Pneumatic spray delivery-based solid set canopy delivery system for oblique banded leaf roller and codling moth control in a high-density modern apple orchard.
biological efficacy
fixed spray delivery
fruit bioassay
larval mortality
leaf bioassay
pneumatic spray delivery
Journal
Pest management science
ISSN: 1526-4998
Titre abrégé: Pest Manag Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100898744
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2022
Nov 2022
Historique:
revised:
23
07
2022
received:
16
06
2022
accepted:
27
07
2022
pubmed:
28
7
2022
medline:
5
10
2022
entrez:
27
7
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Pneumatic spray delivery (PSD)-based solid set canopy delivery systems (SSCDS) have demonstrated comparable spray deposition and reduced off-target drift compared with axial-fan airblast sprayers in high-density apple orchards. An important next step is to quantify whether PSD-based SSCDS can provide effective pest management. This study evaluated the biological efficacy of this fixed spray system variant and compared it with that of an axial-fan airblast sprayer. Partial field trials were conducted in a commercial apple orchard (cv. Jazz) trained in tall spindle architecture. Insecticides were applied at a rate of 935 L ha OBLR mortality for SSCDS, airblast sprayer and untreated control treatments after 24 h of larval exposure was 91%, 98% and 4%, respectively and increased to 98%, 100% and 19% after 48 h. First-instar CM leaf bioassay mortality was 100% for SSCDS and airblast sprayer treatment, and 13% for the untreated control at 24 h post exposure. Larval CM mortality on fruit was 100% for SSCDS and airblast sprayer treatments, and 33% on the untreated control. Insecticides applied using SSCDS and an airblast sprayer had comparable larval mortality in all three assays, significantly higher than the untreated controls. These results suggest that PSD-based SSCDS may provide a viable alternative to axial-fan airblast sprayers in high-density apple orchards. © 2022 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Pneumatic spray delivery (PSD)-based solid set canopy delivery systems (SSCDS) have demonstrated comparable spray deposition and reduced off-target drift compared with axial-fan airblast sprayers in high-density apple orchards. An important next step is to quantify whether PSD-based SSCDS can provide effective pest management. This study evaluated the biological efficacy of this fixed spray system variant and compared it with that of an axial-fan airblast sprayer. Partial field trials were conducted in a commercial apple orchard (cv. Jazz) trained in tall spindle architecture. Insecticides were applied at a rate of 935 L ha
RESULTS
RESULTS
OBLR mortality for SSCDS, airblast sprayer and untreated control treatments after 24 h of larval exposure was 91%, 98% and 4%, respectively and increased to 98%, 100% and 19% after 48 h. First-instar CM leaf bioassay mortality was 100% for SSCDS and airblast sprayer treatment, and 13% for the untreated control at 24 h post exposure. Larval CM mortality on fruit was 100% for SSCDS and airblast sprayer treatments, and 33% on the untreated control.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Insecticides applied using SSCDS and an airblast sprayer had comparable larval mortality in all three assays, significantly higher than the untreated controls. These results suggest that PSD-based SSCDS may provide a viable alternative to axial-fan airblast sprayers in high-density apple orchards. © 2022 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35895013
doi: 10.1002/ps.7099
pmc: PMC9805226
doi:
Substances chimiques
Insecticides
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
4793-4801Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.
Références
Insects. 2019 Jun 29;10(7):
pubmed: 31261916
J Insect Sci. 2006;6:1-7
pubmed: 19537964
Pest Manag Sci. 2022 Nov;78(11):4793-4801
pubmed: 35895013
J Insect Sci. 2005;5:14
pubmed: 16341246
J Insect Sci. 2011;11:161
pubmed: 22239247
Pest Manag Sci. 2019 Nov;75(11):3050-3059
pubmed: 30895726
J Insect Sci. 2008;8:14
pubmed: 20337564