Photon-Counting Detector CT Virtual Monoengergetic Images for Cochlear Implant Visualization-A Head to Head Comparison to Energy-Integrating Detector CT.
cadaver study
cochlear implant
energy-integrating detector CT
high-resolution computed tomography
metal artifacts
photon-counting detector CT
spatial resolution
virtual monoenergetic imaging
Journal
Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)
ISSN: 2379-139X
Titre abrégé: Tomography
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101671170
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 06 2022
21 06 2022
Historique:
received:
12
04
2022
revised:
07
06
2022
accepted:
18
06
2022
entrez:
27
7
2022
pubmed:
28
7
2022
medline:
29
7
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Cochlear implants (CIs) are the primary treatment method in patients with profound sensorineural hearing loss. Interpretation of postoperative imaging with conventional energy-integrating detector computed tomography (EID-CT) following CI surgery remains challenging due to metal artifacts. Still, the photon-counting detector (PCD-CT) is a new emerging technology with the potential to eliminate these problems. This study evaluated the performance of virtual monoenergetic (VME) EID-CT images versus PCD-CT in CI imaging. In this cadaveric study, two temporal bone specimens with implanted CIs were scanned with EID-CT and PCD-CT. The images were assessed according to the visibility of interelectrode wire, size of electrode contact, and diameter of halo artifacts. The visibility of interelectrode wire sections was significantly higher when reviewing PCD-CT images. The difference in diameter measurements for electrode contacts between the two CT scanner modalities showed that the PCD-CT technology generally led to significantly larger diameter readings. The larger measurements were closer to the manufacturer's specifications for the CI electrode. The size of halo artifacts surrounding the electrode contacts did not differ significantly between the two imaging modalities. PCT-CT imaging is a promising technology for CI imaging with improved spatial resolution and better visibility of small structures than conventional EID-CT.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35894001
pii: tomography8040136
doi: 10.3390/tomography8040136
pmc: PMC9326530
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1642-1648Références
Eur Radiol. 2022 May;32(5):2930-2936
pubmed: 34936011
Cochlear Implants Int. 2020 Jul;21(4):206-219
pubmed: 32079506
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 Sep;39(9):1733-1738
pubmed: 30093479
Radiology. 2001 Nov;221(2):543-9
pubmed: 11687702
J Belg Soc Radiol. 2020 Jul 03;104(1):37
pubmed: 32676547
IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci. 2021 Jul;5(4):441-452
pubmed: 34485784
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2016 Oct;3(4):043504
pubmed: 28042589
Radiology. 2022 Apr;303(1):130-138
pubmed: 34904876
Invest Radiol. 2019 Apr;54(4):204-211
pubmed: 30562270
In Vivo. 2021 Nov-Dec;35(6):3339-3344
pubmed: 34697167
Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 3;10(1):21099
pubmed: 33273590
Eur J Radiol. 2022 Jun;151:110283
pubmed: 35390602
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 2;17(3):e0264449
pubmed: 35235600
Otol Neurotol. 2009 Apr;30(3):299-303
pubmed: 19174709
Am J Otol. 2000 Jan;21(1):49-56
pubmed: 10651435
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 20;17(1):e0262758
pubmed: 35051221
Otol Neurotol. 2019 Jun;40(5):617-624
pubmed: 31083083
Asian J Neurosurg. 2018 Oct-Dec;13(4):1066-1070
pubmed: 30459869
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2009 Oct;266(10):1527-31
pubmed: 19308437
Radiology. 2019 Nov;293(2):260-271
pubmed: 31502938
PLoS One. 2020 May 5;15(5):e0232421
pubmed: 32369519
Phys Med Biol. 2016 Feb 21;61(4):1572-95
pubmed: 26835839
Invest Radiol. 2020 Feb;55(2):91-100
pubmed: 31770297
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 May 1;146(5):414-420
pubmed: 32134441
Radiographics. 2019 May-Jun;39(3):729-743
pubmed: 31059394