Co-designing Improved Communication of Newborn Bloodspot Screening Results to Parents: Mixed Methods Study.
experience-based co-design
health communication
neonatal screening
participatory research
Journal
Journal of participatory medicine
ISSN: 2152-7202
Titre abrégé: J Particip Med
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101539422
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Jul 2022
27 Jul 2022
Historique:
received:
22
09
2021
accepted:
19
04
2022
revised:
23
03
2022
entrez:
27
7
2022
pubmed:
28
7
2022
medline:
28
7
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Each year in England, almost 10,000 parents are informed of their child's positive newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) results. This occurs approximately 2 to 8 weeks after birth depending on the condition. Communication of positive NBS results is a subtle and skillful task, demanding thought, preparation, and evidence to minimize potentially harmful negative sequelae. Evidence of variability in the content and the way the result is currently communicated has the potential to lead to increased parental anxiety and distress. This study focused on the development of co-designed interventions to improve the experiences of parents receiving positive NBS results for their children and enhance communication between health care professionals and parents. An experience-based co-design approach was used to explore experiences and co-design solutions with 17 health professionals employed in 3 National Health Service Trusts in England and 21 parents (13/21, 62% mothers and 8/21, 38% fathers) of 14 children recruited from the same 3 National Health Service Trusts. Experiences with existing services were gathered via semistructured interviews with health professionals. Filmed narrative interviews with parents were developed into a composite film. The co-design process identified priorities for improving communication of positive NBS results through separate parent and health professional feedback events followed by joint feedback events. In total, 4 interventions were then co-designed between the participants through a web-based platform. Parents and health professionals provided positive feedback regarding the process of gathering experiences and identifying priorities. Themes identified from the parent interviews included impact of initial communication, parental reactions, attending the first clinic appointment, impact of health professionals' communication strategies and skills, impact of diagnosis on family and friends, improvements to the communication of positive NBS results, and parents' views on NBS. Themes identified from the health professional interviews included communication between health professionals, process of communicating with the family, parent- and family-centered care, and availability of resources and challenges to effective communication. In response to these themes, 4 interventions were co-designed: changes to the NBS card; standardized laboratory proformas; standardized communication checklists; and an email or letter for providing reliable, up-to-date, condition-specific information for parents following the communication of positive NBS results. Parents and health professionals were able to successfully work together to identify priorities and develop co-designed interventions to improve communication of positive NBS results to parents. The resulting co-designed interventions address communication at different stages of the communication pathway to improve the experiences of parents receiving positive NBS results for their children. RR2-10.1186/s40814-019-0487-5.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Each year in England, almost 10,000 parents are informed of their child's positive newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) results. This occurs approximately 2 to 8 weeks after birth depending on the condition. Communication of positive NBS results is a subtle and skillful task, demanding thought, preparation, and evidence to minimize potentially harmful negative sequelae. Evidence of variability in the content and the way the result is currently communicated has the potential to lead to increased parental anxiety and distress.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
This study focused on the development of co-designed interventions to improve the experiences of parents receiving positive NBS results for their children and enhance communication between health care professionals and parents.
METHODS
METHODS
An experience-based co-design approach was used to explore experiences and co-design solutions with 17 health professionals employed in 3 National Health Service Trusts in England and 21 parents (13/21, 62% mothers and 8/21, 38% fathers) of 14 children recruited from the same 3 National Health Service Trusts. Experiences with existing services were gathered via semistructured interviews with health professionals. Filmed narrative interviews with parents were developed into a composite film. The co-design process identified priorities for improving communication of positive NBS results through separate parent and health professional feedback events followed by joint feedback events. In total, 4 interventions were then co-designed between the participants through a web-based platform.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Parents and health professionals provided positive feedback regarding the process of gathering experiences and identifying priorities. Themes identified from the parent interviews included impact of initial communication, parental reactions, attending the first clinic appointment, impact of health professionals' communication strategies and skills, impact of diagnosis on family and friends, improvements to the communication of positive NBS results, and parents' views on NBS. Themes identified from the health professional interviews included communication between health professionals, process of communicating with the family, parent- and family-centered care, and availability of resources and challenges to effective communication. In response to these themes, 4 interventions were co-designed: changes to the NBS card; standardized laboratory proformas; standardized communication checklists; and an email or letter for providing reliable, up-to-date, condition-specific information for parents following the communication of positive NBS results.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Parents and health professionals were able to successfully work together to identify priorities and develop co-designed interventions to improve communication of positive NBS results to parents. The resulting co-designed interventions address communication at different stages of the communication pathway to improve the experiences of parents receiving positive NBS results for their children.
INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)
UNASSIGNED
RR2-10.1186/s40814-019-0487-5.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35896023
pii: v14i1e33485
doi: 10.2196/33485
pmc: PMC9377474
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e33485Informations de copyright
©Jane Chudleigh, Lynette Shakespeare, Pru Holder, Holly Chinnery, Gemma Hack, Tanya Gill, Rachel Gould, Kevin W Southern, Ellinor K Olander, Stephen Morris, James R Bonham, Alan Simpson, Louise Moody. Originally published in Journal of Participatory Medicine (https://jopm.jmir.org), 27.07.2022.
Références
J Genet Couns. 2016 Dec;25(6):1215-1226
pubmed: 27098418
Fam Process. 2005 Mar;44(1):3-24
pubmed: 15807075
Genet Med. 2011 Jul;13(7):658-61
pubmed: 21546841
Eur J Hum Genet. 2015 Apr;23(4):459-65
pubmed: 25005733
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Dec 13;7:203
pubmed: 18078504
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Dec 13;21(1):269
pubmed: 33308161
BMJ. 2020 Oct 20;371:m3945
pubmed: 33082127
Support Care Cancer. 2015 Oct;23(10):3069-80
pubmed: 25744288
BMJ. 2015 Feb 10;350:g7714
pubmed: 25670179
Int J Neonatal Screen. 2021 Jul 07;7(3):
pubmed: 34287223
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Aug 29;69(686):e586-e594
pubmed: 31160368
J Child Health Care. 2012 Dec;16(4):367-81
pubmed: 22984167
Health Technol Assess. 2009 Nov;13(57):1-82, iii
pubmed: 19948087
J Cyst Fibros. 2016 Jul;15(4):443-51
pubmed: 26751132
J Child Health Care. 2018 Sep;22(3):382-392
pubmed: 29486591
J Cyst Fibros. 2019 Sep;18(5):614-621
pubmed: 31047829
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 1;10(10):e037081
pubmed: 33004391
J Patient Exp. 2020 Dec;7(6):1181-1188
pubmed: 33457563
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2012 Aug;51(8):739-44
pubmed: 22563060
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 12;10(12):e044755
pubmed: 33310815
Genet Med. 2020 Mar;22(3):566-573
pubmed: 31597957
Qual Health Res. 2011 Feb;21(2):174-86
pubmed: 20852016
J Pediatr Nurs. 2010 Oct;25(5):335-43
pubmed: 20816555
Front Sociol. 2019 May 08;4:38
pubmed: 33869361
Eur J Pediatr. 2019 Jun;178(6):803-809
pubmed: 30852643
Burns. 2019 Dec;45(8):1848-1855
pubmed: 31395461
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2014 Oct;19(4):200-7
pubmed: 24840387
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Oct;102(10):1756-1766
pubmed: 31227333
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2019 Sep 04;5:108
pubmed: 31508239
Pediatrics. 2005 Jun;115(6):1692-703
pubmed: 15930234
Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2017 Jun 25;15(3):e55451
pubmed: 29201074
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Mar;90(3):378-85
pubmed: 22240007
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2015 Jan;36(1):24-34
pubmed: 25493463
J Pediatr. 2020 Sep;224:37-43.e2
pubmed: 32386871
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 27;11(8):e050773
pubmed: 34452966
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2021 Jun;30(3):703-714
pubmed: 33459482
Support Care Cancer. 2012 Nov;20(11):2639-47
pubmed: 22544223
BMJ Open. 2021 May 13;11(5):e047114
pubmed: 33986066