Improving routine prenatal penicillin allergy testing for reported penicillin allergy.
antibiotic management
healthcare quality improvement
obstetrics and gynecology
primary care
quality improvement
Journal
BMJ open quality
ISSN: 2399-6641
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open Qual
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101710381
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2022
07 2022
Historique:
received:
14
02
2022
accepted:
28
06
2022
entrez:
29
7
2022
pubmed:
30
7
2022
medline:
3
8
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Patients with self-reported antibiotic allergies have a higher cost of care, more frequent infections with resistant bacteria and worse health outcomes than patients without antibiotic allergies. Ultimately, less than 5% of patients who report a penicillin allergy have a clinically significant immune-mediated hypersensitivity reaction when tested. As 10%-30% of the population of pregnant patients are colonised for group B In this quality improvement project, nursing staff used an algorithm outlining inclusion and exclusion criteria to determine which patients were eligible to have penicillin allergy testing completed. Penicillin allergy testing consisted of a skin test using benzylpenicilloyl polylysine (Pre-Pen), penicillin G potassium, amoxicillin and alkaline hydrolysis mix (penicilloate) as a prick skin test, followed by intradermal skin test and finally an oral challenge with either amoxicillin or penicillin. Patient outcomes were analysed to evaluate the impact of the intervention. Of the 1266 patients receiving prenatal care during the intervention, 236 (19%) reported a history of penicillin allergy, and 212 if these were eligible for testing. 150 of the eligible patients were offered penicillin allergy testing. 101 patients (67%) completed testing and 49 (33%) declined testing. Seven patients (7%) had positive penicillin allergy testing, while 94 patients (93%) had negative penicillin allergy testing and were immediately de-labelled as penicillin allergic. Seventeen of the de-labelled patients subsequently tested positive for GBS colonisation, and all received intrapartum penicillin without adverse events. Pursuing penicillin allergy testing for pregnant patients with reported penicillin allergy is a safe and feasible approach, allowing for allergy de-labelling and safe, guideline-driven antimicrobial therapy during subsequent labour and delivery hospitalisations. Cost-effectiveness of the allergy testing and impact on later episodes of care should be further investigated.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Patients with self-reported antibiotic allergies have a higher cost of care, more frequent infections with resistant bacteria and worse health outcomes than patients without antibiotic allergies. Ultimately, less than 5% of patients who report a penicillin allergy have a clinically significant immune-mediated hypersensitivity reaction when tested. As 10%-30% of the population of pregnant patients are colonised for group B
METHODS AND INTERVENTION
In this quality improvement project, nursing staff used an algorithm outlining inclusion and exclusion criteria to determine which patients were eligible to have penicillin allergy testing completed. Penicillin allergy testing consisted of a skin test using benzylpenicilloyl polylysine (Pre-Pen), penicillin G potassium, amoxicillin and alkaline hydrolysis mix (penicilloate) as a prick skin test, followed by intradermal skin test and finally an oral challenge with either amoxicillin or penicillin. Patient outcomes were analysed to evaluate the impact of the intervention.
RESULTS
Of the 1266 patients receiving prenatal care during the intervention, 236 (19%) reported a history of penicillin allergy, and 212 if these were eligible for testing. 150 of the eligible patients were offered penicillin allergy testing. 101 patients (67%) completed testing and 49 (33%) declined testing. Seven patients (7%) had positive penicillin allergy testing, while 94 patients (93%) had negative penicillin allergy testing and were immediately de-labelled as penicillin allergic. Seventeen of the de-labelled patients subsequently tested positive for GBS colonisation, and all received intrapartum penicillin without adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS
Pursuing penicillin allergy testing for pregnant patients with reported penicillin allergy is a safe and feasible approach, allowing for allergy de-labelling and safe, guideline-driven antimicrobial therapy during subsequent labour and delivery hospitalisations. Cost-effectiveness of the allergy testing and impact on later episodes of care should be further investigated.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35906008
pii: bmjoq-2022-001859
doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001859
pmc: PMC9345039
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Bacterial Agents
0
Penicillins
0
Amoxicillin
804826J2HU
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: RT has research funding and know-how agreements with HeraMed, unrelated to this project.
Références
Pediatrics. 2019 Aug;144(2):
pubmed: 31285392
JAMA. 1979 Mar 23;241(12):1245-7
pubmed: 368363
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Oct;8(9S):S16-S116
pubmed: 33039007
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2010 Oct;105(4):259-273
pubmed: 20934625
Arch Intern Med. 2002 Apr 8;162(7):822-6
pubmed: 11926858
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019 Jul - Aug;7(6):1876-1885.e3
pubmed: 30878711
Intern Med J. 2016 Nov;46(11):1276-1283
pubmed: 27530619
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2006 Nov;97(5):681-7
pubmed: 17165279
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2014 Nov;14(11):476
pubmed: 25216741
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2022 May;128(5):568-574
pubmed: 35123076
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 16;11(3):e0150514
pubmed: 26981866
Am J Perinatol. 2016 Apr;33(5):510-7
pubmed: 26683604
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Jan 18;66(3):329-336
pubmed: 29361015
JAMA. 2019 Jan 15;321(2):188-199
pubmed: 30644987
Allergy. 2003 Oct;58(10):961-72
pubmed: 14510712
Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Jan;91(1):112-4
pubmed: 9464732
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017 Mar - Apr;5(2):333-334
pubmed: 28283158
Allergy. 2009 Feb;64(2):249-53
pubmed: 19133924
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018 Jan - Feb;6(1):82-89
pubmed: 28958745
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2020 Dec;125(6):646-651
pubmed: 32798617
Int J Clin Pract. 2018 Mar;72(3):e13058
pubmed: 29341373
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2020 Oct;42(10):1254-1261.e3
pubmed: 32005632
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Nov 06;65(suppl_2):S100-S111
pubmed: 29117327
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 Mar;9(3):1338-1346
pubmed: 33212237
N Engl J Med. 1986 Jun 26;314(26):1665-9
pubmed: 3520319
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2006 Aug;97(2):164-8
pubmed: 16937745
J Infect Dis. 1983 Nov;148(5):810-6
pubmed: 6355318
Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jan 1;137(1):56-61
pubmed: 33278285