Evaluating the Effect of a COVID-19 Predictive Model to Facilitate Discharge: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Journal
Applied clinical informatics
ISSN: 1869-0327
Titre abrégé: Appl Clin Inform
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101537732
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2022
05 2022
Historique:
entrez:
27
7
2022
pubmed:
28
7
2022
medline:
30
7
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We previously developed and validated a predictive model to help clinicians identify hospitalized adults with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who may be ready for discharge given their low risk of adverse events. Whether this algorithm can prompt more timely discharge for stable patients in practice is unknown. The aim of the study is to estimate the effect of displaying risk scores on length of stay (LOS). We integrated model output into the electronic health record (EHR) at four hospitals in one health system by displaying a green/orange/red score indicating low/moderate/high-risk in a patient list column and a larger COVID-19 summary report visible for each patient. Display of the score was pseudo-randomized 1:1 into intervention and control arms using a patient identifier passed to the model execution code. Intervention effect was assessed by comparing LOS between intervention and control groups. Adverse safety outcomes of death, hospice, and re-presentation were tested separately and as a composite indicator. We tracked adoption and sustained use through daily counts of score displays. Enrolling 1,010 patients from May 15, 2020 to December 7, 2020, the trial found no detectable difference in LOS. The intervention had no impact on safety indicators of death, hospice or re-presentation after discharge. The scores were displayed consistently throughout the study period but the study lacks a causally linked process measure of provider actions based on the score. Secondary analysis revealed complex dynamics in LOS temporally, by primary symptom, and hospital location. An AI-based COVID-19 risk score displayed passively to clinicians during routine care of hospitalized adults with COVID-19 was safe but had no detectable impact on LOS. Health technology challenges such as insufficient adoption, nonuniform use, and provider trust compounded with temporal factors of the COVID-19 pandemic may have contributed to the null result. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04570488.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
We previously developed and validated a predictive model to help clinicians identify hospitalized adults with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who may be ready for discharge given their low risk of adverse events. Whether this algorithm can prompt more timely discharge for stable patients in practice is unknown.
OBJECTIVES
The aim of the study is to estimate the effect of displaying risk scores on length of stay (LOS).
METHODS
We integrated model output into the electronic health record (EHR) at four hospitals in one health system by displaying a green/orange/red score indicating low/moderate/high-risk in a patient list column and a larger COVID-19 summary report visible for each patient. Display of the score was pseudo-randomized 1:1 into intervention and control arms using a patient identifier passed to the model execution code. Intervention effect was assessed by comparing LOS between intervention and control groups. Adverse safety outcomes of death, hospice, and re-presentation were tested separately and as a composite indicator. We tracked adoption and sustained use through daily counts of score displays.
RESULTS
Enrolling 1,010 patients from May 15, 2020 to December 7, 2020, the trial found no detectable difference in LOS. The intervention had no impact on safety indicators of death, hospice or re-presentation after discharge. The scores were displayed consistently throughout the study period but the study lacks a causally linked process measure of provider actions based on the score. Secondary analysis revealed complex dynamics in LOS temporally, by primary symptom, and hospital location.
CONCLUSION
An AI-based COVID-19 risk score displayed passively to clinicians during routine care of hospitalized adults with COVID-19 was safe but had no detectable impact on LOS. Health technology challenges such as insufficient adoption, nonuniform use, and provider trust compounded with temporal factors of the COVID-19 pandemic may have contributed to the null result.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04570488.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35896506
doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1750416
pmc: PMC9329139
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04570488']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
632-640Subventions
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : P30 AG066512
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR001445
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
None declared.
Références
N Engl J Med. 2019 Sep 19;381(12):1175-1179
pubmed: 31532967
Arch Surg. 2007 May;142(5):461-5; discussion 465-6
pubmed: 17515488
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2021 Sep;28(1):
pubmed: 34479962
SN Compr Clin Med. 2020;2(8):1069-1076
pubmed: 32838147
BMJ. 2020 Apr 7;369:m1328
pubmed: 32265220
J Chronic Dis. 1957 Aug;6(2):141-52
pubmed: 13449139
Eur Respir J. 2020 May 14;55(5):
pubmed: 32217650
Nat Med. 2019 Sep;25(9):1337-1340
pubmed: 31427808
Mayo Clin Proc. 2021 Feb;96(2):446-463
pubmed: 33549263
Am J Crit Care. 2015 Nov;24(6):466-73
pubmed: 26523003
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 30;382(18):1708-1720
pubmed: 32109013
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Jun 2;172(11 Suppl):S73-S78
pubmed: 32479174
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Aug 1;180(8):1081-1089
pubmed: 32396163
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Oct 6;3:130
pubmed: 33083565
BMJ. 2017 Mar 6;356:i6795
pubmed: 28264797
Infection. 2020 Aug;48(4):577-584
pubmed: 32440918
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2015 Feb;144(1):114-26
pubmed: 25401381
JAMA. 1996 Aug 28;276(8):637-9
pubmed: 8773637
Eur Respir J. 2020 Jul 16;56(1):
pubmed: 32430433
Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):497-506
pubmed: 31986264
J Infect. 2020 Aug;81(2):282-288
pubmed: 32479771
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008 Sep-Oct;15(5):575-80
pubmed: 18579839
EBioMedicine. 2020 May;55:102763
pubmed: 32361250
Ann Intern Med. 2021 Jan;174(1):33-41
pubmed: 32960645
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021 Jul;18(7):1129-1137
pubmed: 33357088
Chest. 2020 Jul;158(1):97-105
pubmed: 32304772