Identifying child protection workers at risk for secondary traumatization: A latent class analysis of the Professional Quality of Life Scale-5.
Journal
Journal of traumatic stress
ISSN: 1573-6598
Titre abrégé: J Trauma Stress
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8809259
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2022
12 2022
Historique:
revised:
06
05
2022
received:
20
10
2021
accepted:
06
05
2022
pubmed:
29
7
2022
medline:
6
12
2022
entrez:
28
7
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Secondary traumatization (ST) is a topical area among trauma-exposed employees, where many are at risk of occupational mental health problems due to their work with trauma survivors. Challenges related to the accurate operationalization of ST symptoms persist, and there is no valid method for identifying employees at risk of clinically significant symptom levels. This study aimed to test the applicability of latent class analysis (LCA) to identify employees at risk for clinically relevant ST symptoms. LCA was used to identify patterns of ST symptom endorsement using the Professional Quality of Life Scale-5 (ProQoL) in a national sample of Danish child protection workers (CPW; N = 545). Predictors and associated levels of distress and functional impairment across the symptom presentations were tested using regression analysis, and three classes were identified. A total of 3.8% (n = 21) of participants were at high risk of endorsing symptoms of ST that were associated with significant levels of distress and increased functional impairment. The LCA approach outperformed existing scoring procedures in differentiating between employees with varying levels of distress, impairment, and well-being. A minority of Danish CPWs are at risk for levels of ST that may be considered clinically significant for their associations with anxiety and social and cognitive impairment. Although the ProQoL is not a diagnostic tool, per se, a revised scoring procedure may render the measure useful when screening for employees who are at risk for levels of distress and impairment that require intervention.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35899686
doi: 10.1002/jts.22863
pmc: PMC10087244
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1608-1619Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Traumatic Stress published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies.
Références
Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7
pubmed: 16717171
J Trauma Stress. 2015 Apr;28(2):83-91
pubmed: 25864503
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2019 Nov 20;10(1):1672948
pubmed: 31897268
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013 Jun;37(5):860-95
pubmed: 23567521
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2003;12(2):85-91
pubmed: 12830302
Clin Psychol Rev. 2011 Feb;31(1):25-36
pubmed: 21130934
J Occup Health Psychol. 1996 Jan;1(1):27-41
pubmed: 9547031
J Trauma Stress. 2022 Dec;35(6):1608-1619
pubmed: 35899686
Am J Epidemiol. 2014 Feb 15;179(4):423-31
pubmed: 24272278
Child Abuse Negl. 2017 Aug;70:100-111
pubmed: 28609690
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 26;9:2273
pubmed: 30542305
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2018 Dec;138(6):536-546
pubmed: 30178492
Child Abuse Negl. 2020 Dec;110(Pt 3):104679
pubmed: 32826062
J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13
pubmed: 11556941
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2020 Feb 27;11(1):1724416
pubmed: 32166006
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Dec;59(11):2335-59
pubmed: 15450708
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2016 Jul;17(3):306-13
pubmed: 25951839
World Psychiatry. 2018 Feb;17(1):24-25
pubmed: 29352543
Psychol Serv. 2014 Feb;11(1):75-86
pubmed: 23937082
J Trauma Stress. 2019 Aug;32(4):566-576
pubmed: 31265178
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2009 Apr;43(4):373-85
pubmed: 19296294
Child Welfare. 2011;90(6):149-68
pubmed: 22533047