Effectiveness of Nature- and Animal Assisted Mindfulness for Relapse Prevention in Depressed Patients With a History of Childhood Maltreatment.
animal assisted
childhood maltreatment
depression prevention
early life trauma
mindfulness based intervention
nature based
psychotherapy
randomized controlled trial
Journal
Frontiers in psychiatry
ISSN: 1664-0640
Titre abrégé: Front Psychiatry
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101545006
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
18
03
2022
accepted:
09
06
2022
entrez:
1
8
2022
pubmed:
2
8
2022
medline:
2
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
For relapse prevention in depression, conventional mindfulness programs such as the mindfulness-based cognitive therapy proved to be useful. However, early life trauma is a risk factor for having adverse experiences during meditation. Thus, for this patient group mindfulness skills are often difficult to learn and may be facilitated by using animals and a nature setting. The aim of the study was to evaluate the preventative efficacy of a nature- and animal assisted mindfulness program (NAM) over the course of 1 year in unstable or partially remitted depressed patients with a history of early life trauma. NAM included 8 group sessions of 150 min each over 8 weeks plus one booster session. Sixty-seven participants were randomized to either NAM combined with treatment-as-usual (TAU; guideline oriented treatment) or TAU alone. The primary outcome was depression diagnosis over the course of 12 months after end of treatment. Secondary outcomes included clinician- and self-rated depressive symptoms, quality of life, mindfulness skills, and rumination post, and 12 months after the intervention. In addition, we evaluated the participants' satisfaction with the program. Analyses revealed significant differences in relapse rates and number of weeks depressed throughout the course in favor of NAM. Furthermore, global quality of life improved significantly more in the NAM group. There was no significant difference for other secondary outcomes. Satisfaction with the program was high with a low drop-out rate of 6%. The vast majority of the participants felt safe practicing mindfulness in nature and found sheep for assistance helpful and motivating. A nature- and animal assisted mindfulness program proved to be feasible, highly acceptable, and more effective than standard treatment in preventing relapses in recurrently depressed patients with childhood maltreatment. Nature and animals can facilitate the engagement in the treatment process for individuals with a history of early trauma. However, further evidence in multicenter trials is necessary.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
For relapse prevention in depression, conventional mindfulness programs such as the mindfulness-based cognitive therapy proved to be useful. However, early life trauma is a risk factor for having adverse experiences during meditation. Thus, for this patient group mindfulness skills are often difficult to learn and may be facilitated by using animals and a nature setting.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
The aim of the study was to evaluate the preventative efficacy of a nature- and animal assisted mindfulness program (NAM) over the course of 1 year in unstable or partially remitted depressed patients with a history of early life trauma. NAM included 8 group sessions of 150 min each over 8 weeks plus one booster session. Sixty-seven participants were randomized to either NAM combined with treatment-as-usual (TAU; guideline oriented treatment) or TAU alone. The primary outcome was depression diagnosis over the course of 12 months after end of treatment. Secondary outcomes included clinician- and self-rated depressive symptoms, quality of life, mindfulness skills, and rumination post, and 12 months after the intervention. In addition, we evaluated the participants' satisfaction with the program.
Results
UNASSIGNED
Analyses revealed significant differences in relapse rates and number of weeks depressed throughout the course in favor of NAM. Furthermore, global quality of life improved significantly more in the NAM group. There was no significant difference for other secondary outcomes. Satisfaction with the program was high with a low drop-out rate of 6%. The vast majority of the participants felt safe practicing mindfulness in nature and found sheep for assistance helpful and motivating.
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
A nature- and animal assisted mindfulness program proved to be feasible, highly acceptable, and more effective than standard treatment in preventing relapses in recurrently depressed patients with childhood maltreatment. Nature and animals can facilitate the engagement in the treatment process for individuals with a history of early trauma. However, further evidence in multicenter trials is necessary.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35911224
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.899318
pmc: PMC9329652
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
899318Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Schramm, Breuninger, Wohlfarth, Elsaesser, Piosczyk and Fangmeier.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
BMJ. 2006 May 6;332(7549):1080
pubmed: 16675816
Psychol Med. 1998 May;28(3):551-8
pubmed: 9626712
JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 Mar 1;78(3):261-269
pubmed: 33237285
Can J Psychiatry. 2019 Jan;64(1):39-46
pubmed: 29719964
Australas J Ageing. 2008 Dec;27(4):177-82
pubmed: 19032618
Clin Psychol Rev. 2011 Aug;31(6):1032-40
pubmed: 21802618
Psychol Med. 2010 Jan;40(1):41-50
pubmed: 19460188
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960 Feb;23:56-62
pubmed: 14399272
Animals (Basel). 2020 Apr 27;10(5):
pubmed: 32349351
Ann Intern Med. 2006 Feb 21;144(4):257-61
pubmed: 16490911
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2014 Apr;82(2):275-86
pubmed: 24294837
SSM Popul Health. 2021 Oct 01;16:100934
pubmed: 34646931
Psychother Res. 2021 Sep;31(7):859-869
pubmed: 33331244
Health Place. 2016 Mar;38:8-15
pubmed: 26796323
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2010 Nov;60(11):442-50
pubmed: 20200804
Psychother Psychosom. 2022;91(3):212-213
pubmed: 35158364
Depress Anxiety. 2013 Jul;30(7):638-45
pubmed: 23596092
Clin Psychol Rev. 2011 Dec;31(8):1349-60
pubmed: 22020371
Eur J Pain. 2009 Sep;13(8):865-9
pubmed: 19010075
Clin Psychol Rev. 2015 Nov;41:16-26
pubmed: 25754289
Mindfulness (N Y). 2020 Apr;11(4):975-990
pubmed: 32382357
Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2018 Nov;33:49-55
pubmed: 30396626
Front Psychol. 2019 Oct 23;10:2373
pubmed: 31749731
Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 25;8:1597
pubmed: 28993746
JAMA Psychiatry. 2016 Jun 1;73(6):565-74
pubmed: 27119968
J Affect Disord. 2016 Apr;194:144-52
pubmed: 26826534
Hemodial Int. 2012 Apr;16(2):207-13
pubmed: 22754932
Child Abuse Negl. 2003 Feb;27(2):169-90
pubmed: 12615092
Lancet. 2015 Jul 4;386(9988):63-73
pubmed: 25907157
Mult Scler. 2003 Aug;9(4):393-6
pubmed: 12926845
PLoS One. 2017 May 24;12(5):e0176239
pubmed: 28542181
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000 Aug;68(4):615-23
pubmed: 10965637
Child Maltreat. 2005 Nov;10(4):324-36
pubmed: 16204735
Curr Treat Options Psychiatry. 2021 Jun;8(2):31-46
pubmed: 33987076
J ECT. 2003 Mar;19(1):38-44
pubmed: 12621276
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 02;16(17):
pubmed: 31480748
J Child Sex Abus. 2012;21(2):155-75
pubmed: 22452299