Age over 50 does not predict results in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
meta-analysis
over 50 of age
Journal
Orthopedic reviews
ISSN: 2035-8164
Titre abrégé: Orthop Rev (Pavia)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101524779
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
21
12
2021
accepted:
28
12
2021
entrez:
1
8
2022
pubmed:
2
8
2022
medline:
2
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Grown in the worldwide population of over 50 of age individuals who remain in good health and continue to engage in sports has led to an increase of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears in this aged population. ACL reconstruction was reserved for young and active athletes, but seems to produce good outcomes also in over 50s. To compare the patient-reported functional scores, arthrometric outcomes, and complications of primary ACL reconstruction between older (>50 years) and younger (<50 years) patients. A systematic review was performed on Pubmed, Scopus, Google Scholar and Cochrane library regarding studies that compared the clinical outcomes of ACLR between patients aged > 50 years and those aged < 50 years. The outcomes evaluated were knee functional outcomes, antero-posterior laxity and complications rate. This study included 5 retrospective cohort studies with a total of 645 patients (357 in the older 50 group and 288 in the younger group). All included studies reported significant improvements in clinical outcomes in both groups after ACL reconstruction. No significant differences were noted in terms of International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Lysholm, Tegner scores and anteroposterior instability between the two groups (p = n.s.). Over 50 cohort seem to have an increased risk for complication rate when compared with the younger cohort (p= 0.0005). ACL reconstruction in patients older than 50 years is a safe procedure with good results that are comparable to those of younger patients. Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 3.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35909418
doi: 10.52965/001c.37310
pii: 37310
pmc: PMC9329056
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
37310Références
Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Apr 29;8(4):2325967120915698
pubmed: 32426406
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Nov;28(11):3686-3693
pubmed: 32886155
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Dec;105(8S):S259-S265
pubmed: 31648996
Orthop J Sports Med. 2017 Oct 02;5(10):2325967117729659
pubmed: 29051896
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Sep;29(9):2987-3000
pubmed: 33108528
Sports Health. 2021 May-Jun;13(3):285-289
pubmed: 33301359
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Nov;90(11):1446-50
pubmed: 18978263
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Jul;26(7):1966-1974
pubmed: 29032484
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Jul;46(8):2011-2019
pubmed: 28982255
ANZ J Surg. 2003 Sep;73(9):712-6
pubmed: 12956787
Knee. 2014 Dec;21(6):1166-8
pubmed: 25174853
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Mar;45(4):832-837
pubmed: 28056178
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994 Sep;76(9):1315-21
pubmed: 8077261
BMJ. 2015 Jan 02;350:g7647
pubmed: 25555855
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Feb;22(2):379-86
pubmed: 24318509
Int Orthop. 2013 May;37(5):809-17
pubmed: 23377111
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Nov;27(11):3679-3691
pubmed: 30944945
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Dec;105(8S):S247-S251
pubmed: 31564634
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Jan;27(1):230-238
pubmed: 30600340
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 Mar;19(3):412-7
pubmed: 20734026
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Jun;28(6):1932-1945
pubmed: 31463553
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Jun;27(6):1754-1770
pubmed: 30830297
Sports Health. 2016 Mar-Apr;8(2):177-81
pubmed: 26674619
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2014;72(4):277-83
pubmed: 25986352
Arthroscopy. 2020 Feb;36(2):558-562
pubmed: 31901387
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2003 Jul;11(4):204-11
pubmed: 12761610
Arthroscopy. 2020 Jun;36(6):1647-1648
pubmed: 32503775
Int Orthop. 2018 May;42(5):1043-1049
pubmed: 29532113