Multi-GNSS-Weighted Interpolated Tropospheric Delay to Improve Long-Baseline RTK Positioning.

double-difference interpolation real-time kinematic tropospheric slant delay tropospheric zenith delay weighted least-squares

Journal

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1424-8220
Titre abrégé: Sensors (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101204366

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
26 Jul 2022
Historique:
received: 17 06 2022
revised: 19 07 2022
accepted: 21 07 2022
entrez: 28 7 2022
pubmed: 29 7 2022
medline: 29 7 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Until now, RTK (real-time kinematic) and NRTK (Network-based RTK) have been the most popular cm-level accurate positioning approaches based on Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) signals in real-time. The tropospheric delay is a major source of RTK errors, especially for medium and long baselines. This source of error is difficult to quantify due to its reliance on highly variable atmospheric humidity. In this paper, we use the NRTK approach to estimate double-differenced zenith tropospheric delays alongside ambiguities and positions based on a complete set of multi-GNSS data in a sample 6-station network in Europe. The ZTD files published by IGS were used to validate the estimated ZTDs. The results confirmed a good agreement, with an average Root Mean Squares Error (RMSE) of about 12 mm. Although multiplying the unknowns makes the mathematical model less reliable in correctly fixing integer ambiguities, adding a priori interpolated ZTD as quasi-observations can improve positioning accuracy and Integer Ambiguity Resolution (IAR) performance. In this work, weighted least-squares (WLS) were performed using the interpolation of ZTD values of near reference stations of the IGS network. When using a well-known Kriging interpolation, the weights depend on the semivariogram, and a higher network density is required to obtain the correct covariance function. Hence, we used a simple interpolation strategy, which minimized the impact of altitude variability within the network. Compared to standard RTK where ZTD is assumed to be unknown, this technique improves the positioning accuracy by about 50%. It also increased the success rate for IAR by nearly 1.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35898071
pii: s22155570
doi: 10.3390/s22155570
pmc: PMC9331772
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Références

Geophys Res Lett. 2013 Mar 28;40(6):1069-1073
pubmed: 25821263
Sensors (Basel). 2018 Apr 14;18(4):
pubmed: 29661999
J Geod. 2018;92(4):349-360
pubmed: 31258259

Auteurs

Farinaz Mirmohammadian (F)

Department of Geomatics Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Transportation, University of Isfahan, Isfahan 8174673441, Iran.
Department of Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Delft University of Technology, 2600 AA Delft, The Netherlands.

Jamal Asgari (J)

Department of Geomatics Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Transportation, University of Isfahan, Isfahan 8174673441, Iran.

Sandra Verhagen (S)

Department of Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Delft University of Technology, 2600 AA Delft, The Netherlands.

Alireza Amiri-Simkooei (A)

Department of Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Delft University of Technology, 2600 AA Delft, The Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH