The effects of minimum unit pricing for alcohol on food purchases: Evaluation of a natural experiment.
Journal
SSM - population health
ISSN: 2352-8273
Titre abrégé: SSM Popul Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101678841
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2022
Sep 2022
Historique:
received:
08
12
2021
revised:
13
07
2022
accepted:
13
07
2022
entrez:
28
7
2022
pubmed:
29
7
2022
medline:
29
7
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
On the 1st of May 2018 Scotland became the first country to introduce minimum unit pricing (MUP) for alcohol sales. The objective of this study is to identify the effects of this policy instrument on food purchasing by evaluating a natural experiment. Longitudinal analysis compares regions with similar characteristics but differing exposure to MUP (Scotland and the north of England). Secondary data from the Kantar Worldpanel on itemised purchases between April 2017 and April 2019 provided a total sample of 8051 households. The outcomes analysed are weekly household expenditure (£s) and purchase volume (grams), both overall and disaggregated to 16 product categories. Following the introduction of MUP, total household food expenditure in Scotland declined by 1.0%, 95%CI [-1.9%, -0.0%], and total food volume declined by 0.8%, 95%CI [-1.7%, 0.2%] compared to the north of England. There is variation in response between product categories, with less spending on fruit and vegetables and increased spending on crisps and snacks. Minimum unit pricing for alcohol has displaced some household food purchasing and the pattern of changes in food categories appears to be less desirable from a healthy diet perspective. However, changes caused by a minimum price at a nominal 50 pence per unit of alcohol are relatively small.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
On the 1st of May 2018 Scotland became the first country to introduce minimum unit pricing (MUP) for alcohol sales. The objective of this study is to identify the effects of this policy instrument on food purchasing by evaluating a natural experiment.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
Longitudinal analysis compares regions with similar characteristics but differing exposure to MUP (Scotland and the north of England). Secondary data from the Kantar Worldpanel on itemised purchases between April 2017 and April 2019 provided a total sample of 8051 households. The outcomes analysed are weekly household expenditure (£s) and purchase volume (grams), both overall and disaggregated to 16 product categories.
Results
UNASSIGNED
Following the introduction of MUP, total household food expenditure in Scotland declined by 1.0%, 95%CI [-1.9%, -0.0%], and total food volume declined by 0.8%, 95%CI [-1.7%, 0.2%] compared to the north of England. There is variation in response between product categories, with less spending on fruit and vegetables and increased spending on crisps and snacks.
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
Minimum unit pricing for alcohol has displaced some household food purchasing and the pattern of changes in food categories appears to be less desirable from a healthy diet perspective. However, changes caused by a minimum price at a nominal 50 pence per unit of alcohol are relatively small.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35898560
doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101174
pii: S2352-8273(22)00153-7
pmc: PMC9310105
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
101174Subventions
Organisme : Chief Scientist Office
ID : HERU1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Chief Scientist Office
ID : HIPS/19/01
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_00022/2
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
Health Econ. 2020 Dec;29(12):1637-1656
pubmed: 32929848
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 13;17(10):
pubmed: 32414068
J Public Health (Oxf). 2022 Jun 27;44(2):e192-e202
pubmed: 33837430
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jan 07;15:1
pubmed: 25563658
J Am Diet Assoc. 2010 Apr;110(4):551-62
pubmed: 20338281
BMJ. 2019 Sep 25;366:l5274
pubmed: 31554617
Am J Clin Nutr. 2013 May;97(5):1068-75
pubmed: 23535109
Nutrients. 2017 Aug 28;9(9):
pubmed: 28846642
Lancet Public Health. 2021 Aug;6(8):e557-e565
pubmed: 34058125
Nutrients. 2021 Aug 24;13(9):
pubmed: 34578805
Br J Nutr. 2019 Mar;121(5):481-495
pubmed: 30630543