Two-lung ventilation in video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy in prone position: a systematic review.
Esophagectomy
One-lung ventilation
Systematic review
Two-lung ventilation
Video-assisted thoracoscopy
Journal
Anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine
ISSN: 2352-5568
Titre abrégé: Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med
Pays: France
ID NLM: 101652401
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2022
10 2022
Historique:
received:
21
04
2022
revised:
15
06
2022
accepted:
18
06
2022
pubmed:
31
7
2022
medline:
15
9
2022
entrez:
30
7
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Esophageal cancer surgery is still carrying a high risk of morbidity and mortality. That is why some anesthesia strategies have tried to reduce those postoperative complications. In this systematic review performed in accordance with the PRISMA-S guidelines (PROSPERO (ID: CRD42022310385)), we aimed to investigate the safety and advantages of two-lung ventilation (TLV) over one-lung ventilation (OLV) in minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) in the prone position. Seven trials, with a total number of 1710 patients (765 patients with TLV versus 945 patients with OLV) were included. Postoperative mortality and morbidity rates were similar between TLV and OLV when realised for esophagectomy. Interestingly, we observed no difference in changes in intraoperative respiratory parameters, operative duration, thoraco-conversion rate, number of harvested lymph nodes, postoperative heart rate and respiratory rate between TLV and OLV. TLV brings better results in terms of intraoperative oxygen arterial pressure (PaO
Identifiants
pubmed: 35907597
pii: S2352-5568(22)00115-1
doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2022.101134
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Oxygen
S88TT14065
Types de publication
Journal Article
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
101134Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Société française d'anesthésie et de réanimation (Sfar). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.