Bridging Therapies With Injectable Immunomodulatory Drugs in the Management of Multiple Sclerosis: A Delphi Survey of an Italian Expert Panel of Neurologists.
Delphi survey
MS management
bridging therapy
injectable immunomodulatory drugs
multiple sclerosis
Journal
Frontiers in neurology
ISSN: 1664-2295
Titre abrégé: Front Neurol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101546899
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
17
03
2022
accepted:
20
06
2022
entrez:
1
8
2022
pubmed:
2
8
2022
medline:
2
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In multiple sclerosis (MS), bridging therapies are usually administered when switching from one therapy to another. Such treatments generally consist of injectable immunomodulatory drugs (interferon or glatiramer acetate), whose efficacy, safety, and tolerability data are consolidated for use even in fragile patients. We performed a nationwide survey to gather expert opinions regarding the most appropriate use of bridging therapies in MS. An independent steering committee of Italian neurologists with expertise in MS treatment identified critical issues in the use of bridging therapies and formulated a questionnaire. This questionnaire was used to conduct a Delphi web survey, involving a panel of Italian neurologists with experience in MS treatment. Their anonymous opinions were collected in three sequential rounds. Consensus was defined as an interquartile range (IQR) ≤2. Responses were obtained from 38 experts (100%) in all three rounds. Injectable immunomodulatory drugs were considered first-line therapy in patients with mild-to-moderate disease activity and in women planning to become pregnant. In addition, the experts were confident about prescribing these drugs in patients at risk of cancer recurrence, while the panel agreed to discontinue any treatments in patients with uncontrolled cardiovascular or metabolic disorders. Moreover, bridging therapy with injectable immunomodulatory drugs was considered appropriate in order to protect the patient from disease reactivation when a prolonged washout was needed and also while waiting for the completion of the immunization schedule. The results of this nationwide survey confirm that, among Italian neurologists, there was wide agreement on the use of bridging therapies with injectable immunomodulatory drugs in several conditions in order to minimize the risk of disease reactivation when a prolonged washout was required or when the immunization schedule still needed to be completed in patients planning to become pregnant and in patients at risk of cancer recurrence.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
In multiple sclerosis (MS), bridging therapies are usually administered when switching from one therapy to another. Such treatments generally consist of injectable immunomodulatory drugs (interferon or glatiramer acetate), whose efficacy, safety, and tolerability data are consolidated for use even in fragile patients. We performed a nationwide survey to gather expert opinions regarding the most appropriate use of bridging therapies in MS.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
An independent steering committee of Italian neurologists with expertise in MS treatment identified critical issues in the use of bridging therapies and formulated a questionnaire. This questionnaire was used to conduct a Delphi web survey, involving a panel of Italian neurologists with experience in MS treatment. Their anonymous opinions were collected in three sequential rounds. Consensus was defined as an interquartile range (IQR) ≤2.
Results
UNASSIGNED
Responses were obtained from 38 experts (100%) in all three rounds. Injectable immunomodulatory drugs were considered first-line therapy in patients with mild-to-moderate disease activity and in women planning to become pregnant. In addition, the experts were confident about prescribing these drugs in patients at risk of cancer recurrence, while the panel agreed to discontinue any treatments in patients with uncontrolled cardiovascular or metabolic disorders. Moreover, bridging therapy with injectable immunomodulatory drugs was considered appropriate in order to protect the patient from disease reactivation when a prolonged washout was needed and also while waiting for the completion of the immunization schedule.
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
The results of this nationwide survey confirm that, among Italian neurologists, there was wide agreement on the use of bridging therapies with injectable immunomodulatory drugs in several conditions in order to minimize the risk of disease reactivation when a prolonged washout was required or when the immunization schedule still needed to be completed in patients planning to become pregnant and in patients at risk of cancer recurrence.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35911920
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.898741
pmc: PMC9337240
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
898741Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Marfia, Centonze, Salvetti, Ferraro, Panetta, Gasperini, Mirabella and Conte.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
GM received honoraria for speaking, consultation fees, and travel funding from Roche, Almirall, Bayer Schering, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Mylan, and Teva. She is the principal investigator in clinical trials for Actelion, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Mitsubishi, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, and Teva. DC is an Advisory Board member of Almirall, Bayer Schering, Biogen, GW Pharmaceuticals, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, and Teva and received honoraria for speaking or consultation fees from Almirall, Bayer Schering, Biogen, GW Pharmaceuticals, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, and Teva. He is also the principal investigator in clinical trials for Bayer Schering, Biogen, Merck Serono, Mitsubishi, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, and Teva. His preclinical and clinical research was supported by grants from Bayer Schering, Biogen Idec, Celgene, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, and Teva. MS reports speaking honoraria and research support from Merck, Sanofi, Novartis, Biogen, Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb. EF has received travel grants from Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, and Roche. VP is employed by L'altrastatistica srl – Consultancy & Training, Rome, Italy. CG received a fee as speaker or advisory board by Teva, Novartis, Roche, Merck KGaA, Bayer, Almirall, and Biogen. MM is a scientific advisory board membership of Bayer Schering, Biogen, Sanofi-Genzyme, Merck, Novartis, Teva, Mylan, Almirall. He received consulting and/or speaking fees, research support or travel grants from Almirall, Bayer Schering, Biogen, CSL Behring, Sanofi-Genzyme, Merck, Novartis, Teva, Roche, and Ultragenix. He is principal investigator in clinical trials for Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, Teva, Ultragenix, and CSL Behring. AC received research grants or speaking honoraria and board participation from Almirall, Biogen, BMS-Celgene Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme.
Références
J Neurol. 2020 Jun;267(6):1715-1723
pubmed: 32100126
J Neuroimmunol. 2015 May 15;282:118-22
pubmed: 25903738
Front Immunol. 2020 Jan 10;10:2954
pubmed: 31998289
Am Health Drug Benefits. 2011 Jul;4(4):240-8
pubmed: 25126354
BMC Neurol. 2018 Oct 03;18(1):162
pubmed: 30285675
Neurology. 2005 Sep 27;65(6):807-11
pubmed: 16186517
Nat Commun. 2020 Jan 10;11(1):222
pubmed: 31924756
Int Immunopharmacol. 2020 Aug;85:106688
pubmed: 32544867
Antiviral Res. 2020 Jul;179:104811
pubmed: 32360182
Lancet. 2020 May 30;395(10238):1695-1704
pubmed: 32401715
Health Technol Assess. 1998;2(3):i-iv, 1-88
pubmed: 9561895
Transplantation. 2013 Aug 27;96(4):421-5
pubmed: 23736352
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2014 Aug;12(8):1183-90; quiz 1191
pubmed: 25099448
Neurology. 2005 Sep 27;65(6):802-6
pubmed: 16093457
Mult Scler. 2010 Jul;16(7):888-92
pubmed: 20200197
Ann Neurol. 2001 Mar;49(3):290-7
pubmed: 11261502
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019 Jul;32:54-63
pubmed: 31030020
J Adv Nurs. 2000 Oct;32(4):1008-15
pubmed: 11095242
Antiviral Res. 2020 Jun;178:104791
pubmed: 32275914
Front Immunol. 2020 Jun 18;11:1459
pubmed: 32655578