Development and validation of predictive risk models for sight threatening diabetic retinopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes to be applied as triage tools in resource limited settings.
BMI, Body mass index
CCG, Clinical Commissioning Group
CI, Confidence Interval
CPRD, Clinical Practice Research Datalink
CVD, Cardiovascular disease
DR, Diabetic Retinopathy
Diabetes
Diabetic
GP, General Practice
HR, Hazard ratio
India
NHS, National Health Service
OR, Odds ratio
Performance
Predictive models
Retinopathy
STDR, Sight threatening diabetic retinopathy
South Asians
T2DM, Type II diabetes mellitus
UK, United Kingdom
Journal
EClinicalMedicine
ISSN: 2589-5370
Titre abrégé: EClinicalMedicine
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101733727
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2022
Sep 2022
Historique:
received:
09
11
2021
revised:
04
07
2022
accepted:
06
07
2022
entrez:
28
7
2022
pubmed:
29
7
2022
medline:
29
7
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Delayed diagnosis and treatment of sight threatening diabetic retinopathy (STDR) is a common cause of visual impairment in people with Type 2 diabetes. Therefore, systematic regular retinal screening is recommended, but global coverage of such services is challenging. We aimed to develop and validate predictive models for STDR to identify 'at-risk' population for retinal screening. Models were developed using datasets obtained from general practices in inner London, United Kingdom (UK) on adults with type 2 Diabetes during the period 2007-2017. Three models were developed using Cox regression and model performance was assessed using C statistic, calibration slope and observed to expected ratio measures. Models were externally validated in cohorts from Wales, UK and India. A total of 40,334 people were included in the model development phase of which 1427 (3·54%) people developed STDR. Age, gender, diabetes duration, antidiabetic medication history, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), and history of retinopathy were included as predictors in the Model 1, Model 2 excluded retinopathy status, and Model 3 further excluded HbA1c. All three models attained strong discrimination performance in the model development dataset with C statistics ranging from 0·778 to 0·832, and in the external validation datasets (C statistic 0·685 - 0·823) with calibration slopes closer to 1 following re-calibration of the baseline survival. We have developed new risk prediction equations to identify those at risk of STDR in people with type 2 diabetes in any resource-setting so that they can be screened and treated early. Future testing, and piloting is required before implementation. This study was funded by the GCRF UKRI (MR/P207881/1) and supported by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Delayed diagnosis and treatment of sight threatening diabetic retinopathy (STDR) is a common cause of visual impairment in people with Type 2 diabetes. Therefore, systematic regular retinal screening is recommended, but global coverage of such services is challenging. We aimed to develop and validate predictive models for STDR to identify 'at-risk' population for retinal screening.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
Models were developed using datasets obtained from general practices in inner London, United Kingdom (UK) on adults with type 2 Diabetes during the period 2007-2017. Three models were developed using Cox regression and model performance was assessed using C statistic, calibration slope and observed to expected ratio measures. Models were externally validated in cohorts from Wales, UK and India.
Findings
UNASSIGNED
A total of 40,334 people were included in the model development phase of which 1427 (3·54%) people developed STDR. Age, gender, diabetes duration, antidiabetic medication history, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), and history of retinopathy were included as predictors in the Model 1, Model 2 excluded retinopathy status, and Model 3 further excluded HbA1c. All three models attained strong discrimination performance in the model development dataset with C statistics ranging from 0·778 to 0·832, and in the external validation datasets (C statistic 0·685 - 0·823) with calibration slopes closer to 1 following re-calibration of the baseline survival.
Interpretation
UNASSIGNED
We have developed new risk prediction equations to identify those at risk of STDR in people with type 2 diabetes in any resource-setting so that they can be screened and treated early. Future testing, and piloting is required before implementation.
Funding
UNASSIGNED
This study was funded by the GCRF UKRI (MR/P207881/1) and supported by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35898318
doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101578
pii: S2589-5370(22)00308-X
pmc: PMC9310126
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
101578Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/P027881/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Author(s).
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
SS reports personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Bayer, grants from Boehringer Ingleheim, grants and personal fees from Allergan, personal fees from Oxurion, personal fees from Apellis, personal fees from Roche, outside the submitted work; ATP reports grants from UKRI to employer King's College London, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Roche and a grant from Wellcome Trust, outside the submitted work. RM reports personal fees from AMGEN, outside the submitted work. None of the other authors declare that they have any competing interests related to the submitted work.
Références
Diabetologia. 2011 Oct;54(10):2525-32
pubmed: 21792613
Diabetes Care. 2013 Jun;36(6):1562-8
pubmed: 23275374
Eye (Lond). 2019 May;33(5):702-713
pubmed: 30651592
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2009 Jan 16;9:3
pubmed: 19149883
Acta Ophthalmol. 2012 Mar;90(2):109-14
pubmed: 20384605
Ann Intern Med. 2006 Aug 15;145(4):247-54
pubmed: 16908915
Biometrics. 1986 Dec;42(4):845-54
pubmed: 3814726
Pharmacoeconomics. 2015 Feb;33(2):149-61
pubmed: 25344660
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020 May;8(1):
pubmed: 32475840
Diabetologia. 2004 Oct;47(10):1747-59
pubmed: 15517152
Diabetes Care. 2013 May;36(5):1193-9
pubmed: 23404305
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Mar 06;13:33
pubmed: 23496923
BMJ. 2015 Nov 11;351:h5441
pubmed: 26560308
Diabetologia. 2020 Jun;63(6):1110-1119
pubmed: 32246157
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Mar;21(3):560-568
pubmed: 30284381
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018 Mar;12(2):295-302
pubmed: 28494618
J Diabetes Complications. 2015 May-Jun;29(4):479-87
pubmed: 25772254
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018 Apr;138:271-281
pubmed: 29496507
Biometrics. 1985 Dec;41(4):933-45
pubmed: 3830259
Diabetologia. 2017 Nov;60(11):2174-2182
pubmed: 28840258
J Diabetes Complications. 2011 Sep-Oct;25(5):292-7
pubmed: 21334925
Diabetes Care. 1983 Mar-Apr;6(2):144-8
pubmed: 6851807
Epidemiology. 2010 Jan;21(1):128-38
pubmed: 20010215
Diabetes Care. 2013 Mar;36(3):580-5
pubmed: 23150285
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017 Oct;5(10):788-798
pubmed: 28803840
Diabetologia. 2013 Sep;56(9):1925-33
pubmed: 23793713
J Stat Softw. 2010 Aug;36(2):
pubmed: 25285054
PLoS Med. 2019 Oct 17;16(10):e1002945
pubmed: 31622334
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Sep;19(74):1-116
pubmed: 26384314