Barriers and enablers to implementing and using clinical decision support systems for chronic diseases: a qualitative systematic review and meta-aggregation.
CDS
CDSS
Chronic disease
Clinical decision support systems
Evaluation
Health system
Implementation
Meta-aggregation
Qualitative
Systematic review
Journal
Implementation science communications
ISSN: 2662-2211
Titre abrégé: Implement Sci Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101764360
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Jul 2022
28 Jul 2022
Historique:
received:
13
12
2021
accepted:
10
07
2022
entrez:
28
7
2022
pubmed:
29
7
2022
medline:
29
7
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Clinical decision support (CDS) is increasingly used to facilitate chronic disease care. Despite increased availability of electronic health records and the ongoing development of new CDS technologies, uptake of CDS into routine clinical settings is inconsistent. This qualitative systematic review seeks to synthesise healthcare provider experiences of CDS-exploring the barriers and enablers to implementing, using, evaluating, and sustaining chronic disease CDS systems. A search was conducted in Medline, CINAHL, APA PsychInfo, EconLit, and Web of Science from 2011 to 2021. Primary research studies incorporating qualitative findings were included if they targeted healthcare providers and studied a relevant chronic disease CDS intervention. Relevant CDS interventions were electronic health record-based and addressed one or more of the following chronic diseases: cardiovascular disease, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, and hypercholesterolaemia. Qualitative findings were synthesised using a meta-aggregative approach. Thirty-three primary research articles were included in this qualitative systematic review. Meta-aggregation of qualitative data revealed 177 findings and 29 categories, which were aggregated into 8 synthesised findings. The synthesised findings related to clinical context, user, external context, and technical factors affecting CDS uptake. Key barriers to uptake included CDS systems that were simplistic, had limited clinical applicability in multimorbidity, and integrated poorly into existing workflows. Enablers to successful CDS interventions included perceived usefulness in providing relevant clinical knowledge and structured chronic disease care; user confidence gained through training and post training follow-up; external contexts comprised of strong clinical champions, allocated personnel, and technical support; and CDS technical features that are both highly functional, and attractive. This systematic review explored healthcare provider experiences, focussing on barriers and enablers to CDS use for chronic diseases. The results provide an evidence-base for designing, implementing, and sustaining future CDS systems. Based on the findings from this review, we highlight actionable steps for practice and future research. PROSPERO CRD42020203716.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Clinical decision support (CDS) is increasingly used to facilitate chronic disease care. Despite increased availability of electronic health records and the ongoing development of new CDS technologies, uptake of CDS into routine clinical settings is inconsistent. This qualitative systematic review seeks to synthesise healthcare provider experiences of CDS-exploring the barriers and enablers to implementing, using, evaluating, and sustaining chronic disease CDS systems.
METHODS
METHODS
A search was conducted in Medline, CINAHL, APA PsychInfo, EconLit, and Web of Science from 2011 to 2021. Primary research studies incorporating qualitative findings were included if they targeted healthcare providers and studied a relevant chronic disease CDS intervention. Relevant CDS interventions were electronic health record-based and addressed one or more of the following chronic diseases: cardiovascular disease, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, and hypercholesterolaemia. Qualitative findings were synthesised using a meta-aggregative approach.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Thirty-three primary research articles were included in this qualitative systematic review. Meta-aggregation of qualitative data revealed 177 findings and 29 categories, which were aggregated into 8 synthesised findings. The synthesised findings related to clinical context, user, external context, and technical factors affecting CDS uptake. Key barriers to uptake included CDS systems that were simplistic, had limited clinical applicability in multimorbidity, and integrated poorly into existing workflows. Enablers to successful CDS interventions included perceived usefulness in providing relevant clinical knowledge and structured chronic disease care; user confidence gained through training and post training follow-up; external contexts comprised of strong clinical champions, allocated personnel, and technical support; and CDS technical features that are both highly functional, and attractive.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review explored healthcare provider experiences, focussing on barriers and enablers to CDS use for chronic diseases. The results provide an evidence-base for designing, implementing, and sustaining future CDS systems. Based on the findings from this review, we highlight actionable steps for practice and future research.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
PROSPERO CRD42020203716.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35902894
doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00326-x
pii: 10.1186/s43058-022-00326-x
pmc: PMC9330991
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
81Subventions
Organisme : RACGP Foundation
ID : SIL2020-05
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
J Ambul Care Manage. 2019 Apr/Jun;42(2):105-115
pubmed: 30768429
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Dec 05;13(4):e111
pubmed: 22155738
Sociol Health Illn. 2011 Nov;33(7):1002-18
pubmed: 21671947
Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 09;1:28
pubmed: 22681772
BMJ. 2020 Sep 17;370:m3216
pubmed: 32943437
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Oct 1;4(10):978-986
pubmed: 31461123
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2014 Apr 01;14(3):1-37
pubmed: 24748911
Int J Med Inform. 2015 Jun;84(6):387-95
pubmed: 25765963
J Healthc Inf Manag. 2009 Fall;23(4):38-45
pubmed: 19894486
J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2017 Dec;29(12):741-753
pubmed: 28875593
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Aug 10;17(1):118
pubmed: 28797295
Aust J Gen Pract. 2018 Jun;47(6):383-388
pubmed: 29966185
BMC Nephrol. 2014 Dec 15;15:200
pubmed: 25511564
Inform Prim Care. 2008;16(2):79-91
pubmed: 18713524
JMIR Med Inform. 2015 Jan 07;3(1):e4
pubmed: 25785897
Yale J Biol Med. 2014 Jun 06;87(2):187-97
pubmed: 24910564
Implement Sci. 2018 Aug 20;13(1):114
pubmed: 30126421
J Biomed Inform. 2018 Feb;78:134-143
pubmed: 29246790
Aust Fam Physician. 2017 Oct;46(10):764-768
pubmed: 29036778
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Sep 27;21(9):e14255
pubmed: 31573934
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 10;22(6):e15068
pubmed: 32519968
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Jan-Feb;17(1):25-33
pubmed: 20064798
Implement Sci. 2015 Apr 21;10:53
pubmed: 25895742
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 May 1;25(5):538-547
pubmed: 29409033
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2015;109(2):97-102
pubmed: 26028446
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;216:406-9
pubmed: 26262081
Yearb Med Inform. 2020 Aug;29(1):145-154
pubmed: 32823308
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2018 Mar;44(3):117-129
pubmed: 29499808
Am J Med Qual. 2019 May-Jun;34(3):276-283
pubmed: 30196708
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71
pubmed: 33782057
Implement Sci. 2019 Dec 5;14(1):100
pubmed: 31805968
Diabet Med. 2018 Dec;35(12):1644-1654
pubmed: 30142228
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Feb 6;3:17
pubmed: 32047862
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Jun 2;172(11 Suppl):S101-S109
pubmed: 32479177
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Aug 16;19(1):163
pubmed: 31419982
Implement Sci. 2016 Oct 26;11(1):146
pubmed: 27782832
BMC Fam Pract. 2019 Dec 6;20(1):170
pubmed: 31810441
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Jul 03;12:61
pubmed: 22759239
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Jan 25;4(Suppl 1):e000882
pubmed: 30775015
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Aug 1;27(8):1225-1234
pubmed: 32719880
Implement Sci. 2018 Nov 12;13(1):140
pubmed: 30419934
JBI Evid Synth. 2021 Apr 8;19(5):1119-1139
pubmed: 33989268
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1987;3(1):123-36
pubmed: 10282217
J Am Board Fam Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;29(5):604-12
pubmed: 27613793
Milbank Q. 1996;74(4):511-44
pubmed: 8941260
Soc Work. 1996 May;41(3):296-305
pubmed: 8936085
Health Aff (Millwood). 2001 Nov-Dec;20(6):64-78
pubmed: 11816692
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Jul 3;157(1):29-43
pubmed: 22751758
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 May-Jun;21(3):487-91
pubmed: 24166725
Med Educ. 2013 Mar;47(3):252-60
pubmed: 23398011
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 May 1;25(5):585-592
pubmed: 29126196
Int J Med Inform. 2008 Jun;77(6):386-98
pubmed: 17964851
Int J Med Inform. 2015 Dec;84(12):1009-18
pubmed: 26391601
Int J Med Inform. 2015 Mar;84(3):207-19
pubmed: 25612791
Aust Health Rev. 2021 Jun;45(3):311-316
pubmed: 33583487
BMJ. 2020 Sep 17;370:m3499
pubmed: 32943393
Implement Sci. 2009 Aug 07;4:50
pubmed: 19664226
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jan 8;21(1):50
pubmed: 33419430
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2014 Dec 08;2(4):e54
pubmed: 25487047
BMC Med. 2019 Dec 30;17(1):233
pubmed: 31888718
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2013 Jun 20;1(1):1026
pubmed: 25848566
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Sep 1;25(9):1137-1146
pubmed: 29982627
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2019 Dec;26(1):
pubmed: 31818828
Am J Public Health. 2014 Dec;104(12):e12-22
pubmed: 25322302
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015 Apr 24;15:35
pubmed: 25903564
BMJ Open. 2015 Jul 06;5(7):e006775
pubmed: 26150141
Implement Sci. 2013 Mar 23;8:35
pubmed: 23522377
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015 Apr 29;15:36
pubmed: 25924825
Int J Med Inform. 2020 May;137:104072
pubmed: 32200295
J Adv Nurs. 2011 Jul;67(7):1632-42
pubmed: 21466579
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Feb;98:56-64
pubmed: 28034413
BMC Med. 2010 Oct 20;8:63
pubmed: 20961442
JAMIA Open. 2021 Jul 31;4(3):ooab041
pubmed: 34345802
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Apr 23;28(5):899-906
pubmed: 33566093
Glob Health Action. 2018;11(1):1517930
pubmed: 30253691
JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Oct;18(10):2127-2133
pubmed: 33038125
BMJ. 2005 Apr 2;330(7494):765
pubmed: 15767266
BMC Fam Pract. 2015 Oct 16;16:141
pubmed: 26474603
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015 Sep;13(3):179-87
pubmed: 26262565
Health Informatics J. 2021 Apr-Jun;27(2):14604582211007536
pubmed: 33853395
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Nov 01;19(11):e367
pubmed: 29092808
Am J Manag Care. 2011 Dec;17(12 Spec No.):SP95-102
pubmed: 22216774
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Mar;24(3):228-38
pubmed: 25616279
JMIR Med Inform. 2016 Feb 08;4(1):e4
pubmed: 26858218
Implement Sci. 2022 Mar 10;17(1):21
pubmed: 35272667
Implement Sci. 2017 Sep 15;12(1):113
pubmed: 28915822
Int J Med Inform. 2001 Nov;64(1):15-37
pubmed: 11673100
Open Med Inform J. 2010;4:235-44
pubmed: 21603283
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018 Mar;12(2):381-388
pubmed: 28905658
Med Care. 2019 Jun;57 Suppl 6 Suppl 2:S164-S171
pubmed: 31095056
Nurs Inq. 2019 Jan;26(1):e12273
pubmed: 30667158
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Jun 10;19(1):108
pubmed: 31182084
Br J Gen Pract. 2018 Dec;68(677):e844-e851
pubmed: 30397015
Int J Med Inform. 2021 Aug;152:104506
pubmed: 34091146