J Hepatol. 2018 Jul;69(1):182-236
pubmed: 29628281
Radiology. 1992 Jun;183(3):819-25
pubmed: 1316622
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Oct;209(4):781-789
pubmed: 28742376
Gut. 2018 Sep;67(9):1674-1682
pubmed: 29437912

Auteurs

Osman Öcal (O)

Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.

Christoph J Zech (CJ)

Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Matthias P Fabritius (MP)

Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.

Christian Loewe (C)

Section of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Bioimaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Otto van Delden (O)

Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Academic University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Vincent Vandecaveye (V)

Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Bernhard Gebauer (B)

Department of Radiology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Thomas Berg (T)

Klinik und Poliklinik für Gastroenterologie, Sektion Hepatologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Christian Sengel (C)

Radiology Department, Grenoble University Hospital, La Tronche, France.

Irene Bargellini (I)

Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.

Roberto Iezzi (R)

Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UOC di Radiologia, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Rome, Italy.

Alberto Benito (A)

Abdominal Radiology Unit, Department of Radiology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.

Maciej Pech (M)

Departments of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.

Antonio Gasbarrini (A)

Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Gemelli IRCCS, Universita' Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.

Bruno Sangro (B)

Liver Unit, Clínica Universidad de Navarra and CIBEREHD, Pamplona, Spain.

Peter Malfertheiner (P)

Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

Jens Ricke (J)

Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.

Max Seidensticker (M)

Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. max.seidensticker@med.uni-muenchen.de.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH