The Advantages of Robotic Over Open Thyroidectomy in Thyroid Diseases: A Systematic Review.
advantages and disadvantages
complications
open thyroidectomy
robotic thyroidectomy
thyroid diseases
Journal
Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2022
Jun 2022
Historique:
received:
06
03
2022
accepted:
25
06
2022
entrez:
1
8
2022
pubmed:
2
8
2022
medline:
2
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Over a hundred thousand thyroid surgeries are performed per year in the United States. Although conventional thyroidectomy has successful surgical outcomes, robotic minimally invasive procedures, known for their scar free (regarding the neck, no collar incision) surgical outcomes gained popularity through the years. Furthermore, these techniques are new and still debatable. The purpose is to know the advantages of robotic over open thyroidectomy in thyroid diseases. Note that we didn't aim to compare different robotic techniques due to the lack of data. We performed a systematic review comparing surgical approaches for thyroidectomy, open vs robotic techniques, from January 2017 to December 2021, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. All papers with no full free article access and not in the English language were excluded. The outcomes of interest were superior cosmetics outcome, cost-effectiveness, limitations, operation time, length of hospital stay and postoperative pain or complications, and future outcomes. A literature search was carried out in electronic databases (PubMed, Google Scholar) in order to retrieve all papers comparing the effectiveness of robotic vs open thyroidectomy. An initial reference search yielded 433 articles. Finally, we chose nine studies covering different robotic thyroidectomy techniques compared to the open thyroidectomy approach. Promising results were seen in these studies, especially with superior cosmetic results, less post-operative pain, swallowing discomfort, and voice changes. In addition, the risk of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury is almost the same as the open approach. Multiple types of biases were caused by the selection of the population and the limitation of the studies to certain regions associated with the low numbers of robotic thyroidectomy approaches in Europe and the United States of America and the lack of randomized trials and long-term follow-up respectively. All studies discussed the importance of the surgeon's skills and the patient decision in choosing the appropriate approach for the thyroidectomy depending on the risk factors, a larger number of patients, and longer follow-up from multiple hospitals.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35911316
doi: 10.7759/cureus.26320
pmc: PMC9314274
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
e26320Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022, Haidar Ismail et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Gland Surg. 2017 Jun;6(3):250-257
pubmed: 28713696
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2018;80(3-4):186-194
pubmed: 29788019
Gland Surg. 2017 Jun;6(3):236-242
pubmed: 28713694
Gland Surg. 2020 Jan;9(Suppl 1):S61-S64
pubmed: 32055500
Surgery. 2021 Oct;170(4):1155-1159
pubmed: 34090673
Surg Innov. 2019 Feb;26(1):112-123
pubmed: 30501575
Gland Surg. 2021 Jun;10(6):1962-1970
pubmed: 34268080
Gland Surg. 2017 Jun;6(3):218-228
pubmed: 28713692
J Int Med Res. 2020 Apr;48(4):300060520914803
pubmed: 32249645
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2020 Dec;53(6):1031-1039
pubmed: 33127039
JSLS. 2021 Jul-Sep;25(3):
pubmed: 34354333
Gland Surg. 2017 Jun;6(3):285-289
pubmed: 28713701