Switching from One Biosimilar to Another Biosimilar of the Same Reference Biologic: A Systematic Review of Studies.
Journal
BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy
ISSN: 1179-190X
Titre abrégé: BioDrugs
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 9705305
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2022
Sep 2022
Historique:
accepted:
05
07
2022
pubmed:
27
7
2022
medline:
23
9
2022
entrez:
26
7
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Multiple switches (transitions) between biosimilars of the same reference biologic are now a reality, and they are expected to become more common in the future as more biosimilars enter the market. Switching between two biosimilars of the same reference biologic is generally driven by affordability, formulary requirements, or the relocation/travel of the patient. Evidence of whether switching between biosimilars of the same reference biologic provides similar safety and efficacy profiles is reviewed here. A systematic search was undertaken using electronic databases (to December 2021): Biosis, Embase, MEDLINE, and EBM Reviews/Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews via Ovid. Publications were evaluated for effectiveness and/or safety data linked to switching from one biosimilar to another. The systematic search yielded 982 citations. After eliminating duplicates, 626 citations remained for the initial title/abstract screening phase. Following the initial screening, 240 records were chosen; more thorough examination yielded 35 citations. After comprehensive screening and expert advice, 23 studies were selected, of which 13 were published in peer-reviewed journals; the remainder have been published as abstracts. Overall, 3657 patients were included in these studies. All studies were observational in nature; no randomized clinical trials were identified. The studies were heterogeneous in size, design, and endpoints. Across the studies, data are provided on safety, effectiveness, immunogenicity, pharmacokinetics, patient retention, patient and physician perceptions, and drug-use patterns. The majority of studies examined switches between biosimilar infliximabs, although switches between biosimilar adalimumabs, etanercepts, and rituximabs were also identified. Two use-pattern studies and one case report were also detected and are discussed. Within the limitations of this systematic review, available data suggests that biosimilar-to-biosimilar switching is a safe and effective clinical practice, although it is not covered by current health authority regulations or guidance. No reduction in effectiveness or increase in adverse events was detected in biosimilar-to-biosimilar switching studies conducted to date.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Multiple switches (transitions) between biosimilars of the same reference biologic are now a reality, and they are expected to become more common in the future as more biosimilars enter the market. Switching between two biosimilars of the same reference biologic is generally driven by affordability, formulary requirements, or the relocation/travel of the patient. Evidence of whether switching between biosimilars of the same reference biologic provides similar safety and efficacy profiles is reviewed here.
METHODS
METHODS
A systematic search was undertaken using electronic databases (to December 2021): Biosis, Embase, MEDLINE, and EBM Reviews/Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews via Ovid. Publications were evaluated for effectiveness and/or safety data linked to switching from one biosimilar to another.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The systematic search yielded 982 citations. After eliminating duplicates, 626 citations remained for the initial title/abstract screening phase. Following the initial screening, 240 records were chosen; more thorough examination yielded 35 citations. After comprehensive screening and expert advice, 23 studies were selected, of which 13 were published in peer-reviewed journals; the remainder have been published as abstracts. Overall, 3657 patients were included in these studies. All studies were observational in nature; no randomized clinical trials were identified. The studies were heterogeneous in size, design, and endpoints. Across the studies, data are provided on safety, effectiveness, immunogenicity, pharmacokinetics, patient retention, patient and physician perceptions, and drug-use patterns. The majority of studies examined switches between biosimilar infliximabs, although switches between biosimilar adalimumabs, etanercepts, and rituximabs were also identified. Two use-pattern studies and one case report were also detected and are discussed.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Within the limitations of this systematic review, available data suggests that biosimilar-to-biosimilar switching is a safe and effective clinical practice, although it is not covered by current health authority regulations or guidance. No reduction in effectiveness or increase in adverse events was detected in biosimilar-to-biosimilar switching studies conducted to date.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35881304
doi: 10.1007/s40259-022-00546-6
pii: 10.1007/s40259-022-00546-6
pmc: PMC9485085
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
625-637Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Oct;108(4):734-755
pubmed: 32236956
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2019 Aug;28 Suppl 2:5-586
pubmed: 31429168
J Crohns Colitis. 2021 Dec 18;15(12):2011-2021
pubmed: 34089587
Future Oncol. 2020 Sep;16(25):1931-1939
pubmed: 32618476
Drugs. 2018 Mar;78(4):463-478
pubmed: 29500555
Br J Dermatol. 2020 Aug;183(2):397-398
pubmed: 32133618
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2020 Jul 17;26(8):e83-e84
pubmed: 32458993
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2022 Feb;52:151939
pubmed: 35027243
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2017 Dec;114(12):2696-2705
pubmed: 28842986
Clin Transl Sci. 2022 Jan;15(1):172-181
pubmed: 34523800
BioDrugs. 2020 Jun;34(3):297-306
pubmed: 32266678
BioDrugs. 2021 Jul;35(4):469-471
pubmed: 33974243
J Crohns Colitis. 2017 Jan;11(1):26-34
pubmed: 27927718
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2018 Feb 15;24(3):601-606
pubmed: 29462398
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Sep;54(5):678-688
pubmed: 34223654
BioDrugs. 2017 Apr;31(2):83-91
pubmed: 28120313
Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 Feb;77(2):165-174
pubmed: 28866648
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2021 Jan 19;27(2):182-189
pubmed: 32083291
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Feb 1;32(2):201-207
pubmed: 33369956
Crohns Colitis 360. 2021 Apr 26;3(2):otab022
pubmed: 36778941
Drugs. 2020 Feb;80(2):99-113
pubmed: 32002851
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011 May;33(9):987-95
pubmed: 21366636
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2020 Oct 5;8(1):1829883
pubmed: 33144928
BioDrugs. 2020 Aug;34(4):407-414
pubmed: 32691270
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2019 Dec 04;12:1756284819891081
pubmed: 31839806
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Jul;36(7):2170-2173
pubmed: 32578017
J Clin Med. 2021 Jul 30;10(15):
pubmed: 34362184
Drugs. 2021 Nov;81(16):1859-1879
pubmed: 34705255
Lancet. 2017 Jun 10;389(10086):2304-2316
pubmed: 28502609
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 16;11(1):5956
pubmed: 33727667
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2018 Sep 23;11:1756284818796956
pubmed: 30263065
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2022 Mar 30;28(4):495-501
pubmed: 34013959
Drugs. 2021 Nov;81(16):1881-1896
pubmed: 34596876
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Apr;53(8):887-899
pubmed: 33647174
BioDrugs. 2018 Oct;32(5):397-404
pubmed: 30269270
Am J Manag Care. 2022 Jul;28(7):329-335
pubmed: 35852882
BioDrugs. 2022 May;36(3):359-371
pubmed: 35596890
Front Pharmacol. 2020 Nov 12;11:572569
pubmed: 33536905
Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 May;105(5):1142-9
pubmed: 20389296
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2021 Apr 07;1:100008
pubmed: 35479506
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Sep;48(5):507-522
pubmed: 29873091
BioDrugs. 2019 Dec;33(6):621-634
pubmed: 31541400
J Crohns Colitis. 2013 Aug;7(7):517-24
pubmed: 22960136
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2020 Dec;50(6):1449-1456
pubmed: 32268935
RMD Open. 2021 Jun;7(2):
pubmed: 34099538
Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Feb;78(2):192-200
pubmed: 30396903
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Dec;21(12):e575-e588
pubmed: 33271114