Prediction of Acute and Chronic Mastitis in Dairy Cows Based on Somatic Cell Score and Mid-Infrared Spectroscopy of Milk.

clinical mastitis dairy cow mid-infrared (MIR) spectroscopy partial least squares discriminant analysis somatic cell count

Journal

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
Titre abrégé: Animals (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101635614

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 Jul 2022
Historique:
received: 14 06 2022
revised: 12 07 2022
accepted: 13 07 2022
entrez: 27 7 2022
pubmed: 28 7 2022
medline: 28 7 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Monitoring for mastitis on dairy farms is of particular importance, as it is one of the most prevalent bovine diseases. A commonly used indicator for mastitis monitoring is somatic cell count. A supplementary tool to predict mastitis risk may be mid-infrared (MIR) spectroscopy of milk. Because bovine health status can affect milk composition, this technique is already routinely used to determine standard milk components. The aim of the present study was to compare the performance of models to predict clinical mastitis based on MIR spectral data and/or somatic cell count score (SCS), and to explore differences of prediction accuracies for acute and chronic clinical mastitis diagnoses. Test-day data of the routine Austrian milk recording system and diagnosis data of its health monitoring, from 59,002 cows of the breeds Fleckvieh (dual purpose Simmental), Holstein Friesian and Brown Swiss, were used. Test-day records within 21 days before and 21 days after a mastitis diagnosis were defined as mastitis cases. Three different models (MIR, SCS, MIR + SCS) were compared, applying Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis. Results of external validation in the overall time window (-/+21 days) showed area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) of 0.70 when based only on MIR, 0.72 when based only on SCS, and 0.76 when based on both. Considering as mastitis cases only the test-day records within 7 days after mastitis diagnosis, the corresponding areas under the curve were 0.77, 0.83 and 0.85. Hence, the model combining MIR spectral data and SCS was performing best. Mastitis probabilities derived from the prediction models are potentially valuable for routine mastitis monitoring for farmers, as well as for the genetic evaluation of the trait udder health.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35883377
pii: ani12141830
doi: 10.3390/ani12141830
pmc: PMC9312168
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : FFG Comet-Project
ID : 872039

Références

Animal. 2012 Nov;6(11):1830-8
pubmed: 22717388
Animal. 2012 Oct;6(10):1694-701
pubmed: 23031566
J Dairy Sci. 2015 Aug;98(8):5740-7
pubmed: 26026761
J Dairy Sci. 2010 Jul;93(7):3065-9
pubmed: 20630223
J Dairy Sci. 2022 Jun;105(6):5167-5177
pubmed: 35346466
J Dairy Sci. 2008 Apr;91(4):1391-402
pubmed: 18349231
J Dairy Sci. 2014 Mar;97(3):1171-86
pubmed: 24440251
J Dairy Sci. 2012 Jan;95(1):139-50
pubmed: 22192193
J Dairy Sci. 2016 Jun;99(6):4816-4825
pubmed: 27016835
J Dairy Sci. 2002 May;85(5):1314-23
pubmed: 12086069
EJIFCC. 2009 Jan 20;19(4):203-11
pubmed: 27683318
J Dairy Sci. 2014 Sep;97(9):5863-71
pubmed: 24997658
J Dairy Sci. 2011 Dec;94(12):5776-85
pubmed: 22118068
J Dairy Sci. 2015 Apr;98(4):2150-60
pubmed: 25682131
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Oct;100(10):7910-7921
pubmed: 28755945
J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2020 Apr 17;11:39
pubmed: 32322393
J Dairy Sci. 1994 Jul;77(7):2103-12
pubmed: 7929968
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Nov;102(11):10460-10470
pubmed: 31495611
J Dairy Sci. 2020 May;103(5):4475-4482
pubmed: 32113764
J Dairy Sci. 2009 Jun;92(6):2444-54
pubmed: 19447976
J Dairy Sci. 2011 Apr;94(4):1657-67
pubmed: 21426953
Vet Res. 2003 Sep-Oct;34(5):475-91
pubmed: 14556691
J Dairy Sci. 2012 May;95(5):2765-77
pubmed: 22541507
Methods. 2021 Feb;186:97-111
pubmed: 32763376
Vet Q. 2007 Mar;29(1):18-31
pubmed: 17471788
J Dairy Sci. 2020 Apr;103(4):3264-3274
pubmed: 32037165
J Dairy Sci. 2006 Jun;89(6):1990-9
pubmed: 16702262

Auteurs

Lisa Rienesl (L)

Department of Sustainable Agricultural Systems, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, 1180 Vienna, Austria.

Negar Khayatzdadeh (N)

Department of Sustainable Agricultural Systems, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, 1180 Vienna, Austria.

Astrid Köck (A)

ZuchtData EDV-Dienstleistungen GmbH, 1200 Vienna, Austria.

Christa Egger-Danner (C)

ZuchtData EDV-Dienstleistungen GmbH, 1200 Vienna, Austria.

Nicolas Gengler (N)

Regional Association for Performance Testing in Livestock Breeding of Baden-Wuerttemberg (LKV-Baden-Wuerttemberg), 70067 Stuttgart, Germany.

Clément Grelet (C)

Walloon Agricultural Research Center (CRA-W), 5030 Gembloux, Belgium.

Laura Monica Dale (LM)

Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, Université de Liège (ULg), 5030 Gembloux, Belgium.

Andreas Werner (A)

Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, Université de Liège (ULg), 5030 Gembloux, Belgium.

Franz-Josef Auer (FJ)

LKV Austria Gemeinnützige GmbH, 1200 Vienna, Austria.

Julie Leblois (J)

Elevéo (Awé Groupe), 5590 Ciney, Belgium.

Johann Sölkner (J)

Department of Sustainable Agricultural Systems, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, 1180 Vienna, Austria.

Classifications MeSH