Ultrasonic Vocalizations in Adult C57BL/6J Mice: The Role of Sex Differences and Repeated Testing.

isolation repeated testing sex social behaviors ultrasonic communication

Journal

Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience
ISSN: 1662-5153
Titre abrégé: Front Behav Neurosci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101477952

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 25 02 2022
accepted: 20 06 2022
entrez: 1 8 2022
pubmed: 2 8 2022
medline: 2 8 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs) are a major tool for assessing social communication in laboratory mice during their entire lifespan. At adulthood, male mice preferentially emit USVs toward a female conspecific, while females mostly produce ultrasonic calls when facing an adult intruder of the same sex. Recent studies have developed several sophisticated tools to analyze adult mouse USVs, especially in males, because of the increasing relevance of adult communication for behavioral phenotyping of mouse models of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Little attention has been instead devoted to adult female USVs and impact of sex differences on the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of mouse USVs. Most of the studies have also focused on a single testing session, often without concomitant assessment of other social behaviors (e.g., sniffing), so little is still known about the link between USVs and other aspects of social interaction and their stability/variations across multiple encounters. Here, we evaluated the USVs emitted by adult male and female mice during 3 repeated encounters with an unfamiliar female, with equal or different pre-testing isolation periods between sexes. We demonstrated clear sex differences in several USVs' characteristics and other social behaviors, and these were mostly stable across the encounters and independent of pre-testing isolation. The estrous cycle of the tested females exerted quantitative effects on their vocal and non-vocal behaviors, although it did not affect the qualitative composition of ultrasonic calls. Our findings obtained in B6 mice, i.e., the strain most widely used for engineering of transgenic mouse lines, contribute to provide new guidelines for assessing ultrasonic communication in male and female adult mice.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35910678
doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.883353
pmc: PMC9330122
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

883353

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Premoli, Petroni, Bulthuis, Bonini and Pietropaolo.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

RB is an employee of Metris B.V. and co-developer of the SONOTRACK Call Classification software. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Neural Regen Res. 2021 Jun;16(6):1158-1167
pubmed: 33269765
Behav Brain Res. 2007 Sep 4;182(2):223-30
pubmed: 17336405
PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e29401
pubmed: 22238608
PLoS Biol. 2005 Dec;3(12):e386
pubmed: 16248680
J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1981 Aug;95(4):623-9
pubmed: 7276284
Brain Lang. 2013 Jan;124(1):96-116
pubmed: 23295209
Behav Neurosci. 2001 Aug;115(4):834-40
pubmed: 11508722
Autism Res. 2017 Oct;10(10):1584-1596
pubmed: 28590057
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2015 Mar 13;40(5):1113-22
pubmed: 25348604
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2014 Aug 01;9:124
pubmed: 25079250
Autism Res. 2021 Sep;14(9):1854-1872
pubmed: 34173729
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 25;10(3):e0121802
pubmed: 25806942
PLoS Comput Biol. 2020 Jun 22;16(6):e1007918
pubmed: 32569292
Curr Protoc Neurosci. 2009 Jul;Appendix 4:Appendix 4I
pubmed: 19575469
Nature. 2020 Feb;578(7793):137-141
pubmed: 31996852
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20631
pubmed: 21695253
PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e22093
pubmed: 21818297
PLoS One. 2014 May 09;9(5):e97244
pubmed: 24816836
Anim Cogn. 2020 Mar;23(2):351-359
pubmed: 31925602
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2014 Nov;49:119-29
pubmed: 25080404
Genes Brain Behav. 2016 Feb;15(2):243-59
pubmed: 26566793
Elife. 2015 May 28;4:
pubmed: 26020291
Behav Brain Res. 2017 Mar 1;320:128-135
pubmed: 27939692
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 19;16(1):e0244636
pubmed: 33465075
Front Behav Neurosci. 2016 Mar 09;10:38
pubmed: 27014000
R Soc Open Sci. 2018 Jun 20;5(6):180378
pubmed: 30110406
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e41133
pubmed: 22815941
Neuropharmacology. 2019 Nov 15;159:107420
pubmed: 30445100
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 1;16(9):e0255640
pubmed: 34469457
J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1973 Sep;84(3):445-52
pubmed: 4745813
Front Behav Neurosci. 2015 Apr 01;9:76
pubmed: 25883559
J Comp Psychol. 1985 Dec;99(4):420-36
pubmed: 4075780
J Neurosci. 2013 Mar 27;33(13):5573-83
pubmed: 23536072
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 May 13;100(10):6192-7
pubmed: 12730370
Behav Neurosci. 2009 Feb;123(1):181-95
pubmed: 19170443
Behav Neural Biol. 1983 May;38(1):32-46
pubmed: 6626099
Anim Behav. 2000 Nov;60(5):689-694
pubmed: 11082239
Front Behav Neurosci. 2021 Oct 13;15:735920
pubmed: 34720899
Exp Neurobiol. 2016 Aug;25(4):156-62
pubmed: 27574482
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020 Sep;116:31-43
pubmed: 32544538
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2016 Jun;38:1-5
pubmed: 26789140
Autism Res. 2017 Jun;10(6):1067-1078
pubmed: 28301083
Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 4;9(1):15912
pubmed: 31685905
PLoS One. 2011 Feb 22;6(2):e17073
pubmed: 21364941
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 13;12(12):e0188647
pubmed: 29236704
J Vis Exp. 2016 Jun 05;(112):
pubmed: 27341321
Genes Brain Behav. 2011 Feb;10(1):4-16
pubmed: 20497235
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40782
pubmed: 22815817
PLoS One. 2011 Mar 09;6(3):e17721
pubmed: 21408017

Auteurs

Marika Premoli (M)

Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.

Valeria Petroni (V)

Univ. Bordeaux, CNRS, INCIA, UMR 5287, Bordeaux, France.

Ronald Bulthuis (R)

Metris B.V., Hoofddorp, Netherlands.

Sara Anna Bonini (SA)

Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.

Susanna Pietropaolo (S)

Univ. Bordeaux, CNRS, INCIA, UMR 5287, Bordeaux, France.

Classifications MeSH