A nationwide study of patients operated for cervical degenerative disorders in public and private hospitals.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 07 2022
27 07 2022
Historique:
received:
28
09
2021
accepted:
21
07
2022
entrez:
27
7
2022
pubmed:
28
7
2022
medline:
30
7
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
During the last decades, there has been an increase in the rate of surgery for degenerative disorders of the cervical spine and in the use of supplementary private health insurance. Still, there is limited knowledge about the differences in characteristics of patients operated in public and private hospitals. Therefore, we aimed at comparing sociodemographic-, clinical- and patient management data on patients operated for degenerative cervical radiculopathy and degenerative cervical myelopathy in public and private hospitals in Norway. This was a cross-sectional study on patients in the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery operated for degenerative cervical radiculopathy and degenerative cervical myelopathy between January 2012 and December 2020. At admission for surgery, we assessed disability by the following patient reported outcome measures (PROMs): neck disability index (NDI), EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) and numerical rating scales for neck pain (NRS-NP) and arm pain (NRS-AP). Among 9161 patients, 7344 (80.2%) procedures were performed in public hospitals and 1817 (19.8%) in private hospitals. Mean age was 52.1 years in public hospitals and 49.7 years in private hospitals (P < 0.001). More women were operated in public hospitals (47.9%) than in private hospitals (31.6%) (P < 0.001). A larger proportion of patients in private hospitals had high education (≥ 4 years of college or university) (42.9% vs 35.6%, P < 0.001). Patients in public hospitals had worse disease-specific health problems than those in private hospitals: unadjusted NDI mean difference was 5.2 (95% CI 4.4 - 6.0; P < 0.001) and adjusted NDI mean difference was 3.4 (95% CI 2.5 - 4.2; P < 0.001), and they also had longer duration of symptoms (P < 0.001). Duration of surgery (mean difference 29 minutes, 95% CI 27.1 - 30.7; P < 0.001) and length of hospital stay (mean difference 2 days, 95% CI 2.3 - 2.4; P < 0.001) were longer in public hospitals. In conclusion, patients operated for degenerative cervical spine in private hospitals were healthier, younger, better educated and more often men. They also had less and shorter duration of symptoms and seemed to be managed more efficiently. Our findings indicate that access to cervical spine surgery in private hospitals could be skewed in favour of patients with higher socioeconomic status.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35896806
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17194-z
pii: 10.1038/s41598-022-17194-z
pmc: PMC9329342
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
12856Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Health Econ Policy Law. 2018 Jan;13(1):50-67
pubmed: 28382886
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Feb 27;18(1):141
pubmed: 29482564
Global Spine J. 2017 Sep;7(3 Suppl):70S-83S
pubmed: 29164035
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009 May;39(5):400-17
pubmed: 19521015
Ann Med. 2001 Jul;33(5):337-43
pubmed: 11491192
Neurosurgery. 2016 Aug;63 Suppl 1:96-101
pubmed: 27399373
Spine J. 2010 Jun;10(6):469-74
pubmed: 20359958
Eur Spine J. 2014 Sep;23(9):1984-91
pubmed: 24898309
BMJ. 2002 Oct 26;325(7370):961-4
pubmed: 12399352
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jul 9;383(2):159-168
pubmed: 32640134
Med Care. 1997 Nov;35(11):1095-108
pubmed: 9366889
Neurosurgery. 2021 Sep 15;89(4):704-711
pubmed: 34325471
World Neurosurg. 2014 Jul-Aug;82(1-2):e345-52
pubmed: 24145235
J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Sep;66(9):1022-8
pubmed: 23790725
Lancet. 2015 Aug 22;386(9995):743-800
pubmed: 26063472
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Jun 15;38(14):1226-32
pubmed: 23403550
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002 Apr;56(4):253-8
pubmed: 11896131
Neurosurgery. 2020 May 1;86(5):736-741
pubmed: 31268151
World Neurosurg. 2015 Nov;84(5):1227-34
pubmed: 26100169
Spine J. 2016 Nov;16(11):1413-1422
pubmed: 27497886
Lancet. 2007 Oct 20;370(9596):1453-7
pubmed: 18064739
J Clin Nurs. 2005 Aug;14(7):798-804
pubmed: 16000093
N Engl J Med. 2008 Jun 5;358(23):2468-81
pubmed: 18525043
Eur Spine J. 2008 Mar;17(3):406-414
pubmed: 18084782
Eur J Epidemiol. 2014 Aug;29(8):551-8
pubmed: 24407880
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Jul 15;11:170
pubmed: 21762518
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2019 Oct;161(10):2147-2159
pubmed: 31154519
Neurosurgery. 2020 Jan 1;86(1):30-45
pubmed: 30690479
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008 Sep;31(7):491-502
pubmed: 18803999
Global Spine J. 2021 Apr;11(3):299-304
pubmed: 32875861
Lancet. 1997 Jun 7;349(9066):1655-9
pubmed: 9186383
Health Syst Transit. 2013;15(8):1-162
pubmed: 24434287
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2016 May;158(5):969-74
pubmed: 26983821
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Jan;41(1):74-81
pubmed: 26335678
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015 Apr;36(4):811-6
pubmed: 25430861