The university students' self-regulated effort, flexibility and satisfaction in distance education.
Distance education
Flexibility
Satisfaction
Self-regulation
University students
Journal
International journal of educational technology in higher education
ISSN: 2365-9440
Titre abrégé: Int J Educ Technol High Educ
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 9918284166106676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
15
12
2021
accepted:
21
03
2022
entrez:
27
7
2022
pubmed:
28
7
2022
medline:
28
7
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Distance education offers flexible learning opportunities in terms of time, place and learning speed to teachers and students through internet technologies. However, the learning opportunities provided in distance education environments require students to act more autonomously and take more responsibility for regulating their learning processes to achieve their learning goals. For this reason, it is crucial to reveal the relationships between flexibility, self-regulated effort and satisfaction factors to provide efficient and effective learning environments in distance education. Accordingly, within the scope of this study, it is aimed to investigate university students' perceptions of flexibility, self-regulated effort and satisfaction with the distance education process, and their views on distance education. Survey research was used as the research method in the study. The study sample consisted of 1760 university students studying at 28 different universities. Data were analysed using t-test, ANOVA, and regression methods. As a result of the study, male students were more satisfied with distance education than female students, and education faculty students had the highest level of satisfaction. In addition, self-regulated effort and flexibility variables were significant factors affecting students' satisfaction towards distance education. Furthermore, the advantages and problems of distance education and suggestions for future distance learning environments were presented in the light of students views. Finally, the study's implications and various recommendations for practitioners and researchers were discussed in detail.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35891707
doi: 10.1186/s41239-022-00342-w
pii: 342
pmc: PMC9303047
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
35Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2022.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Références
Med Educ. 2021 Mar;55(3):293-308
pubmed: 32881047
Int J Educ Technol High Educ. 2021;18(1):57
pubmed: 34778542
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 4;14(10):e0223607
pubmed: 31584994
Int J Educ Technol High Educ. 2021;18(1):14
pubmed: 34778520
Int J Educ Technol High Educ. 2021;18(1):43
pubmed: 34778533