Safety of Otological Operating During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A National Prospective Audit of 1130 Cases from 79 Centers.


Journal

The journal of international advanced otology
ISSN: 2148-3817
Titre abrégé: J Int Adv Otol
Pays: Turkey
ID NLM: 101522982

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 2022
Historique:
entrez: 27 7 2022
pubmed: 28 7 2022
medline: 29 7 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To assess compliance with guidance produced by the UK body representing all ENT Surgeons (ENT UK) and the British Society of Otology (BSO) on restarting otological surgery after the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Safety was assessed by recording surgical complica- tions and transmission of SARS-CoV-2 transmission during this period. A prospective multicenter audit of otological surgery was conducted over a 12-week period, from June 15, 2020, to September 6, 2020. One thousand one hundred thirty cases from 79 hospital sites across Great Britain were involved in the study; 91.1% were tested for SARS-CoV-2 pre-operatively, none of whom tested positive; 70.4% were isolated for 7-14 days prior to surgery; 28.2% of surgeons wore full personal protective equipment, compared with 66.6% of anesthetists and 68.2% of scrub staff. The endoscope was used in 75 (6.7%) of all proce- dures, operations were changed to be performed under local rather than a general anesthetic in 3 cases (0.3%) and the "double drape" to protect against aerosol was used in 321 (27.4%) of cases. Trainees were present in 80.3% of cases. Complications occurred in 4% of cases. No patients or staff contracted SARS-CoV-2 during the audit. ENT UK and BSO guidance was variably followed, with the highest compliance for the use of an FFP3 mask, a negative SARS-CoV-2 swab, and trainee presence in theater. Surgeons did not use full personal protective equipment as frequently as their anesthetic and scrub team colleagues. There were only minimal changes in surgical and anesthetic techniques. Otological operation after the first wave of the SARS- CoV-2 pandemic was performed safely with no reported COVID transmission or increase in major complications despite changes in operating practice.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
To assess compliance with guidance produced by the UK body representing all ENT Surgeons (ENT UK) and the British Society of Otology (BSO) on restarting otological surgery after the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Safety was assessed by recording surgical complica- tions and transmission of SARS-CoV-2 transmission during this period.
METHODS
A prospective multicenter audit of otological surgery was conducted over a 12-week period, from June 15, 2020, to September 6, 2020.
RESULTS
One thousand one hundred thirty cases from 79 hospital sites across Great Britain were involved in the study; 91.1% were tested for SARS-CoV-2 pre-operatively, none of whom tested positive; 70.4% were isolated for 7-14 days prior to surgery; 28.2% of surgeons wore full personal protective equipment, compared with 66.6% of anesthetists and 68.2% of scrub staff. The endoscope was used in 75 (6.7%) of all proce- dures, operations were changed to be performed under local rather than a general anesthetic in 3 cases (0.3%) and the "double drape" to protect against aerosol was used in 321 (27.4%) of cases. Trainees were present in 80.3% of cases. Complications occurred in 4% of cases. No patients or staff contracted SARS-CoV-2 during the audit.
CONCLUSION
ENT UK and BSO guidance was variably followed, with the highest compliance for the use of an FFP3 mask, a negative SARS-CoV-2 swab, and trainee presence in theater. Surgeons did not use full personal protective equipment as frequently as their anesthetic and scrub team colleagues. There were only minimal changes in surgical and anesthetic techniques. Otological operation after the first wave of the SARS- CoV-2 pandemic was performed safely with no reported COVID transmission or increase in major complications despite changes in operating practice.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35894532
doi: 10.5152/iao.2022.21482
pmc: PMC9714000
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

347-357

Références

J Med Virol. 2011 Nov;83(11):2008-17
pubmed: 21915878
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1995 Feb;20(1):89-94
pubmed: 7788943
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Oct 27;19(1):189
pubmed: 33109197
J Laryngol Otol. 2020 Aug;134(8):739-743
pubmed: 32718359
Otol Neurotol. 2020 Oct;41(9):1230-1239
pubmed: 32925848
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2016 Apr;36(2):127-34
pubmed: 27196077
Otol Neurotol. 2021 Sep 1;42(8):1275-1284
pubmed: 34398111
N Engl J Med. 1999 Jan 28;340(4):260-4
pubmed: 9920949

Auteurs

Elinor Warner (E)

The Royal London Hospital, London, UK.

Reshma Ghedia (R)

The Royal London Hospital, London, UK.

Anton Alatsationos (A)

Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK.

Simon Lloyd (S)

Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK.

Peter Rea (P)

Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK.

Felicity Kay Kay Seymour (FK)

The Royal London Hospital, London, UK.

Bso And Bso Juniors (BAB)

Collaborators listed at the end of the manuscript.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH