Cytotoxicity and Efficacy in Debris and Smear Layer Removal of HOCl-Based Irrigating Solution: An In Vitro Study.
Sterilox
cytotoxicity
debris
human gingival fibroblasts
irrigation
root canal
smear layer
super-oxidized water
Journal
Journal of functional biomaterials
ISSN: 2079-4983
Titre abrégé: J Funct Biomater
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101570734
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Jul 2022
15 Jul 2022
Historique:
received:
18
06
2022
revised:
12
07
2022
accepted:
14
07
2022
entrez:
27
7
2022
pubmed:
28
7
2022
medline:
28
7
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In the present study we evaluated the cytotoxicity of super-oxidized water on human gingival fibroblasts and its efficacy in debris and smear layer removal from root canal walls. Cultured gingival fibroblasts were exposed to super-oxidized water (Sterilox), which was diluted in Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium (IMDM) at 30%, 40%, 50%, 60% and 70% concentrations. The control group was maintained in IMDM. The cell viability was evaluated by means of an MTT assay after incubation periods of 1 h, 2 h, 24 h and 48 h. Pathological cellular changes were also observed under fluorescence and phase contrast microscopes. The efficacy in debris and smear layer removal was evaluated in comparison to the conventional application of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). Forty maxillary premolars were randomly divided into two equal groups (n = 20) and shaped with ProTaper NEXT rotary instruments using Sterilox or NaOCl/EDTA for irrigation. Afterwards, roots were split longitudinally and examined under a scanning electron microscope. The results revealed that super-oxidized water and sterile distilled water have acceptable biological properties for endodontic applications at concentrations up to 50% (p > 0.05). Moreover, super-oxidized water is equally effective in debris and smear layer removal as compared to NaOCl/EDTA (p > 0.05).
Identifiants
pubmed: 35893463
pii: jfb13030095
doi: 10.3390/jfb13030095
pmc: PMC9326542
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Aust Endod J. 2018 Dec;44(3):260-266
pubmed: 28940891
Int Endod J. 2016 Nov;49(11):1079-1087
pubmed: 26459183
J Endod. 2018 Feb;44(2):263-268
pubmed: 29229458
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 25;11(1):4666
pubmed: 33633128
J Endod. 2013 Mar;39(3 Suppl):S26-9
pubmed: 23439042
J Endod. 2017 Jul;43(7):1052-1057
pubmed: 28511779
Materials (Basel). 2020 Jan 02;13(1):
pubmed: 31906551
Aust Endod J. 2021 Dec 17;:
pubmed: 34919319
Wounds. 2014 Dec;26(12):342-50
pubmed: 25785777
J Endod. 2015 Jun;41(6):925-30
pubmed: 25791074
Microorganisms. 2021 Jan 08;9(1):
pubmed: 33435548
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Dec 20;10(12):
pubmed: 34943769
Cell Death Discov. 2015 Nov 09;1:15046
pubmed: 27551475
Int Endod J. 2013 Jul;46(7):599-618
pubmed: 23289914
J Endod. 2014 Jul;40(7):1005-8
pubmed: 24935553
Cell Cycle. 2013 Jun 1;12(11):1704-12
pubmed: 23656787
Braz Dent J. 2019 Jun;30(3):220-226
pubmed: 31166400
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Jan;25(1):237-245
pubmed: 32500405
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Mar;22(2):655-670
pubmed: 29372445
J Endod. 2015 Dec;41(12):1997-2001
pubmed: 26454720
Arch Microbiol. 2010 Sep;192(9):775-81
pubmed: 20652229
Int Endod J. 2011 Sep;44(9):792-9
pubmed: 21658076
J Clin Med. 2022 Feb 15;11(4):
pubmed: 35207275
J Endod. 2011 May;37(5):693-6
pubmed: 21496673
J Endod. 2017 Jan;43(1):16-24
pubmed: 27986099
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020 Feb;19(2):270-277
pubmed: 31904191
J Endod. 2021 Dec;47(12):1947-1952
pubmed: 34626612
J Endod. 2017 Sep;43(9):1545-1552
pubmed: 28734651
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Apr;10(4):ZC104-6
pubmed: 27190941
Materials (Basel). 2021 Oct 05;14(19):
pubmed: 34640224
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2021 Jan;10(1):13-23
pubmed: 32496980
Materials (Basel). 2020 Jan 07;13(2):
pubmed: 31936078
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012 Feb;1823(2):420-9
pubmed: 22008466
J Conserv Dent. 2021 Mar-Apr;24(2):153-157
pubmed: 34759581