Three-Dimensional Printing Technology in Orthodontics for Dental Models: A Systematic Review.
3D printing
accuracy
dental casts
dental models
dentistry
orthodontics
systematic review
three-dimensional printing
Journal
Children (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2227-9067
Titre abrégé: Children (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101648936
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 Jul 2022
23 Jul 2022
Historique:
received:
17
06
2022
revised:
20
07
2022
accepted:
21
07
2022
entrez:
27
7
2022
pubmed:
28
7
2022
medline:
28
7
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Three-dimensional printing technology is an additive manufacturing technology that is used to reconstruct 3D objects. In the last decade, it has been rapidly involved in dentistry and in orthodontics. This article aims to review the literature and present the accuracy of different 3D printer types and any factors that could affect the 3D printing of dental models in the orthodontic field. The search strategy of this systematic review included keywords in combination with MeSH terms in Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane Library until June 2022 and only in English. Eleven articles were selected for our study. All the articles were in vitro prospective studies, and they presented a low risk of bias. The results suggested that the accuracy of a printed dental cast can be affected by the different types of 3D technologies, the dental cast's base design, and the printing materials. The accuracy appears to not be affected by the layer height and the position of the model on the building template. According to this systematic review, all different types of 3D technology can produce clinically accepted results for orthodontic purposes. There is a need for more studies to clarify the accuracy and added value of 3D printing technology in orthodontics.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Three-dimensional printing technology is an additive manufacturing technology that is used to reconstruct 3D objects. In the last decade, it has been rapidly involved in dentistry and in orthodontics. This article aims to review the literature and present the accuracy of different 3D printer types and any factors that could affect the 3D printing of dental models in the orthodontic field.
METHODS
METHODS
The search strategy of this systematic review included keywords in combination with MeSH terms in Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane Library until June 2022 and only in English.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Eleven articles were selected for our study. All the articles were in vitro prospective studies, and they presented a low risk of bias. The results suggested that the accuracy of a printed dental cast can be affected by the different types of 3D technologies, the dental cast's base design, and the printing materials. The accuracy appears to not be affected by the layer height and the position of the model on the building template.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
According to this systematic review, all different types of 3D technology can produce clinically accepted results for orthodontic purposes. There is a need for more studies to clarify the accuracy and added value of 3D printing technology in orthodontics.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35892609
pii: children9081106
doi: 10.3390/children9081106
pmc: PMC9330810
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
ID : 15243
Références
BDJ Open. 2022 May 26;8(1):14
pubmed: 35618716
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017 Jun;151(6):1178-1187
pubmed: 28554463
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022 Apr;161(4):582-591
pubmed: 35337648
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Feb;10(2):171-184
pubmed: 28183437
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020 Mar;157(3):422-428
pubmed: 32115120
Scanning. 2021 Jul 17;2021:9950131
pubmed: 34367410
Dent Clin North Am. 2021 Jul;65(3):623-641
pubmed: 34051933
J Vis Exp. 2014 Apr 29;(86):
pubmed: 24836007
Acta Biomater. 2021 Mar 1;122:26-49
pubmed: 33359299
J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Aug;118(2):208-215
pubmed: 28089333
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 16;17(24):
pubmed: 33339197
Angle Orthod. 2017 Sep;87(5):782-787
pubmed: 28459285
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Jan;26(1):303-312
pubmed: 34100158
Oper Dent. 2020 Jan/Feb;45(1):30-40
pubmed: 31172871
Br Dent J. 2015 Dec;219(11):521-9
pubmed: 26657435
J Prosthet Dent. 2018 May;119(5):861.e1-861.e7
pubmed: 29475753
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022 Jun;161(6):858-865
pubmed: 35636876
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021 Oct;160(4):594-602
pubmed: 34579820
J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Jul;118(1):36-42
pubmed: 28024822
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019 Aug;156(2):283-289
pubmed: 31375239
BMC Oral Health. 2017 Dec 12;17(1):149
pubmed: 29233132
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018 Jan;153(1):144-153
pubmed: 29287640
Biofabrication. 2017 Jun 07;9(2):024102
pubmed: 28589921
J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Feb;109(2):121-8
pubmed: 23395338
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015 Apr;28(4):398-403
pubmed: 25839152
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Jan;145(1):108-15
pubmed: 24373661
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018 Nov;154(5):733-739
pubmed: 30384944
Anal Chem. 2014 Apr 1;86(7):3240-53
pubmed: 24432804
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 27;19(3):
pubmed: 35162430
J Prosthodont. 2017 Feb;26(2):156-163
pubmed: 27662423