Hospital Restraints: Safe or Dangerous? A Case of Hospital Death Due to Asphyxia from the Use of Mechanical Restraints.
accidental death
asphyxia
forensic autopsy
forensic science
means of restraint
surveillance
Journal
International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 07 2022
10 07 2022
Historique:
received:
13
06
2022
revised:
07
07
2022
accepted:
08
07
2022
entrez:
27
7
2022
pubmed:
28
7
2022
medline:
29
7
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Asphyxia can be defined as an impediment to the influx of air into the respiratory tract, leading to tissue hypoxia. By restraint, we mean the use of physical, pharmacological and/or environmental means to limit the subject's ability to move. Fall prevention is the main reason restraint is used. Unfortunately, restraint can sometimes be fatal. There are few studies in the literature on this subject. We report the case of a man with Down syndrome in a psychiatric clinic found dead between the bed and the floor of the room where he was hospitalized. The analysis of the scene showed the presence of a means of a restraint, located around the man's chest and neck, which kept him tied to the bed and applied a constricting mechanical action. There was doubt as to the cause of death. For this reason, an inspection of the scene and an autopsy were carried out. Upon opening the chest, blood infiltration of the left intercostal muscles that was topographically compatible with external cutaneous excoriation (sign of restraint) became evident. In view of the danger of using restraint, it is necessary to evaluate the means of restraint as an extraordinary and not an ordinary procedure in patient management. Each patient undergoing restraint measures must be carefully monitored by specialized personnel. Greater surveillance of the nurse/patient ratio is necessary to reduce the use of restraints. In this case report, we highlight the lack of surveillance of patients subjected to restraint.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35886284
pii: ijerph19148432
doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148432
pmc: PMC9322702
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Jul 6;20(1):233
pubmed: 32631236
Nurs Health Sci. 2001 Mar;3(1):29-34
pubmed: 11882175
Psychol Serv. 2022 Nov;19(4):658-670
pubmed: 35130009
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002 Jan;50(1):90-6
pubmed: 12028252
Behav Sci (Basel). 2020 May 28;10(6):
pubmed: 32481496
Med Leg J. 2020 Jul;88(2):66-68
pubmed: 32507030
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2022 Feb 15;30(3):299-333
pubmed: 37346061
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2007;39(1):38-45
pubmed: 17393964
Int J Legal Med. 2018 Jul;132(4):1225-1230
pubmed: 29052041
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2020 Dec;16(4):680-692
pubmed: 32827300
Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2001 Jun;22(2):139-49
pubmed: 11394747
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011 Feb;59(2):333-9
pubmed: 21314651
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1998 Jan;53(1):M47-52
pubmed: 9467433
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004 Sep;59(9):M922-3
pubmed: 15472156
Int J Nurs Stud. 2013 May;50(5):603-12
pubmed: 23123034
Nurs Stand. 2002 Mar 20-26;16(27):33-6
pubmed: 11949566
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2005 Feb;38(1):19-25
pubmed: 15756483
Indian J Psychiatry. 2019 Apr;61(Suppl 4):S698-S705
pubmed: 31040460
Gerontologist. 1997 Dec;37(6):737-47
pubmed: 9432990