Assessment and Diagnosis of Down Syndrome Regression Disorder: International Expert Consensus.
Down syndrome
consensus
criteria & indicators
encephalopathy
regression
Journal
Frontiers in neurology
ISSN: 1664-2295
Titre abrégé: Front Neurol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101546899
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
10
05
2022
accepted:
24
06
2022
entrez:
1
8
2022
pubmed:
2
8
2022
medline:
2
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To develop standardization for nomenclature, diagnostic work up and diagnostic criteria for cases of neurocognitive regression in Down syndrome. There are no consensus criteria for the evaluation or diagnosis of neurocognitive regression in persons with Down syndrome. As such, previously published data on this condition is relegated to smaller case series with heterogenous data sets. Lack of standardized assessment tools has slowed research in this clinical area. The authors performed a two-round traditional Delphi method survey of an international group of clinicians with experience in treating Down syndrome to develop a standardized approach to clinical care and research in this area. Thirty-eight potential panelists who had either previously published on neurocognitive regression in Down syndrome or were involved in national or international working groups on this condition were invited to participate. In total, 27 panelists (71%) represented nine medical specialties and six different countries reached agreement on preliminary standards in this disease area. Moderators developed a proposed nomenclature, diagnostic work up and diagnostic criteria based on previously published reports of regression in persons with Down syndrome. During the first round of survey, agreement on nomenclature for the condition was reached with 78% of panelists agreeing to use the term Down Syndrome Regression Disorder (DSRD). Agreement on diagnostic work up and diagnostic criteria was not reach on the first round due to low agreement amongst panelists with regards to the need for neurodiagnostic testing. Following incorporation of panelist feedback, diagnostic criteria were agreed upon (96% agreement on neuroimaging, 100% agreement on bloodwork, 88% agreement on lumbar puncture, 100% agreement on urine studies, and 96% agreement on "other" studies) as were diagnostic criteria (96% agreement). The authors present international consensus agreement on the nomenclature, diagnostic work up, and diagnostic criteria for DSRD, providing an initial practical framework that can advance both research and clinical practices for this condition.
Sections du résumé
Objective
UNASSIGNED
To develop standardization for nomenclature, diagnostic work up and diagnostic criteria for cases of neurocognitive regression in Down syndrome.
Background
UNASSIGNED
There are no consensus criteria for the evaluation or diagnosis of neurocognitive regression in persons with Down syndrome. As such, previously published data on this condition is relegated to smaller case series with heterogenous data sets. Lack of standardized assessment tools has slowed research in this clinical area.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
The authors performed a two-round traditional Delphi method survey of an international group of clinicians with experience in treating Down syndrome to develop a standardized approach to clinical care and research in this area. Thirty-eight potential panelists who had either previously published on neurocognitive regression in Down syndrome or were involved in national or international working groups on this condition were invited to participate. In total, 27 panelists (71%) represented nine medical specialties and six different countries reached agreement on preliminary standards in this disease area. Moderators developed a proposed nomenclature, diagnostic work up and diagnostic criteria based on previously published reports of regression in persons with Down syndrome.
Results
UNASSIGNED
During the first round of survey, agreement on nomenclature for the condition was reached with 78% of panelists agreeing to use the term Down Syndrome Regression Disorder (DSRD). Agreement on diagnostic work up and diagnostic criteria was not reach on the first round due to low agreement amongst panelists with regards to the need for neurodiagnostic testing. Following incorporation of panelist feedback, diagnostic criteria were agreed upon (96% agreement on neuroimaging, 100% agreement on bloodwork, 88% agreement on lumbar puncture, 100% agreement on urine studies, and 96% agreement on "other" studies) as were diagnostic criteria (96% agreement).
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
The authors present international consensus agreement on the nomenclature, diagnostic work up, and diagnostic criteria for DSRD, providing an initial practical framework that can advance both research and clinical practices for this condition.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35911905
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.940175
pmc: PMC9335003
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
940175Subventions
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : KL2 TR002381
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR002378
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Santoro, Patel, Kammeyer, Filipink, Gombolay, Cardinale, Real de Asua, Zaman, Santoro, Marzouk, Khoshnood, Vogel, Tanna, Pagarkar, Dhanani, Ortega, Partridge, Stanley, Sanders, Christy, Sannar, Brown, McCormick, Van Mater, Franklin, Worley, Quinn, Capone, Chicoine, Skotko and Rafii.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
JDS receives research support from the National Institutes of Health, the Race to Erase MS Foundation, and the Thrasher Society. He also serves as a consultant to UCB on myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody spectrum disorders. GG receives part-time salary support from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for acute flaccid myelitis disease surveillance. DA is supported by the Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias (FIS grant PI19/00634, from the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (Instituto de Salud Carlos III) and co-funded by The European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) “A way to make Europe” and the. Fondation Jérôme Lejeune (grant no. 2021a-2069). The Adult Down Syndrome Outpatient unit at Hospital Universitario de La Princesa is grateful to Licenciado don Jesús Coronado Hinojosa for his financial support of the research endeavors of our unit. BS occasionally consults on the topic of Down syndrome through Gerson Lehrman Group. He receives remuneration from Down syndrome nonprofit organizations for speaking engagements and associated travel expenses. BS receives annual royalties from Woodbine House, Inc., for the publication of his book, Fasten Your Seatbelt: A Crash Course on Down Syndrome for Brothers and Sisters. Within the past 2 years, he has received research funding from F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc., and LuMind Research Down Syndrome Foundation to conduct clinical trials for people with Down syndrome. BS is occasionally asked to serve as an expert witness for legal cases where Down syndrome is discussed. He serves in a nonpaid capacity on the Honorary Board of Directors for the Massachusetts Down Syndrome Congress and the Professional Advisory Committee for the National Center for Prenatal and Postnatal Down Syndrome Resources. BS has a sister with Down syndrome. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Res Dev Disabil. 2019 Jun;89:83-93
pubmed: 30959431
Brain Sci. 2017 May 27;7(6):
pubmed: 28555009
Am J Med Genet A. 2005 May 1;134(4):373-80
pubmed: 15759262
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2019 Sep 20;15:2723-2741
pubmed: 31571888
Transl Sci Rare Dis. 2021;5(3-4):99-129
pubmed: 34268067
J Neurodev Disord. 2022 Jun 3;14(1):35
pubmed: 35659536
J Autism Dev Disord. 1999 Apr;29(2):149-56
pubmed: 10382135
J Adv Nurs. 2000 Oct;32(4):1008-15
pubmed: 11095242
Brain Sci. 2021 Sep 10;11(9):
pubmed: 34573218
Front Neurol. 2021 Mar 26;12:621637
pubmed: 33841297
Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2020 Jan 17;7(2):
pubmed: 31953309
Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2007 Jan 5;144B(1):87-94
pubmed: 16958028
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81
pubmed: 18929686
Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2006 Aug 15;142C(3):158-72
pubmed: 16838318
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019 Jul;61(7):847-851
pubmed: 30548468
Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2021 Jul 22;8(5):
pubmed: 34301820
J Child Neurol. 2015 Aug;30(9):1147-52
pubmed: 25367918
Am J Med Genet A. 2015 Apr;167A(4):756-67
pubmed: 25822844
Pediatr Neurol. 2017 Mar;68:18-34.e3
pubmed: 28284397
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2015 Apr 02;11:941-9
pubmed: 25897230
Genet Med. 2016 May;18(5):459-66
pubmed: 27126496
Genet Med. 2020 Apr;22(4):767-776
pubmed: 31767984
Brain Sci. 2021 Sep 26;11(10):
pubmed: 34679343
Lancet Neurol. 2016 Apr;15(4):391-404
pubmed: 26906964
Intern Med J. 2019 May;49(5):578-591
pubmed: 30414226
Pediatrics. 2020 Jun;145(6):
pubmed: 32471843
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2022 Mar;66(3):282-296
pubmed: 34939724