Environmental Assessment of Carbon Concrete Based on Life-Cycle Wide Climate, Material, Energy and Water Footprints.

carbon fibers concrete life cycle assessment lightweight constructions rebar steel resource footprints

Journal

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1996-1944
Titre abrégé: Materials (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101555929

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 Jul 2022
Historique:
received: 06 05 2022
revised: 21 06 2022
accepted: 04 07 2022
entrez: 27 7 2022
pubmed: 28 7 2022
medline: 28 7 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The construction industry contributes a major share to global warming and resource consumption. Steel-reinforced concrete (SC) is the world's most important building material, with over 100 million cubic meters used per year in Germany. In order to achieve a resource-efficient and climate-friendly construction sector, innovative technologies and the substitution of materials are required. Carbon concrete (CC) is a composite material made of concrete and a reinforcement of carbon fibers. Due to the non-rusting and high-strength carbon reinforcement, a much longer life-time can be expected than with today's designs. In addition, the tensile strength of carbon fibers is about six times higher than that of steel, so CC can be designed with a relatively lower concrete content, thus saving cement and aggregates. This research analyzes and compares SC with CC over its entire life-cycle with regard to its climate, material, energy, and water footprints. The assessment is done on material and building level. The results show that the production phase contributes majorly to the environmental impacts. The reinforcements made from rebar steel or carbon fibers make a significant contribution, in particular to the climate, energy, and water footprint. The material footprint is mainly determined by cement and aggregates production. The comparison on the building level, using a pedestrian bridge as an example, shows that the footprints of the CC bridge are lower compared to the SC bridge. The highest saving of 64% is in the material footprint. The water footprint is reduced by 46% and the energy and climate footprint by 26 to 27%. The production of carbon fibers makes a significant contribution of 37% to the climate footprint.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35888321
pii: ma15144855
doi: 10.3390/ma15144855
pmc: PMC9324627
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Références

Environ Sci Technol. 2006 Feb 1;40(3):641-8
pubmed: 16509298
Materials (Basel). 2019 Mar 13;12(6):
pubmed: 30871243
Materials (Basel). 2019 Sep 04;12(18):
pubmed: 31487805
Materials (Basel). 2019 Sep 29;12(19):
pubmed: 31569478

Auteurs

Clemens Mostert (C)

Center for Environmental Systems Research (CESR), Kassel Institute for Sustainability, University of Kassel, 34109 Kassel, Germany.

Jannik Bock (J)

Center for Environmental Systems Research (CESR), Kassel Institute for Sustainability, University of Kassel, 34109 Kassel, Germany.

Husam Sameer (H)

Center for Environmental Systems Research (CESR), Kassel Institute for Sustainability, University of Kassel, 34109 Kassel, Germany.

Stefan Bringezu (S)

Center for Environmental Systems Research (CESR), Kassel Institute for Sustainability, University of Kassel, 34109 Kassel, Germany.

Classifications MeSH