Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Modeling to Predict PET Image Quality of Three Generations EGFR TKI in Advanced-Stage NSCLC Patients.
EGFR TKI
NSCLC
PBPK modeling
PET/CT
Journal
Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1424-8247
Titre abrégé: Pharmaceuticals (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238453
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Jun 2022
27 Jun 2022
Historique:
received:
30
05
2022
revised:
18
06
2022
accepted:
21
06
2022
entrez:
27
7
2022
pubmed:
28
7
2022
medline:
28
7
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutated NSCLC is best treated using an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). The presence and accessibility of EGFR overexpression and mutation in NSCLC can be determined using radiolabeled EGFR TKI PET/CT. However, recent research has shown a significant difference between image qualities (i.e., tumor-to-lung contrast) in three generation EGFR TKIs: Relevant physicochemical and drug specific properties (e.g., pKa, lipophilicity, target binding) for each TKI were collected and applied in established base PBPK models. Key hallmarks of NSCLC include: immune tumor deprivation, unaltered tumor perfusion and an acidic tumor environment. Model accuracy was demonstrated by calculating the prediction error (PE) between predicted tissue-to-blood ratios (TBR) and measured PET-image-derived TBR. Sensitivity analysis was performed by excluding each key component and comparing the PE with the final mechanistical PBPK model predictions. The developed PBPK models were able to predict tumor-to-lung contrast for all EGFR-TKIs within threefold of observed PET image ratios (PE tumor-to-lung ratio of -90%, +44% and -6.3% for erlotinib, afatinib and osimertinib, respectively). Furthermore, the models depicted agreeable whole-body distribution, showing high tissue distribution for osimertinib and afatinib and low tissue distribution at high blood concentrations for erlotinib (mean PE, of -10.5%, range -158%-+190%, for all tissues). The developed PBPK models adequately predicted the image quality of afatinib and osimertinib and erlotinib. Some deviations in predicted whole-body TBR lead to new hypotheses, such as increased affinity for mutated EGFR and active influx transport (erlotinib into excreting tissues) or active efflux (afatinib from brain), which is currently unaccounted for. In the future, PBPK models may be used to predict the image quality of new tracers.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35890095
pii: ph15070796
doi: 10.3390/ph15070796
pmc: PMC9315544
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Oncotarget. 2015 Nov 17;6(36):38789-803
pubmed: 26515464
Eur J Pharm Sci. 2017 Nov 15;109:419-430
pubmed: 28823852
Clin Cancer Res. 2021 Jan 1;27(1):189-201
pubmed: 33028591
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 Jan;71(1):7-33
pubmed: 33433946
Pharm Res. 2022 Jul;39(7):1343-1361
pubmed: 35258766
Clin Cancer Res. 2013 Jan 1;19(1):183-93
pubmed: 23136193
Drug Metab Dispos. 2007 Aug;35(8):1325-32
pubmed: 17470525
J Pharm Sci. 2006 Jun;95(6):1238-57
pubmed: 16639716
Curr Drug Metab. 2013 Feb;14(2):226-38
pubmed: 23092311
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Apr 01;12(4):
pubmed: 35453931
J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Sep 7;36(1):122
pubmed: 28882160
Drug Metab Dispos. 2006 Mar;34(3):420-6
pubmed: 16381666
J Pharm Sci. 2005 Jun;94(6):1259-76
pubmed: 15858854
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249
pubmed: 33538338
CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jan;70(1):7-30
pubmed: 31912902
Lung Cancer. 2021 May;155:156-162
pubmed: 33836373
Traffic. 2020 Jan;21(1):60-75
pubmed: 31808235
Oncotarget. 2017 Sep 13;8(44):77897-77914
pubmed: 29100434
Drug Metab Dispos. 2021 Jan;49(1):53-61
pubmed: 33148688
Onco Targets Ther. 2013;6:135-43
pubmed: 23493883
J Pharm Pharmacol. 2012 Mar;64(3):383-96
pubmed: 22309270
BMC Cancer. 2021 Jan 5;21(1):5
pubmed: 33402117
Int J Cancer. 2019 Jul 1;145(1):284-294
pubmed: 30613959
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010 Mar;1804(3):559-66
pubmed: 20026433
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Apr 30;21(9):
pubmed: 32365759
Drug Metab Dispos. 2002 Aug;30(8):883-91
pubmed: 12124305
EJNMMI Res. 2018 Aug 16;8(1):81
pubmed: 30116910
Ann Oncol. 2018 Oct 1;29(Suppl 4):iv192-iv237
pubmed: 30285222
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2012 Dec;39(6):683-710
pubmed: 23184417
Drug Metab Dispos. 2019 Jan;47(1):49-57
pubmed: 30409837
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2021 Sep;10(9):3823-3839
pubmed: 34733631
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2005 Dec;60(6):581-3
pubmed: 16305581
Explor Target Antitumor Ther. 2020;1(2):71-100
pubmed: 36046070
Cancer Discov. 2018 Mar;8(3):304-319
pubmed: 29196464
Lung Cancer. 2017 May;107:1-13
pubmed: 27319335
N Engl J Med. 1971 Nov 18;285(21):1182-6
pubmed: 4938153
Cancers (Basel). 2018 Dec 10;10(12):
pubmed: 30544701
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Sep 17;110(38):E3595-604
pubmed: 24019492
Curr Med Chem. 2009;16(16):1964-77
pubmed: 19519376
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2017 Mar;56(3):235-250
pubmed: 27470518
Cancer Cell. 2007 Mar;11(3):217-27
pubmed: 17349580
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2014 Apr;73(4):759-70
pubmed: 24522402
EJNMMI Res. 2020 Aug 17;10(1):97
pubmed: 32804306
J Nucl Med. 2016 Jun;57(6):861-6
pubmed: 26848174
EJNMMI Res. 2016 Dec;6(1):10
pubmed: 26857779
J Clin Oncol. 2005 May 10;23(14):3243-56
pubmed: 15886312