Surface electromyographic activity of trunk muscles during trunk control exercises for people after stroke; effect of a mobile and stable seat for rehabilitation.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
25
01
2022
accepted:
18
07
2022
entrez:
29
7
2022
pubmed:
30
7
2022
medline:
3
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to explore differences in trunk muscle activity on a stable and mobile seat for people after stroke and healthy participants. Trunk control exercises are known to have a beneficial effect on trunk control, balance, and mobility after stroke. The effect of such exercises could be enhanced by the use of a mobile seat to provide further training stimuli. However, little research on the musculoskeletal effects of trunk training on mobile seats has been carried out. On a stable and a mobile seat, thirteen people after stroke and fifteen healthy participants performed two selective trunk control exercises, which were lateral flexion initiated by the pelvis and the thorax. The maximal surface electromyography relative to static sitting of the muscles multifidus, erector spinae, and obliquus externus was recorded bilaterally. The effects of group, seat condition, trunk control exercise, and muscle side were investigated employing within-subject linear-mixed-models. Compared to the stable seat, the maximal muscle activity of people after stroke on the mobile seat was higher during the thorax-initiated exercise and lower during the pelvis-initiated exercise. Healthy participants showed opposite results with higher muscle activity on the mobile seat during the pelvis-initiated exercise. For trunk control training on a mobile seat with high muscle activation people after stroke should perform trunk control exercises initiated by the thorax, for training with lower muscle activity people after stroke should initiate selective trunk movements by the pelvis. The results can support the planning of progressive trunk control rehabilitation programs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35905083
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272382
pii: PONE-D-22-02457
pmc: PMC9337656
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0272382Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: Daniel Baumgartner is the owner of rotavis AG (Winterthur, Switzerland), the company that implements the mobile seat system. All other authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998 Jun;79(6):663-9
pubmed: 9630146
Ann Rehabil Med. 2015 Feb;39(1):66-73
pubmed: 25750874
Clin Rehabil. 2017 Nov;31(11):1492-1499
pubmed: 28351168
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021 Jul 28;18(1):120
pubmed: 34321042
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019 Nov 4;16(1):131
pubmed: 31684970
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008 Mar-Apr;22(2):173-9
pubmed: 17876069
Gait Posture. 2012 May;36(1):7-15
pubmed: 22440758
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Jan;100(1):172-180
pubmed: 30267669
Int J Stroke. 2013 Jan;8(1):25-32
pubmed: 23280266
Gait Posture. 2008 Oct;28(3):507-12
pubmed: 18424149
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1999 Jul;14(6):389-95
pubmed: 10521620
Age Ageing. 1996 Nov;25(6):479-89
pubmed: 9003886
Man Ther. 2008 Feb;13(1):43-9
pubmed: 17070721
Sports Med. 2006;36(3):189-98
pubmed: 16526831
J Nippon Med Sch. 2005 Jun;72(3):165-73
pubmed: 16046833
NeuroRehabilitation. 2013;33(4):575-92
pubmed: 24018373
Lancet Neurol. 2007 Feb;6(2):182-7
pubmed: 17239805
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012 Mar-Apr;26(3):231-8
pubmed: 21844283
NeuroRehabilitation. 2014 Jan 1;35(2):215-20
pubmed: 24990016
Neuroepidemiology. 2015;45(3):161-76
pubmed: 26505981
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006 Jan;36(1):19-25
pubmed: 16494070
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007 Jul;78(7):694-8
pubmed: 17178824
Hum Factors. 2016 Sep;58(6):886-98
pubmed: 27150530
Appl Ergon. 2021 Jul;94:103390
pubmed: 33640840
Front Neurol. 2018 Jun 25;9:472
pubmed: 29988530
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1998 Jan-Feb;38(1):51-8
pubmed: 9532434
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2003 Apr;27(1):48-54
pubmed: 12812327
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2009 Oct;13(4):364-7
pubmed: 19761961
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Feb;83(2):81-7
pubmed: 14758293
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Jul;41(15):1751-1759
pubmed: 29502464
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2014 Feb;24(1):114-9
pubmed: 24295543
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017 Mar;31(3):240-249
pubmed: 27821673
Gait Posture. 2010 May;32(1):53-6
pubmed: 20399661
Neural Regen Res. 2012 Sep 5;7(25):1974-7
pubmed: 25624827
Clin Rehabil. 2006 May;20(5):451-8
pubmed: 16774097
Gerontology. 1996;42(6):348-53
pubmed: 8930622
Appl Ergon. 2018 Oct;72:107-112
pubmed: 29885721
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2011 Apr;21(2):327-32
pubmed: 21071243
Stroke. 2010 Oct;41(10):2402-48
pubmed: 20813995
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 04;9(2):e87987
pubmed: 24505342
Disabil Rehabil. 2002 Nov 20;24(17):875-86
pubmed: 12519483
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2015 Jun;30(5):411-7
pubmed: 25846325
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1983 Jan;64(1):24-8
pubmed: 6849630
Stroke. 2002 Nov;33(11):2626-30
pubmed: 12411652
Lancet Neurol. 2021 Oct;20(10):795-820
pubmed: 34487721
J Phys Ther Sci. 2013 Jun;25(6):741-5
pubmed: 24259843